Texas House Committee Wants Paxton Impeached

Paxton asked the Texas House to fund a lawsuit settlement; instead, it may impeach him.
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 01: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court on November 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. On Monday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a challenge to the controv... WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 01: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court on November 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. On Monday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a challenge to the controversial Texas abortion law which bans abortions after 6 weeks. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Months after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) asked the Texas House to get him out of a lawsuit by appropriating funding for a legal settlement, it may be about to remove him instead.

The Texas House’s General Investigating Committee on Thursday voted 5-0 to recommend impeaching Paxton over what are really the latest series of allegations of criminal wrongdoing against the state attorney general.

Paxton has been under state-level indictment since 2015 for securities fraud, but by this point that’s water under the bridge. What set the House off is more recent, and goes to allegations from within Paxton’s office.

Four fired aides filed a whistleblower lawsuit against Paxton last year, claiming that he retaliated against them amid what appeared to be a crime spree undertaken from within the office of the Texas Attorney General. Among other things, the former employees accused Paxton of an unsavorily close relationship with troubled Austin real estate magnate and Paxton political contributor Nate Paul.

In February, Paxton and the former aides agreed to a $3.3 million settlement, which would prevent the case from going to trial and revealing even more potentially embarrassing details. Under Texas law, the state House would need to appropriate $3.3 million for the settlement.

Instead, the state House’s Investigating Committee opened a probe in March. On Wednesday, investigators testified that they had substantiated the allegations made in the lawsuit, saying that Paxton had used his role in law enforcement to investigate FBI officials probing Paul, and that the Austin real estate investor renovated Paxton’s home and provided employment for his mistress in return.

Paxton lashed out on Tuesday and Wednesday, accusing House Speaker Dade Phelan (R) of being “intoxicated” at a public hearing and, even worse, of being a “liberal.”

Only two officials in Texas history have been impeached and removed, most recently in the 1970s. The state House requires a two-thirds majority vote for removal.

Notable Replies

  1. Are there any prominent Republicans who aren’t crooks?

  2. He is the perfect Repub so maybe he should be given an award instead of impeachment?

  3. Josh, I appreciate your humor very much regarding an otherwise most evil of all Texans:
    “…being “intoxicated” at a public hearing and, even worse, of being a ‘liberal.’”
    Thanks for the laugh.

  4. …and, even worse, of being a “liberal.”

    Same old tired playbook. It’s not going to work for you this time, Ken. Time to get rid of the especially stinky garbage.

  5. Much too damned late, but kick him out! His public corruption has been going on for far too long.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

121 more replies

Participants

Avatar for rxbusa Avatar for pac Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for becca656 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dryheat Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for caltg Avatar for marknc Avatar for tiowally Avatar for brian512 Avatar for tommbombadil Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for justruss Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for visionseeker Avatar for dogselfie Avatar for carpe_diem

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: