Scalia Gets Another Epic Trolling In Wisconsin Pro-Gay Marriage Decision

FILE - In this Oct. 18, 2011, file photo U.S. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia smiles during a college address in Chicago. Scalia said late Wednesday July 18, 2012, that he hasn't had a "falling out" with Chief J... FILE - In this Oct. 18, 2011, file photo U.S. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia smiles during a college address in Chicago. Scalia said late Wednesday July 18, 2012, that he hasn't had a "falling out" with Chief Justice John Roberts over the Supreme Court's landmark 5-4 decision validating much of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul."There are clashes on legal questions but not personally," Scalia said of the court. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

As has become a running theme in court decisions overturning state bans on same-sex marriage, conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia got some love when U.S. district Judge Barbara Crabb struck down Wisconsin’s ban Friday.

Scalia’s name is invoked 12 times in Crabb’s 88-page decision, including numerous references to his now infamous dissent in the Supreme Court’s ruling that overturned the federal Defense of Marriage Act last year. His dissent from the Lawrence v. Texas case, which overturned state bans on sodomy, is also cited on multiple occasions.

“However, as noted by Justice Scalia in his dissent, it is difficult to cabin the Court’s reasoning to DOMA only,” Crabb wrote as she concluded that the DOMA decision — if logically extended — requires the judiciary to strike down state bans on same-sex marriage as well.

It is the same point that Scalia made in his dissent, a point that judges in other states — Kentucky, Ohio, Virginia and Utah — have now referenced in their own decisions overturning or undercutting gay marriage bans.

Wisconsin Gay Marriage

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: