Pretty Weak, Guys

|
December 30, 2009 6:42 a.m.

We’ve now got an answer from National Review on why it was fine to try “shoe bomber” Richard Reid in a regular American court but not the Xmas Bomber.According to Marc Thiessen it’s because in 2001 – 2002 (when the key decisions were made on what to do with Reid) we didn’t know we had other options like military tribunals. (Now that’s obviously false since extra-judicial means were amply discussed from late 2001 through early 2003 — when we decided how to deal with Reid). The proof, says Thiessen, is how we dealt with Jose Padilla, who was transferred to military custody in Charleston, South Carolina.

But again, that’s clearly preposterous.

The reason we handled Padilla that way was because we didn’t have clear evidence to try him in a civilian court. If that were the case why did we try all the other people arrested in terrorist plots after Padilla in civilian courts? It can’t be because they were American citizens, because Padilla is an American citizen too.

There’s no way to spin this. There’s no reason beside GOP electoral strategy for not trying AbdulMutallab in a regular American Court.

Latest Edblog
  • |
    October 31, 2020 10:43 a.m.

    I think there’s something to this. From TPM Reader JK … I know that this hasn’t necessarily been an active…

  • |
    October 30, 2020 3:37 p.m.

    TPM Reader TB looks to some advantages if Democrats do well on Tuesday … Thanks for your coverage of the…

  • |
    October 30, 2020 1:37 p.m.

    Looking at the totality of the polls, the big story still seems to be an essential stability. In our conversation…

advertisement
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer:
SPECIAL DEAL FOR PAST TPM MEMBERS
40% OFF AN ANNUAL PRIME MEMBERSHIP
REJOIN FOR JUST $30