In Gamed Vote, GOP ‘Rejects’ Senate Payroll Tax Cut Compromise

Thanks to a complicated manipulation of House rules, Republicans Tuesday rejected a broadly bipartisan Senate stopgap plan to extend the current payroll tax cut and other key provisions for two months.

The final vote was 229 – 193. In effect, those voting “yes” were voting to nix the Senate bill and to instead move ahead with House-Senate negotiations to pass a full-year extension of the payroll tax cut, emergency unemployment benefits, and Medicare physician payments, all of which are set to expire on January 1.

After staging a dramatic rebellion from GOP leadership, and putting the payroll tax cut at real risk of expiring, House Republicans are now taking an enormous leap of political faith. By nixing the broadly bipartisan Senate plan, they’re hoping to force Senate Democrats’ hand and bring them back to Washington to negotiate a 12-month extension of the payroll tax cut, in the final days of the year.The gamble is three-fold: that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will cave; that Republicans will get a better deal in the next two weeks than they will in two months; and third, that if the payroll tax cut expires they’ll manage to spin their way out of the blame for it.

Part of that spin will rest on the convoluted procedure Republicans used to reject the Senate compromise. They didn’t give that bill an up-or-down vote. They gave it a down-or-down vote. The question before the House wasn’t “do you agree with the Senate bill?” It was “do you disagree with the Senate bill?” Thus a “yes” vote was actually a vote against extending the payroll tax cut and vice-versa; and even if the majority of the House had supported the Senate bill, it wouldn’t have passed. It was set up to fail.

In the lead up to Tuesday’s vote, Senate Democrats expressed a great deal of confidence that they would win the battle for public perception. Now the question is whether they truly believed that, and will keep up the brinkmanship — even if it means allowing the payroll cut lapse temporarily — or whether, under pressure from House Republicans, they’ll come back to the Capitol and begin yet more negotiations on yet another compromise.

Both Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have said publicly they have no intention of reopening negotiations. But if they do, they’ll have an awful lot of leverage. As the 2011 calendar thins out, and the possibility that the payroll tax will expire becomes more and more real, they’ll be able to point to the Senate compromise — which got 89 votes — and demand Republicans offer them a better deal than that.

Masthead Masthead
Editor & Publisher:
Managing Editor:
Senior News Editor:
Assistant Editor:
Editor at Large:
Investigations Desk:
Senior Political Correspondent:
Senior Editor:
Front Page Editor:
Editor for Prime & Special Projects:
General Manager & General Counsel:
Executive Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Publishing Associate:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer: