Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant Opposes Medicaid Expansion In Case Obamacare Is Repealed

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, a Republican, says he doesn’t want to expand Medicaid because Obamacare, he argues, might be repealed or altered in a way that forces states to pay the cost.

“For us to enter into an expansion program would be a fool’s errand,” he told the Associated Press in an interview. “I mean, here we would be saying to 300,000 Mississippians, ‘We’re going to provide Medicaid coverage to you,’ and then the federal government through Congress or through the Senate, would do away with or alter the Affordable Care Act, and then we have no way to pay that. We have no way to continue the coverage.”

It’s a novel argument based on an unrealistic hypothetical. GOP efforts to repeal or dismantle the core components of Obamacare have repeatedly failed. Some Republican governors who have rejected the expansion have suggested that the federal government won’t ultimately provide the funds the law requires it to.

Bryant also responded to an argument by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican who adopted the expansion, that turning it down would harm hospitals by raising the cost of uncompensated care.

“I don’t question Jan Brewer’s logic,” he told the AP. “She can do what she wants to do in Arizona. But I don’t believe you ever turn that back. I think she is going to bear the burden of those costs if that does occur. I wish her well with that. We just disagree on that.”

Some five million Americans won’t get Medicaid coverage because of decisions by their governors not to adopt the expansion under Obamacare, which the Supreme Court made optional. It covers residents up to 133 percent of the poverty line. Politics aside, it’s a lucrative deal: the federal government is required to pay the full cost for the first three years and 90 percent thereafter.

In Mississippi, about 137,800 uninsured residents will miss out on Medicaid coverage due to the state’s decision, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: