« The Breast-Feeding Game Changer ------ | mjeffn's Blog | Palin out - Joe Dirt In »

FLIRTY? Are you kidding me? So manipulative!!!


WHAT A FUCKING INSULT TO WOMEN!!!!  I'M FUCKING INSULTED!!!  (I'm a man; a father who never lets his teenage daughter get away with behaving like that to get attention and what she wants.  Great role model Sara Six-Pack.)
Why didn't she just hike her skirt up a couple of more inches along with her winking at the camera?  She displayed all the worst female stereotypes with regard to affecting male attraction.  She was behaving like she just got pulled over by a cop and was trying to use the suggestion of sex to get out of a ticket.
"Can I call you Joe?"  Joe Biden is U.S. Senator who has served this country for 36 years; you uneducated small minded snotty prom queen!!!
She acted like she drank a gallon of coffee before the debate, sprinkled on a double dose of pixie dust; looked in the mirror and said to herself, "I'm so adorable that everybody will love ME!"


104 Comments

| Leave a comment

She is trying to seduce the public.

My favorite thing about (some) Obama supporters is their use of cool logic and reasoning, and a dedication to the issues at hand, rather than being caught up with petty personal issues.

I think your post can be summarized with this line... "you uneducated small minded snotty prom queen!!!"

Anyone that thinks Palin is uneducated or small-minded after watching this debate is not worth TPM's time.

Well, your bird thing is kinda cool. And, yes, her education leaves much to be desired.

Petty personal issues? Her behavior is revolting.

Much of the mannerisms Palin made, Biden made as well, just as many debaters do and get called out for it by their critics. Palin made mocking smiles while Biden gave answers, Biden made mocking smiles while Palin gave answers, McCain gave mocking smiles while Obama gave answers, Obama gave mocking smiles while McCain gave answers.

It's unfair to attack Palin for something that isn't exclusive to her. As msa3 wisely pointed out, Palin calling Biden "Joe" is no different from Obama calling McCain "John".

I didn't attacks the smiles, smirks or whatever at each other - it was Palin's looking directly into the camera and winking at the public that viscerally annoyed me.

user-pic

Look, the bitch winked "familiarly" at "ME," which suggested that she would sleep with "ME".

Not only do I not find her "pretty," or "attractive," or "charismatic" (try "ball trap"), I'm never going to meet her, and she isn't up to my standards. She acted the tart, the cheap (that a lie) whore one avoids in the bar.

Grow up: she is a twit educated to read sports scores on TV. She isn't sexy, or "hot," or worth one's valuable time. She's an insult not only to women but also to intelligent men who see her for what she is: an entitled manipulator.

A phony.

I beg to differ. Barack Obama and John McCain are fellow US Senators and except in cases of real emnity (which apparently McCain feels for Obama) Senators call one another by their first names. -- That said, I don't find her question particularly offensive although I notice he did *not* make the mistake of calling her Sarah. Although fully entitled to do so, that would inevitably have been seen as sexist.

He called her Governor Palin. A well-behaved veep candidate, he.

Exactly. The whole "can I call you Joe?" bit was coached in advance by her handlers to trick Biden into calling her Sarah.

Good on Joe for not taking the bait.

Manipulative is right.

..."also," by asking Biden if she could call him Joe, Palin was laying the foundation for that spectacularly flat come back later on: "Say it ain't so, Joe."

Either that, or she wanted to bump six-packs.

"It's unfair to attack Palin for something that isn't exclusive to her."

That's like saying it's unfair to attack a murderer because it isn't "exclusive" behavior (i.e., there's more than one).

Jesus Christ, will somebody save the English language from Palin and her supporters? You don't make smiles, or give smiles. You smile. It's a verb.

You don't make mannerisms either. This is as bad as the line I read about Palin's "facial gestures." I suppose nxt I'll read the expression on her hands was one of real surprise.

No wonder the world laughs at us.

OH GOD IT'S THE TPM POLICE!!!1

You better listen to Officer Rusty Pirate here, otherwise YOU'LL BE BANNED FROM TPM FOREVER!

No, you're right. Nobody should think Palin is uneducated and small-minded as a result of this debate. However, it is perfectly acceptable to think these things as a result of the fact that Palin has no education to speak of and a mind to match.

user-pic

Hi. My new name is nobody.

What you're reacting to is the way that beauty pageant contestants mug for the camera. If you view it that way, her behavior makes perfect sense/

Once a beauty pageant contestant, always a beauty pageant contestant?

To me, that winking was so cheesy.

Palin is a moron who didn't answer a single question or rebut any of Biden's attacks on McCain because she doesn't know his record or his policies. The little flirty thing played in AK but it was embarassing to see her try it on a national stage...and hey how about that shout out??? Or the insensitve answer after Biden talked about his family? I am glad she did not humiliate herself anymore and now she can go back to rallys and preaching to the choir while Obama/Biden go about winning the election and getting ready to get this nation back on track.

user-pic

Yes, it was interesting to see, on CNN, that men seemed to like her more than women among the undecideds. When she was prattling, the males drifted up on the dial while the women drifted down. Then, when she'd say something really dumb, like not leaving Eye-rack until we get "a victory", they'd both crank down together.

She's pleasant enough looking, I guess, but do you think Americans could stand listening to that screechy, Wisconsin-librarian voice for four years?
Excuse me, I meant listenin'.

user-pic

Wisconsin voice? Please!
She's a million miles from a Wisconsin voice.
Her accent sounds kind of western Canadian.

user-pic

Anyone WHO, not anyone that...


I think your mistake is to pretend that we can ignore the deliberate "culture war" that Palin represents (Fun fact -- she's been spotted with a Pat Buchanan button. Her ugly us vs them speech was eerily similar to his 92 one). The kind that simultaneously says that "small town" (read: white) folks are better than every one else, and also makes a mockery of the achievements of intelligent accomplished women like Senator Clinton.

Sorry, we know the games the GOP is playing. I don't think progressives have ever won by ignoring their opponents. Democrats historically are at their best when they are both high-minded but tenacious and tough as nails.

We don't get bogged down -- witness the many calls on TPM that Palin was a deliberate distraction, including by yours truly -- but I don't concede any ground to the little bigot. She deserves all the scorn she gets.

And lets not forget that Obama spent the entire debate calling McCain "John."

Not a great position for us to take.

OK....I'll concede that point.

Yeah, Matt, but John and Barack are colleagues...Joe and Sarah are not...

Still, we can't criticize them for doing the same thing we do. It's not fair. It makes us look hypocritical. It walks right into the idea that whatever our guy does is right, and whatever their guy does is wrong and defeats any logical argument we make. We're better than that. We need to be better than that.

It's not the same..that's the point. Palin is not Biden's colleague in the Senate.

Sure they are equals and colleagues, they are the nominees of our major Political Parties for Vice President. Biden isn't the Pope for God sakes, he's a US Senator (1 of 100) and she is a Governor (1 of 50). That's a non-issue. What annoyed you I think is what annoys all of us pointy headed elitists about her. She has no substance and resorts to winking and folksy talk to endear herself to the public.

And to the upset Bird upthread: If you think Newman's post is below the acceptable level of TPM discourse, you obviously haven't spent much time around here.

Obama and Biden have known each other for at least a couple of years, and have worked together and were presumably on a first-name basis with each other before the debates.

Palin had never met Biden before walking out on the stage last night - her using his first name struck me as presumptuous. She does not know him personally.

user-pic

And that she didn't know him personally was emphasized by that jarring response she gave after he had choked up recounting that dark moment in his life when his wife and daughter were killed and his two boys critically injured. Palin either completely ignored that, or was oblivious to it.

I reacted to her calling him Joe the same way I react to salesmen on the telephone insisting on calling me by my first name. It's presumptuous.

She was only doing what she was told to do, that was pretty obvious.

Exactly. Obama and McCain have worked in the Senate together for years. Biden and Palin had never met before.

Personally I think Palin's 'can I call you Joe' introduction was just a set-up to plant the 'so, there you go again Joe' line later in the debate, which was clearly a rehearsed jab and a very transparent one at that...

I agree.

She'd never met him and generally it's good manners to use a more formal form of address first and wait for the other party to offer use of his or her first name. Or at the very least to initate by offering something like "Please call me Sarah". (Did she do that? I may have missed it.)

But the real damage for her comes from putting that faux familiarity side by side with her lack of any sort of empathetic reaction to Biden's emotional moment when he is talking about his family. That was Palin's Dukakis moment.

anyone who watched that debate and somehow deduced that sarah palin is intellectually curious and proven is beyond daft....she is a great pupil at sticking to her talking points though....i give her that much....she dazzles the camera with the smiles, the winks, the folksy down talkin'...look, if you liked her in the beginning, you are heads over heels now...if she made you uncomfortable in the beginning, you have even more questions now! pat buchanan is besides himself with her performance and that is to be expected, but outside of the base, i dont think she made any impact...

As a woman whose chosen occupation is in a male dominated field, I found her behavior disgusting. Any woman who has struggled to have herself taken seriously in the workplace should be horrified by the way she acted. Can you imagine what would've happened if Biden had winked last night? That's all we'd be talking about.

user-pic

She has no sense of social boundaries. No idea that "folksy" is acceptable in a professional setting. Well.... she simply has no professionalism. That happens no only in her manner, but it is true of her ethics. The woman simply behaves as a VAMP under all circumstances and when she does not get her way in govt, she has no conflict resolution skills - just falls back on vamp and tramp (in the sense of being vindictive).

Ding, ding, ding! Give that cat a prize.

Great comment. Spot on.

user-pic

I so agree with you! That is the problem with right-wing faux feminism. They despise actual achievement such as educational excellence (too hirsute & Birkenstock, quote Kathleen Parker). Instead, they depend on cutesy flirtation on a foundation of behind-the-scenes cronyism and backstabbing.

It make me so mad......I could just spit!

"Can I call you Joe?" Joe Biden is U.S. Senator who has served this country for 36 years; you uneducated small minded snotty prom queen!!!
---------------------------------------------------

Obama called McCain, John, several times in their debate. I don't recall you being upset about that.

I conceded that point above and was then defended by stillidealistic reminding us that Obama and McCain are colleagues.

He's upset because she's trading on her looks to get attention and score points in a way that he would be horrified to see his teenage daughter emulate. I don't blame him for being upset. It's revolting.

Thank you Orlando. Finally someone understood my feeling upon watching her.

user-pic

It is clear that she has exploited her looks to get over on people for many years--its about the same ploy as "I'm going to make you rich", in other words, a ruse to persuade you to suspend your disbelief. She must have learned this early on, becaue it is her principal persona.

And it is true that many, if not most men have a reticular activation system that is highly responsive, and shuts down the cerebral cortex at the first eye bat.

Winking repeatedly is disturbing behavior for what basically amounts to the biggest job interview she's ever likely to have and, as such, likely NOT hired. Dig?

user-pic

It is the same technique used by female wait staff - physical touching of the male is known to induce familiarity and trigger the hormonal response thereby increasing the tip.

Last time I noticed it happenening my wife talked about ripping heads off.

Hence my wife having a visceral negative reaction to Palin that only gets stronger every time she gets in front of the camera

user-pic

No wonder Palin's polling numbers are so miserable among women!

Winking and flirting will go a long way to rebuilding the U.S. image on the world stage.

user-pic

It's already led to a fatwa.

user-pic

Sarah Palin undid her facade of charm and "regular" person humanity by her glib, unresponsive and uncaring response after Biden talked about being a single father and wondering if a child would live. He superbly kept control, though revealing deep human pain, and she glibly rattled off McCain is a maverick talking points as though she did not even listen to him

Moreover, her folksiness was so false it nauseated me. I get folksy, I am from small rural American where people say things like By Golly and Bless their hearts. But guess what, we don't say bless their hearts about oil company CEO's even ironically.

Correct.

It is the absolute falsity that irks. Disingenuous, put on, vapidly fake folksiness! Ugh.

user-pic

That grated for me. Right after the whole viewing public saw a man struggling with grief... she doesn't get it. That was evidence of a lack of empathy. Anyone with any decency would have remarked on that. It did not serve her well. But then, she's beyond repair in my view!

As I commented above, that was a Dukakis moment for her.

I thought her "folksy" performance not only came off as fake, but somehow cheapened the whole process...and the office she's running for, quite frankly. It was SUCH a turn off.

Judging by the CNN instant feedback meter thingy, her faux folksy charm did not play well in Ohio.

I'm heartened to see that there are others out there who realize that "faux folksy" is not what our nation needs in the executive branch at this time. Speaking of time, I found it fascinating that Palin stated at least twice that Biden was discussing "the past" when criticizing the Bush administration. As much as I'd like to see the Bush disaster come to an end, the last time I checked, he was still in the White House.

user-pic

"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

Repubs are really good at failing to remember.

What the Nazis were doing to Poland, Sarah Palin is doing to the English language.

Brilliant!!!!

user-pic

Word.

user-pic

oh thank you (she said wiping her eyes from laughter).....

FYI, on the Diane Rehm show (NPR) just now, a caller said he was undecided, but last night, Palin's winking lost him.

He said, "I want a vice president, not a coquette."

I Caught that too.

One of my classmates told me after the debate that Palin makes him more comfortable about mcsleaze. Literally vomited in my mouth a little at that.

I think we witnessed Palin using the skills she employed to win her the "Miss Congeniality" title in her pageant days.

If the p.c. hysteria of this post and thread are any indication, I guess Dems are worried about the potential power of Palin's sex appeal.

P.C. hysteria? Can you please blow already?

I was struck by something that I don't really know how to interpret -- on two or three occasions, Sarah Palin would lower her voice, quiet it down just a bit, look into the camera, and get sort of breathy. I guess that was sort of a desire to project sincerity and caring and warmth, but I had the uneasy feeling that she was trying to be seductive. And hey -- I've been happily married for 29 years, and no one has tried to seduce me in longer than that, so this is not a conclusion I leap to.

Did anyone else notice this? Am I misinterpreting?

user-pic

Yes, I saw that breathy lowered sexy voice act, she was auditioning for alllll the parts she could cover if only this wasn't the VP office. Acting!
Something should stick if she tried enough of her tricks. But the 4-12 sunk her.
"The 4-12, whats a 4-12? Overacting!" thank you Stan Freberg
It was so bedroomy and obvious I just squealed. She is a trip! And she has already built a road to nowhere. Now that says a lot about her ability to plan ahead.
She is a great combination of The Truman Show and Groundhog Day, every speech is the same and we know those damn talking points better than she does, they've been hammering them 24/7 for months and months.
Like Grandma said, "shes as happy as if she had good sense."

By Republican standards, she's perfect because all they basically require in a world leader is someone to wear good clothes, sit in the chair, and sign the papers that open the sluices of federal treasure to the right entities. She's perfect by their standards, because she can take direction, and get off all the right memes without the slightest care about their relative factuality, or the destruction they do to the national fabric or psyche.

Republicans are not interested in intelligence, in democracy, fairness, or justice. They want money. Which makes Palin the PERFECT TOOL.

"It's unfair to attack Palin for something that isn't exclusive to her."

Yes, it IS exclusive to her! Have you ever seen Kay Baily-Hitchinson, Hillary Clinton, Olympia Snowe, Nancy Pelosi.........there are a lot of female politicians that don't act like Jr. High school girls flirting with the quarterback.

She IS an insult to all women, and man too!

You watch Palin, and you can just immagine her pulling the train for the whole football team. You can see why she may have been popular in school.

are you a troll trying to interject a nauseatingly sexist idea into this otherwise normal flow of comments?

if not, then you should be aware nonetheless that your comment reveals you as a very likely hopeless pig

user-pic

Did she practice that in the mirror before the debates, just to make sure that her false eyelashes don't come off?

Does she wink at people when she is firing them?

"Don't worry, honey, you'll be fine, you'll find a job 'summer's' else, is all." [wink, wink)

I think her attempts to appear and sound folksy were over the top --- at times felt crude.

Sarah Palin is the Pamela Anderson of "folksy".

Seems that Peggy Noonan loved it. Maybe this is what she means by 'patriotic grace'. All we need is more winking!

DF, Peggy comes from a similar frame of ref, perhaps? eg - when she wrote her WSJ piece on meeting the last Pope she said things like - "I bent and covered his thick old knuckles with Chanel No. 23 red raspberry lipstick ... I think I said, ‘Papa.’" I do have a different outlook on this than most on this thread. Still, I will say that I think MoDo and Peggy are living in inversely but related worlds, whereas, Peggy and Palin are in adjacent worlds with communication ports installed in the wall. ;) Just saying. Peace.

See:

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/rnc/9745/

Nice link, thanks. I don't begrudge Noonan her perspective, but this link sums it up nicely: "beery sorority girl". She just oozes and it grosses me out. Doesn't help that she's got a new book out and I've been seeing and hearing her everywhere.

Somewhat relevant tangent: Totally bugs me to hear her talk about how we need to do away with the superficial nastiness of politics. Her compatriots like Lee Atwater created that atmosphere. Now that her team stands to lose control of the Executive AND Legislative she wants it to be all Mayberry? Give me a break.

Her compatriots like Lee Atwater created that atmosphere.

Re - Atwater, totally hammer-on-nail. I studied that election one semester and the thing I never understood is how people did not see what was happening. It was so strange for me to read about it and see documentaries about the stuff Atwater did and it's as if people were in some sort of mass induced blindness. So strange. And to me, albeit, many years later, it all seemed so apparent. Not unlike what I saw happening first hand in the 2000 election though. So I understand a lot better now. ;)

Re: Atwater. I lived that election one semester. America was different then. In the late Reagan years, things read a little differently.

But...she IS an extremely unintelligent person. Do you disagree? She couldn't even answer 80% of the questions asked.

I thought everyone was in "bi-partisan" agreement about at least that much. Guess you're the odd man out. You must "love" Israel as much as she...

"I guess Dems are worried about the potential power of Palin's sex appeal".

While the 'potential power' of her sex appeal might elicit a momentary sexual release for some males of the species, it most certainly doesn't qualify her to be VP or President. It is mind numbing to think anyone could be manipulated by her phoney 'feminine wiles' tactics, or worse, would cast their vote based on sex appeal. (keeping in mind most commenters here weren't frightened by the behavior - most were repulsed or insulted by it) I may be annoyed by her behavior, but I am 'worried' about her lack of experience, knowledge or issues, when she very likely could become President of the United States. For all her winking, nose-wrinkling, coy smiling, g-dropping, six-pack-hockey-mom-gotcha talking style, she only uses that to mask the fact she is a right wing radical who sees Alaska as the gathering place for the 'lower 48' when the End Times occur, wants to reverse Roe v Wade, ban books she doesn't like and continue McBush's stale broken policies. She resorts to those 'cute' tactics to deflect attention whenever she doesn't know the answers. Her 'folksy' speech pattern disappears when she is focused and engaged in serious dialogue, and reappears in order to fill in the gaping holes in her lack of knowledge. She wants you to believe she is vulnerable and harmless, while her track record in Alaska proves she is actually cutthroat and frequently abused her power. It is really sad commentary that Republicans would defend this pitiful VP choice when she could become President of the United States. Yes, that truly is scary.

I personally think it is the republicans who should worry. I think it is this appeal that hooked McCain into picking her. It must be pretty powerful to have conned the top of the ticket.

user-pic

You've put your finger on it!

After watching the debate three points were very clear to me:

Biden has the experience, knowledge and right position for the role. He was credible and the clear winner.

Palin delivered the talking points given to her but had no substance. Let's have her campaign party put her back unscripted on the campaign trail and not shield her. I doubt we will see that. They are all breathing a sigh of relief right now. Winking and talking points may work in the roles she's had up to date, but will not in serious discussions with foreign heads of state.

It was also clear that Palin will tow the line for big oil. She did not defend McCain's position of big oil tax breaks.

Troll not, for you do not know for whom the troll trolls.

Hey, TPM people. There's a permanent sign hanging in front of all progressive comments that says: Do Not Feed The Trolls.

So waste not (and want not) your time on pirate queen and talk amongst yourselves instead. Remember, trolls and fools cannot be separated from themselves and each other.

When I first saw McCain glance down at her legs at the convention, I felt like he had probably fallen for this type of seduction. This winking/flirting crap worked on McCain, so why not broaden the audience.

Winking and flirting and using "sex appeal" have no place being used by a VP candidate. It was embarrassing. But worse than that was watching yet another politician with HORRID grammar and pronunciation. I'm not talking about her accent - she can say EYE-RACK as long as she wants - but to use "can be attributed to" incorrectly as many times as she did, among other errors makes me cringe. And for pete's sake, it's NUCLEAR, not NUKULAR. If she wants to distance herself from George Bush, she needs to sound a bit more intelligent than him.

Geez, living in a blood-red southern state makes me want to pull out my hair every time I try to talk to the people who make up the GOP base about SP. It's so nice to have a choir to preach to.

Every time SP took that long pause to rev up the reformer, maverick, small-town Alaska spiel for the masses, I found my self making a "here we go again" deep sigh. Her manner was annoying, condescending and lacked authenticity.

What I liked about Biden's counter attack was that so far since her nomination, she has acted as though she owns the trade mark on small-town ideals. And when Joe told everyone his life story in Scranton etc. he was basically telling her "Look, we may not be from Wasilla, but dammit, we do understand small-town issues, so get of your high horse."
Since I am from a small town, that really resonated with me because I don't share her values and it makes me mad to see her being passed of as having them because one component in our lives is similar.

Schroedinger cat, as a woman who is also in a male dominated field, I understand your point. I never asked anyone to treat me differently because I was a girl. I always tried to do my best without resorting to sexual innuendo, and there are many times when it did not help me, but I have seen many women get ahead by using their sexuality, and it bothers me. It just seems like conservative men like trophy women and Sarah Palin is the latest one to put on the mantle.

Also, I agree her total lack of empathy for Joe was palpable. I can't say she is without emotion, I think she was just so focused on not screwing up that there was no time for emotions to kick in, but there was that odd smirk when she mentioned her "special needs child." I think the lack of emotion there was even worse than her response to Joe Biden's emotional moment.

Clearly, I have a very different outlook on this than most on this thread. I really don’t care that she winked and wrinkled her nose or got breathy in her tone or the perceived "sexualized" patina people are claiming she invoked. That had, like, NO effect on me and I refuse to judge her on that. Refuse. Sorry. I absolutely refuse to take her apart as a female. The primary campaign with Hillary Clinton taught me to see how that only goes into really bad places. And in rare moments, to my shame, I participated. I regret that. I will no longer do that.

It most certainly is your prerogative to go there and make assertions about your teenage daughter but Palin is no teen. She is a mother of teens. And franky, I do not see any regression in her actions with regard to this as you do. What I see is that during the R-Con in Minn, people claimed that men liked her because she looked good and expressed cohones (see her wolf hunting vid as that expression in the eyes of many people or the ways he allegedly took on the Oil giants in her state...). I see her making a bid to keep those people for McCain.

Now, it’s quite possible, she may lose them by her behavior last night. But I ask you – is that a better reason to not vote for her than because she is not good for the country with regard to her political and religious and legal outlook?

For who she is and her current qualifications and education, she did not do badly last night. In spite of what you may think with regard to her "flirtyness," she actually evinced a covert flintiness. She did not win, certainly, but she did not do badly. Important distinctions and not ones to be overlooked.

What bugged me, specifically is that she was so glib. She was glib about McCain’s purported maverickyness in the face of Biden’s personal strengths. She ran over that with no acknowledgement of his struggle or his deep pain for a family tragedy. That I had a harder time overlooking.

Another thing I found totally irritating was her practice of fake folksiness which is an insult to real people I know who are in fact quite folksy and genuine about it.

Her mispronunciations and misapplications of basic English I found beyond redemption.

Her appropriation and pretensions to political knowledge about other regions of the world were obviously parroted and limited. That I don’t want to see in the WH.

But taking her apart on her flirtyness? I’m not going there. Not.

While I thought her demeanor was at times that of an insubstantial person, which I think is a highly valid way of reading it, I think yours is just a great comment.

Nothing good comes of going there in general (taking her apart on flirtiness), and it's not good for our politics. This echoes was dijamo was saying earlier today about double standards. Fully agree with you.

"insubstantial person" sounds like the perfect set of words to describe much of her performance last night. :)

As always, you find the most appropriate words, articleman. Thanks. ;)

Evainne. I don't disagree with anything you say and think you are spot on. My reaction was emotional and visceral, not rational and analytical. Both are valid bases of response though nowhere did I, nor do I, suggest my post as a foundation from which to base an actual political tactic.

What I saw was a "debate" in which one contestant was speaking in, at times boring, Senatese (word?) while the other contestant appeared to be doing a pole-dance routine. The thought that that person could wind up leading the free world (if that is still a relevant description of the office) after watching her nauseating behavior, revolts me.

user-pic

I think that she was channeling St Ronnie with all the "...there you go again..." crap, but Sarah is no Ronnie (not that that is really something to aspire to anyway.)

I also felt that she was dissing Biden with the whole "can I call you Joe" shtick.

Bottom line, we have had 8 years of fake folksy and I think everyone is tired of it. On that note, did anyone else notice that in his last couple of pleas for the bailout, Bush has lost his phony Texas accent?

We all know that President Bush just signed a bill that was deemed necessary by him and his administration to avoid a financial meltdown. When he was inaugurated in January of 2001, I believe that was the first time we had a Conservative Republican President along with a Republican Congress since Herbert Hoover and the 71st Congress. Dwight Eisenhower had a Republican Congress from 1953 to 1955 but he could hardly be considered a conservative. Ike continued all the New Deal programs he inherited including the progressive taxation policies of Roosevelt and Truman. According to Ike's biographer, Stephen E. Ambrose, he ran as a Republican in 1952 to prevent a conservative like Robert Taft or Douglas MacArthur from getting the nomination.

Is it just a coincidence that this combination has, once again, led us down the same path?


You can view Sarah Palin's post-debate analysis of her performance here!

http://www.236.com/video/2008/sarah_palin_vlog_5_postdebate_9308.php

She doesn't remind me of hometown America hockey mom, she's got her lingo mixed up. Sarah speaks like and reminds me of Daisy Mae Scraggs and other wimmenfolk from Dogpatch, USA. Dogpatch?!! THAT's where the pitbull came from. Hee Haw!

http://www.lil-abner.com/dogpatch.html#dogpatch

Sarah still thinks she's running for beauty pageant Queen, not VP. That performance was EXACTLY the kind of show one puts on for a pageant. And, excuse me, are we really stupid enough to fall for that "folksy charm" after 8 years of George Bush??

Offended isn't the right word for how I feel. Disgusted and alarmed are closer. Disgusted because the bimbo-act is always manipulative and stupid. Alarmed because, as a public figure, she affects the image of every woman.

I get the heebie-jeebies listening to her voice, so I watched the whole thing with mute and closed captioning. I strongly recommend going to a website and watching the thing without sound. It's very edifying.

Her body language, not only with the camera but with Biden himself, was seductive in the most literal sense of the word. Her eyes would widen in wonder, she did slow affectionate blinks and winks, her head bobbed softly, and even while uttering the words "stinking corpse" her smile and soft eyes remained unchanged.

I imagine this is supposed to get men to fall in love with her. I don't know about being offended, but I'm definitely disgusted. Any professional woman, and most working women in general, will be alarmed by the idea of a seductress in the White House, no matter which wing she occupies. They'll be pissed off if their husbands act like she's the VPILF.

A female friend said that she and her son were indeed alarmed by Palin. But her husband, a hippie-ish intellectual, was smitten. And that scared her and her son even more.

The expression we use down here is "50 pounds of horse manure in a 10 pound bag."

Can't believe that none of the pundits are picking up on the the most outrageous thing she said all night was an endorsement of Dick Cheney's "unitary executive" theories and inter-dimensional phase-shifting of the Office of the Vice President.

Assuming she ever answers a real reporter's question again, I'd like to hear someone ask, "Gov. Palin, if you were elected Vice President, would you publish a list of your staff and your calendar, or like Cheney, claim it is protected by Executive Privilege?"

How about "all hair and no moose"?

I wish I'd thought of this, but I didn't. It was some guy called wilytrax at Truthdig.

I think people accusing Palin of being "false" are mistaken. The way she behaved is probably *exactly* how she normally acts. Just like McCain repeating "Did you know I was a POW?", Palin is playing up the mantra "Did you know I was almost Miss Alaska?"

That stuff works unfortunately. And it has no doubt worked for her her whole life. It's unlikely she would have gotten as far as she has without her feminine wiles. She certainly wouldn't have been tapped for VP. I strongly believe that part of the reason she did so bad in the Couric interview is because Katie is a powerful, smart and very attractive woman and Palin couldn't work her wiles. Her confidence faltered in part because she had nothing to fall back on. She wasn't getting the subtle, approving feedback that a man would give (if not in reality in her imagination).

Leave a comment

mjeffn

user-pic

Following: 1
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address