« Palin and Presidential XOXOXO (and more!) | MsJoanne's Blog

Republicans OWN this financial disaster (and more!)


Here is today's list of great stories and videos.

Let's take a walk down memory lane and take a look at the multiple areas of mismanagement, ignorance, and all things Republican that led to our financial meltdown.  Sorry GOP, you own this financial crisis...bought and paid for with OUR money.

Bailout? What bailout?  The Republicans in Washington say Bring on The Great Depression of 2008.  Unreal.  Nothing matters to these people except political theater, bluster and gain. 

McCain already won the debate that hasn't taken place yet?  HUH?  Yup.  The advertisement was already placed in the Murdoch Street Journal.  Un.Freaking.Bee.Leave.Able. Yes, this is a paid ad.

Freedomrebel asks:  Governor Palin, have you no ethics?  I think we all know the answer to that.

Henry Paulson receives the Veruca Salt Award.  Couldn't go to a more deserving person.

If you missed this, this is a must read!  Bill Clinton on Obama.  This discussion about Foreign Policy, and how much better Obama will be, reminds us why Clinton was a good president.  This is a fantastic piece.

Personal responsibility is only for the little people.  Good to know.  How's the economy working out for you guys on Wall Street these days?  Ownership society my ass.

Need a quick refresher on the Keating 5?  I heard a guy on the radio who is on the ground in California say that almost none of the younger people in Cali have ever heard of Keating 5.  Note to Obama - American's need a history lesson.  Give it to us!

If you missed this combination vlog/blog entry on Palin and her crazy beliefs in the end times, how her state will play a big part in the end times, the radical and violent associations she has with different extremist church organizations and of course, her witch hunting pastor, you have to read and watch all 13 of the videos shown here.  It will blow you away.

If you missed these videos they are pretty damned funny:

Letterman skewers McCain for premature evacuation.

Colbert mocks McCain by suspending his show.

Craig Ferguson takes on McCain suspending his campaign.

If you liked any of these stories/videos, please Recommend this post.


26 Comments

| Leave a comment

BTW, thank you all for the many kind words. I am thrilled that so many of you like these posts.

Happy weekend all around!

user-pic

It is a happy weekend, isn't it? I know there's a long road still... but big sigh of relief to see that Palin is a total train wreck and her mentor is not far behind!

But the dittoheads say the rich tycoons of Wall Street and the mortgage/real estate industry were just fulfilling a tender-hearted desire of theirs and liberals of trying to help the poor get a home.

The fact that the unselfish public spirited financiers made billions off writing, packaging, selling, insuring and hedging the CDO paper was not a factor at all.

Never heard a dittohead say that, neither have you, but hey, yer a Democrat, feel free to claim someone else posted this for you.
Maybe one of Barracks many inept aides who have filled out numerous political position statements in the past for Barrack that "really, really, really weren't " his political position?

Actually the Rich financiers pretty much had these loans forced into their markets via democrat-led pressure on Fannie and Freddie to grant bad risk loan guarrantees?

Thisa is so naively revisionist it's comical, heheh.

Actually, the dittoheads are saying it was dumb ass minorities and illegal aliens who took advantage of poor Wall Street.

Rush is just DYING these days to use the N-word.

Malkin cursed the illegals.

It's always the powerless people's fault, donchano.

Anyone who listens to Rush should be required to take an IQ test to be able to vote. Talk about propaganda at its worst.

The financial crisis is definitely not "owned" by the GOP. And it's that kind of thinking that gets us to the wrong place.

The banking industry and the financial sector has been morphing for the past 28 years -- including the 8 years of the Clinton administration -- to get us to this point.

What this (GOP) administration does own is bankrupting the country on a lengthy and unnecessary military involvement in Iraq. Just imagine if we had the nearly $600B spent on the war
( http://zfacts.com/p/447.html ) now to place into the economy.

But the lack of fiscal responsibility and oversight is a bi-partisan issue. If you need further proof, just look at the number of Dems who were in the Keating 5.

And the dems in Keating 5 are gone...McCain is not.

That wasn't the point... and you know it.

user-pic

A distant (believe me, VERY distant) cousin sent this to me today. It's from the Patriot Post, and it traces the financial problem back to ... who else? Bill Clinton.

Boy, do I not understand the Conservative brain.

http://archive.patriotpost.us/pub/08-39_Digest/index.php#continued

user-pic

And the biggest thing on Colbert, I think, was the clip of Paulson blaming "future administrations."

"Set the 'Way Forward Machine,' Sherman!"

"Republicans OWN this financial disaster (and more!)"

"OWN" it????? Are you kidding? The ROOT of the problem is BAD loans to high risk borrowers mandated via Freddie and Fannie! Mandated by who?

The answer: What has four legs, long ears, and goes "HEE_HAWWW"

Obamas "bottom up" economic plan has a track record, and buukuu bad loans to lower income, high risk people were FORCED into the mortgage market. Then simple raw GREED, Republican and Democrat caused this.

Further, as someone pointed out above, Clintons hands are covered with dirt in this fiasco, and WHO contols Congress? What did THEY lay on Bushes desk that would have averted this crisis? ZIP.

If anyone OWNS this disaster, it's the Democrats, and the Paper trail leads Straight to them. The truth hurts, don't it? :)

Are you fucking kidding me? Who created the mandate for FM/FM to do sub-prime?

http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/who-created-the-fannie-maefreddie-mac-sub-prime-mandate/

Honestly, the truth does hurt. Get a clue, eh?

Ronfucius,

You are as bad as Ms Joanne. The slide started with deregulation in the 1980s. Both parties have held the White House and Congress during that time.

Both you and Ms Joanne are cherry picking convenient facts to make you comfortable with your pre-determined choice. However, it should be clear by combining the both your tableaus is that both parties have contributed.

This is what's wrong with most discussion on TPM: it's mindlessly partisan. Makes those people here engaging in that type of "debate" no different than Rush Limbaugh and Bill OReilly.

And finally, it was the present GOP administration and *both* parties in Congress that own the unnecessary war in Iraq -- and *that* is $600B we could have used now.

Actually Clearthinker, you are't thinking so clearly. I haven't cherry-picked a thing. Ya need to pay attention, my friend. Note line seven in my post. Please don't assert that I asserted something I didn't.

Now you are half right. MZ Joanne is clearly cherry picking. Her "documentation' is sorta like someone using her post for documentation.

Further, her "documentation" didn't even remotely demonstrate what she states as her position. Mr. Jackson was a bad manager at HUD is all it proffered. Interest Rates and policywriting were not Mr. Jacksons Jurisdiction. He didn't have anything to do with setting loan mandates, his job, bungled or not was, merely to implement these democrat-driven policies. (Also: Please note that HUD itself is a socialist entitlement product of DEMOCRAT President Lyndon Johnson)

And I do agree that both parties were more than willing to go into Iraq. And in hindsite (There were none, though Sadaam DID essentially bluff and imply that he might have them might not)

He played a stupid game, but he WAS a dangerous man. He DID have a track record for using mass destructive weapons, and he was FAR too unfriendly to our nearby allies.

So, ya might want to can your hindsight-drivien pomposity, really. The reality is that we are there now, and ya can't turn back the clock.

Going in and finding no weapons is a blunder that will PALE in comparison to pulling out now that we're there.

Also . . .you added ZILCH to this discussion, ya just came in bitching about others with nothing to support yourself. Think clearly for a minute, get back on that high horse, when ya got something besides whining with no real substantive point of view.

For the record, simply blaming "deregulation" I'll consider a copout. There was some deregulation during the Reagan era, but the rub lies in . . .you guessed it . . . the CLINTON era.

Was it a Republican controlled Congress? sure was. And one thing the Republicans fought HARD for was to exclude mandated crappy loans for poor credit risks . . . but guess who wouldn't sign the bill until the Republicans backed off this . . . . yep . . .the Big Democrat.

Again:
The root of this problem is NOT Home Mortgages . . . it's the proliferation of defaulted/defaulting high risk mortgages . . .the ones Democrat Bill Clinton strongarmed the Republicans to accept or sit down and shut up.

Sorry Ronfucius.

The banks and their over leveraging is the real problem.

Why should Merril Lynch and Lehmans and AIG go under because less than 1% of homes in the US are being foreclosed? Huh?

Overleveraged is right . . . overleveraged because the "leverage" are loan packages that nobody wants to buy right now. Sorta like these supposed "Gas shortages" lately. There really is no shortage, but lots of folks panic, fill up, run the tanks down before the fuel truck can get back and Poof! ya got a closed gas station. In other words, a LOT of it is market perception.

While you mention "only" one percent of homes are being foreclosed, there are a LOT more in default, in arrears, and the real estate market is dead.

This makes Mortgage bundles unattractive. The banks that are in deep with these types of mortgages are stuck. Cash flow is bottlenecked, and due to the uncertainty, NOBODY want's to trade mortgages. Much of it is simply blind fear, so mortgage backed loans become REAL stagnant.

In other words, many large banks are overleveraged because the leverage they had are the unsellable high-risk mortgage bundles.

These mortgage bundles would be a LOT more liquid if it weren't for the forclosed, near-forclosed, and increasingly in arrears high risk loans these banks are avoiding like the plague. This has Also slowed availability of other credit . . . bla, bla, bla. Domino effect, much because of nothing but blind fear.

No need to be sorry, I have a handle on it, and have taken a tidy profit on it, actually.

You are absolutely correct. This is exactly why there is a problem. But you could probably boil it down to one word which is overarching the markets and that is trust.

Because of the mass amount of greed on Wall Street (and within various companies, e.g, Enron, Tyco, etc.), along with these bundled mortgage instruments where they mixed AAA, BBB and CCC rated mortgages still given the AAA rating (I suppose we should throw Moodys [I believe it is Moodys that provides the ratings] into the lack of trust arena because of their rating these new instruments as being top notch when they were not), no one is interested in buying ANY of these instruments which is why there is so much turmoil in this particular sector. And because mortgages in general could be a very safe way to invest, IF you got the AAA mortgages promised, many retirement pension funds bought them, as did many of the money market, mutual funds, etc., which is what is flowing downstream throughout much of wall street and why there is such concern - because it is not just the greedy people on WS who are affected, but any company or individual who invested in these wrongly rated instruments.

Now couple that with the highest unemployment rate in 17 years, higher costs for food, et al (some due to transportation costs), cost of fuel for our cars/homes, cost of healthcare, etc., the domino effect of foreclosed houses bringing down the value of the surrounding properties making it difficult, if not impossible in some markets to sell if you have to (for financial reasons, change of jobs, what have you) because they use those foreclosed houses sell price stats in appraisal comps for YOUR house, and it is ugly. Very ugly. And ugly for many more people than just those on WS - and not just those who are potentially losing their homes.

user-pic

Here are some other viewpoints on whether this is a real crisis and what the crisis really is:

Here's what 20+ year member of Congress Rep. Marcy Kaptur has to say: here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S27yitK32ds&eurl

What another TPM poster and experts on a Harvard panel have to say here: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/26/is_the_crisis_real/index.php

What Glen Greenwald and Digby discuss is here: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/
(just scroll down to his September 24th radio discussion)

What Bruce Marks of NACA says here:
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/3/26/homeowners_plan_demonstration_at_ny

From your first link above:
As he put it, why do business with Warren Buffett who will negotiate a tough deal, if you believe that the government will ride in soon with cheaper cash?

Except that Warren Bufett says that this bailout HAS to happen.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/3074070/Warren-Buffett-compares-US-bail-out-decision-to-action-over-Pearl-Harbour.html

Why would Buffett say this if he would be cutting off his nose to spite his face?

I do not buy into the "give them $700 bill all at one time to do whatever with no accountability and keep giving exec's whatever they want" bullshit. No, I would not support that. But I do support keeping the markets from failing because it will hit more people than just those at the top who created this situation (specific to the greed of mortgage instruments as stated above).

Yes, you could go back to deregulation as a cause. You could say that Clinton signing the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act (all three of them Republicans) into law was a cause. But to have Bush (through HUD) mandate sub-prime, which, btw, he did on video (one I haven't looked for but Randi Rhodes [whom I don't like] had a clip of him saying just that on her show the other day), coupled with both of the above causes, sealed the fate and allowed greed to do its thing - unfettered by any agency in the Bush administration because any oversight is bad, according to the financial Bush Doctrine.

user-pic

I have an award?! Cool! Gimme gimme gimme!

Gimme gimme gimme! How Veruca of you! :-D

You, MSJoanne have done it again, loved your Clinton must read.

There have been some that have said he hasn't done enough,is really not helping. On the contrary he has conducted himself as an ex-president should. He has not demonized Mc Cain, while leaving no doubt Obama is indeed qualified.

He confirmed on Larry King he will be campaigning eagerly in the very important swing states after the first debate.

Thanks again for all the goodies.

I boil it down to 3 words:

"Democrat/Socialist mandates corrupt absolutely"

That might be more than 3 . . .sorry!

Ronfucius say:
Socialist think top-down economics mean trickled on,
but so more true that bottom-up Obanomics mean Dicked in Ass.

(Pretty accurate eh? ;^)

So . . . are we conceding that the Republicans don't "own" this debacle, but are minority shareholders?

Leave a comment

MsJoanne

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address