Intel Committee Chair Cuts Off Kamala Harris In Tense Exchange (VIDEO)

Senate Intelligence Committee members, from left, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Sen. Angus King, D-Maine, listen to testimony from Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and other security chiefs about gathering intelligence on foreign agents, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 7, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Senate Intelligence Committee members, from left, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Sen. Angus King, D-Maine, listen to testimony from Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and other ... Senate Intelligence Committee members, from left, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Sen. Angus King, D-Maine, listen to testimony from Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and other security chiefs about gathering intelligence on foreign agents, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 7, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Many members of the Senate Intelligence Committee engaged in aggressive questioning Wednesday morning, grilling the leaders of the NSA, FBI, DOJ and the Director of National Intelligence about whether President Trump has intervened in ongoing investigations in Russian election interference and allegations of collusion with his campaign.

Only one, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), was cut off by the committee’s chair.

Harris, the only woman of color on the committee and the former attorney general of California, was attempting to ask Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein about unresolved questions regarding his role in the firing of FBI Director James Comey and the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. She pressed him to give a firm yes or no answer as to whether special counsel Robert Mueller has “full independence” to pursue that investigation, which he did not do.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) interrupted Harris, complaining that she was not letting the witnesses answer her questions.

Harris then began a sharp exchange with NSA Director Michael Rogers on why he has spoken publicly about some of his conversations with Trump and not others.

“You can keep trying to trip me up–” Rogers protested, as she interrupted. “Senator, if you could, could I get to respond, please, ma’am?

“No, no,” Harris replied, before continuing with her question.

Committee Chair Richard Burr (R-NC) then spoke up to chastise her, urging her and other members to “provide the witnesses the courtesy, which has not been extended, fully across, for questions to get answered.”

The cavernous hearing room became tense and quiet.

When Harris tried to argue back, noting that earlier in the hearing a male senator had accused Rosenstein of filibustering, Burr cut her off again, instructing Rosenstein to speak. Harris sighed and became silent, looking supremely annoyed.

Rosenstein asserted that he “had a lot of experience with these issues and could speak to you for a very long time about it,” but declined to do so in open session. Her time for questions having expired, Harris left the room shortly after.

Her office later told TPM that Harris “will follow the facts wherever they may lead to get the truth for the American people. That can only happen when witnesses answer questions.”

Watch the exchange here:

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Mansplaining.

    Just absurd to see the GOP heads not afford Sen Harris the same courtesy as her male colleagues in the Senate.

    Btw, if these guys want a closed door meeting, then they should take that meeting and them come out and hold a press conference where they discuss what was said that is not classified or possibly those statements where executive privilege could be invoked. They have a duty to the American people and the public record.

  2. That was an utter disgrace! Sen. Harris was doing an excellent job in her questioning and was aware that she only had 5 mins to get answers. The way these men treated her was quite telling indeed!

  3. Trump/GOP: Woman and non-White, please just go away. Time to deport her.

  4. Harris was being adversarial, but what’s wrong with that? Rosenstein was being extremely disingenuous, saying basically “I don’t need to promise not to remove Mueller, because I and all the others who could remove him have too much integrity.” Which might be true, but if so why not formalize it anyway. And then at the end he said, “… or anyone else who is appointed to our positions.” And I thought that was a money quote because, well, have you seen some of the people Trump has been appointing? He can’t imagine someone in his position firing Mueller? Not only does he have an impoverished imagination, but Harris really did score on that one.

    I actually also liked McCain’s somewhat wry questions – although they were typically just a step short of the level that would have generated anything newsworthy.

  5. Yet she persisted.

    Hooray for Kamala Harris!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

69 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sandi Avatar for ccleis Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for milwaukeekent Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for becca656 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for jurisgal Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for ottnott Avatar for esva Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for esperia Avatar for lizskin Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for koseighty Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for tiowally Avatar for erratum Avatar for pasnell Avatar for clare Avatar for anon37557014

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: