Neo-Confederate Choice For College President Prompts ‘No Confidence’ Vote From Faculty

Members of the College of Charleston community are not happy with the choice of a Republican politician with ties to neo-Confederates to be the next president of the college. Donors are complaining. Students are protesting. And on Tuesday, the Faculty Senate held a unanimous vote expressing no-confidence in the school’s Board of Trustees.

The college’s board announced late last month that it had voted to offer the president job to Glenn McConnell, the current Republican lieutenant governor of South Carolina. But McConnell’s lack of experience in academia, and his well-publicized enthusiasm for the Confederacy, quickly inspired protests.

The Charleston Post and Courier on Tuesday reported that within hours of the board’s announcement, Bill Asbill, a member of the college’s Foundation Board, sent out an email saying he would no longer donate to the school. George Watt, the foundation’s executive director, and Brandon Upson, a recent graduate who has been protesting the offer to McConnell, both told the newspaper that donors have spoken to them about the search process that ended with McConnell’s selection.

The College of Charleston Foundation is a nonprofit that raised money and promotes “programs of education, research, student development, and faculty development for the exclusive benefit of the College of Charleston.” It also supplies the majority of the current president’s salary. Watt, the foundation’s executive director, told the Post and Courier that he had not received any resignation letters, even though he was copied on the email from Asbill.

“I’ve heard and met with donors several times over the past four weeks in an attempt to assure them the process was above board,” Watt told the newspaper, adding that some donors had “the perception that there was a fix” to hire McConnell.

According to the Post and Courier, the Faculty Senate voted that it had no confidence in the board because the board had undermined confidence in the integrity of the presidential search process.

“We have a responsibility to speak up,” German professor Morgan Koerner said.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: