Allegra_w0kzhc

Allegra Kirkland

Allegra Kirkland is a New York-based reporter for Talking Points Memo. She previously worked on The Nation’s web team and as the associate managing editor for AlterNet. Follow her on Twitter @allegrakirkland.

Articles by

The Trump administration on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to deviate from normal practice and rule quickly on whether a citizenship question can be included on the 2020 Census.

The Justice Department, represented by Solicitor General Noel Francisco, is asking that the court provide a final ruling by the time the Census questionnaires are set to be printed in June.

The request follows a ruling last week from U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman blocking the addition of the citizenship question and accusing Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross of violating a “smorgasbord” of federal rules as he pushed for its inclusion. Ross ignored warnings from Census officials concerned that adding it would cut down participation in immigrant communities, leading to a less accurate count and a skewed allocation of government resources.

According to Francisco, following standard protocol and appealing the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit would not allow the Supreme Court enough time to issue a final ruling on the matter.

“The government must finalize the census questionnaire by the end of June 2019 to enable it to be printed on time,” he told the court a Tuesday filing. “It is exceedingly unlikely that there is sufficient time for review in both the court of appeals and in this Court by that deadline.”

Francisco noted that Furman’s ruling referred to the decennial census as a “matter of national importance” with “massive and lasting consequences”—considerations that merited this deviation from standard practice.

The case in New York was brought by some 18 states, several cities, and a number of civil rights groups. Other states have also sued over the citizenship question.

Read the full Justice Department filing below.

Read More →

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has agreed to testify before the House Oversight Committee in March over the Trump administration’s controversial decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census, the committee announced Tuesday.

Read More →

On Sunday, Rudy Giuliani told the New York Times that President Trump and Michael Cohen were in talks to develop a Trump Tower in Moscow through Election Day 2016. By Monday, Giuliani was claiming that he had no idea if that was true at all.

Times reporter Maggie Haberman tweeted out the statement Trump’s attorney put out “clarifying” his comments to the newspaper.

“My recent statements about discussions during the 2016 campaign between Michael Cohen and then-candidate Donald Trump about a potential Trump Moscow ‘project’ were hypothetical and not based on conversations I had with the President,” Giuliani said. “My comments did not represent the actual timing or circumstances of any such discussions. The point is that the proposal was in the earliest stage and did not advance beyond a free non-binding letter of intent.”

This is a notable reversal given that Giuliani had said he was directly quoting Trump when he told the Times the project discussions were “going on from the day I announced to the day I won.”

Giuliani made the cable news rounds on Sunday to discuss the project, acknowledging for the first time that work on it endured through October or November of 2016.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said that was “big news” that should have been surfaced earlier.

Trump has insisted there would be nothing wrong with him working on—and failing to fully disclose—a major development project in Russia at the same time that the country was covertly working to elect him as president.

Discussion of the development resurfaced after BuzzFeed reported Thursday that Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress about their work on it. Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office took the rare step of issuing a statement calling the article “not accurate.” BuzzFeed is standing by their story.

Read More →

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) expresses scathing contempt for President Trump’s White House hires in his upcoming book “Let Me Finish,” according to an Axios excerpt released Monday.

As in a previously released excerpt targeting Jared Kushner, Christie characterized Trump’s administration picks as unprepared, unprofessional, and unworthy of their titles. “Riffraff,” as Christie put it.

Former national security adviser Michael Flynn is described as a “Russian lackey and future federal felon.” Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt, who resigned last summer amid a swirl of ethics scandals, is called “greedy and inexperienced.” Former White House adviser Omarosa Manigault, who drew headlines for holding a photo shoot for her wedding on White House grounds, is dismissed as an “Apprentice show loser” doing “whatever Omarosa’s job purported to be.”

Christie’s book chronicles his time in politics, including his decision to jump on board the Trump train shortly after ending his own presidential campaign in 2016. The former governor was chosen to run Trump’s transition team after the GOP nominee’s surprise victory, but, as he recalls in the book, he was quickly fired from the job, with other staffers tossing his work “in a Trump Tower dumpster.”

Christie writes that he could have saved Trump “heartache,” chaos, and public humiliation had he followed the “detailed road map” that Christie laid out for the administration.

Read More →

BuzzFeed is insisting on the accuracy of a recent article disputed by special counsel Robert Mueller’s office, which reported that President Trump asked Michael Cohen lie to Congress about their efforts to develop a Trump Tower Moscow.

“We’re being told to stand our ground. Our reporting is going to be borne out to be accurate, and we’re 100 percent behind it,” Anthony Cormier, one of two investigative reporters who worked on the story, told CNN in a Sunday interview.

Cormier, who was joined by BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith, said that the months-long reporting process involved “rigorous” vetting. The two anonymous federal law enforcement officials who served as BuzzFeed’s sources are “standing behind” their information, Cormier said.

The report, which detailed alleged conduct that Trump’s own attorney general nominee suggested would have constituted obstruction of justice by the president, dominated the news cycle on Friday. But on Friday evening, Mueller’s typically press-shy office released a rare statement taking issue with the story.

“Buzzfeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not accurate,” Mueller spokesman Peter Carr said.

The statement did not specify which aspects of BuzzFeed’s article are “not accurate.”

BuzzFeed’s Smith told CNN he is “eager” to find that out, and that Jason Leopold, the other reporter behind the story, submitted a Freedom of Information Act requesting details on how the statement from Mueller’s office came together.

Read More →

LiveWire