« Mc Cain & his Models/Beauty Queens | Now is the Time's Blog | I don't want to be strong!!! »

Hey! Leave that (Cough) VP Pick Alone!


Ok, I am the first to admit that Sarah Palin is possibly the worst VP Selection in the history of the United States.  But a bad VP pick for Mc Cain is a good VP Pick for Obama.  While I hate to politicize the office of the Vice-President, it is after all political.  It is true that if Mc Cain wins the Presidency, Palin would be a heart beat away from the Oval Office- a scary thought indeed.  But, this awful pick only solidifies to the voters what a horrible President Mc Cain would be. 

In my opinion, the Palin pick is a gift that we should never give back.  (Ok, maybe we could after the Vice-Presidential debate)  My worry is that we are pushing too hard, too soon and the gift will be taken away.  The fact that she may withdraw her name from consideration -- ala Harriet Meyers --  is not what worries me.  How she would withdraw her name from consideration is what could be a strategic disaster for Democrats. 

Why?  Because the Republicans would never allow it to be about John Mc Cains judgment, or lack thereof.  The Republicans would make it all about the unfairness of  the media and the horrible "liberals."  Both groups would be demonized for being to harsh in their thoughts, words and deeds regarding Palin.  Of course, the ultra-conservative groups would agree.  Also, many women would agree.  Let's fact it, Governor Palin would become a martyr.  Her name would forever be the rallying cry for the injustice leveled against hockey moms and it would all be the liberal media and the Democrats fault. 

As for the media, their credibility would be shot for the remainder of the election cycle.  As for the Democrats, theri message of change would be overshadowed by the cry that they are playing the same old politics that they have been playing for the last eight years, obstructing judges, justices, ambassadors and now Vice-Presidential candidates.  In short, it would be a stroke of good luck for the Republicans that Mc Cain's pick was so bad.  He would get a do-over -- Joe Lieberman -- and still reap the benefits of the Palin pick; a galvanized base.  In a sense, he would get two Vice-Presidential picks for the price of one. 

Strategically, you couldn't make a better plan.  It would indeed pick off women, Evangelical Christians, Jews and independants for the election.  If I didn't know any better, I would say this horrible pick was intentionally orchestrated by one Karl Rove.  After all, I did see him on Fox News yesterday, gleefully proclaiming the brilliance of the Palin pick.  In fact, he was down right giddy.  Now ask yourself, as a political mastermind, if your party had just given up its best argument against Obama-- experience -- by picking a running mate with far less experience than your opponent, would you be giddy?  

Any time Karl Rove is happy, I am nervous.  This could be his masterful, strategic move.  Analogized by a strategy in chess where you purposefully give up your queen to get another queen in a stronger position.  I feel that we as Democrats should remember that the goal is to take the king and let Mc Cain keep his weak queen.  Don't push Palin too hard, at least not yet.  This game is not over until the votes are cast and allowing Mc Cain off the hook for his bad choice is dangerous.  While the majority of us would see through the Republican smoke and mirrors and see that this selection was a bad one, the problem is that a lot of voters just might fall for it.  In an election this close, it doesn't take a lot to make a difference.  

Frederick Griffin 

 


11 Comments

| Leave a comment

I share every concern that you just voiced. It is, indeed, what I am expecting to happen, God help us all.

Palin as bone thrown to the far right before withdrawing to make way for Holy Joe I'd heard, but her additional role as a rope-a-dope directed at the media and left blogosphere is a new wrinkle I hadn't thought of -- and you're right, it's a scary possibility that does sound like something an evil genius like Rove might conceive. Still, we shouldn't overestimate Rove -- he knew his party was going to hold both houses of Congress in 2006, and had even gone so far as to hire a research team to study how all the polls except his secret, unpublished internals had gotten it so badly wrong.

user-pic

If Palin withdrew, ultimately she'd be seen as a lightweight who got booed off the stage. And women would likely view her as a quitter, someone who couldn't take the heat, and did their cause harm.

Your concerns seem to assume that the GOP/MSM operate in a vacuum. While I agree that the Dem voice sometimes gets lost in the caucophony of right-wing screeching, the only people who will hang on to some sort of "the liberals were too mean" meme will be the dumb fucks who already hysterically support Palin because they've been told to. The rest will see it for what it is because it is too obvious to miss and too hard to spin (like her foreign policy 'experience' of being near Russia).

So, do you think if Palin withdraws that the Republicans would not blame the Democrats?

They would.

When Mc Cain replaced her with a man -Liberman- SOME women would blame the Democrats. We were after all the ones who protested he being named as VP running-mate.

No vacum needed. All Mc Cain needs is a few (2%-3%)to fall for it and he wins.

The sentiment that could persuade is:

"First the Democrats chased Harriet, Hillary and now they chased Sarah away. They must hate women."

The same thing goes for conservatives or those who have viewed Democrats past actions of blocking judeges as being obstructionalist.

Just a few percent and Obama is toast.

All Im saying is that we should force Mc Cain to live with his pick and not let him off the hook.

I'm on record saying that she'll be removed from the ticket (withdraws, is replaced, whatever) by today. But if they don't do it today and she gets on stage to give her speech, then I think that ship has sailed. Up until now she's a correctable tactical error. After the big speech, she's on the ticket, and all that that implies.

Cannot agree with this. Presidents do not get do-overs.

You guys that think Palin is withdrawing are dreaming. She's raised 10 million in 2 days, and she's fired up the ground game, evangelicals. Yes, she horrid, yes she will turn of independents, but McCain wasn't winning without turning out Jebus's army. They are playing their favorite game at the convention.. ooooh the liebural media is after us. OH NOES!!! This will rally the hard core. I've been to the boards, I've listened to the radio...they love her... their shield of ignorance is too strong to penetrate.

Yep. Fortunately, everyone else i.e. the "swing vote" is getting the hell away from them as fast as they can.

Palin is obviously going nowhere, unless she gets hit with an Eagleton-type bomb. (Material proof of malfeasance in Trooper-gate, as an example.) Even if you put the money-raising and reichwinger galvanizing aside, the embarrassment of having to pull Palin would be devastating in public opinion.

Analogized by a strategy in chess where you purposefully give up your queen to get another queen in a stronger position. I feel that we as Democrats should remember that the goal is to take the king and let Mc Cain keep his weak queen.

If this election were a chess game, McCain would best be described as being squeezed off the board. He's now playing a wild sacrifice (Palin) in the hopes that his opponent will get rattled and make a mistake to open the door for him.

Sometimes, a bad move is just a bad move. Rove was playing checkers against Kerry's camp. The game is chess now, and Obama's camp takes second fiddle to no one in analyzing the best continuation.

Let's not get over confident here.

1. Rove did not just all of a sudden up and get dumb.
2. He also did not leave the political game. He's still in it, even though he act like he isn't
3. Just because Rove and George Bush beat Kerry at checkers don't assume they cant play chess.

This election is about getting the most votes counted in the proper states and it's not over until the votes are counted.

Not who make the best VP choice.

Not who should get the most votes.

It's not even about winning the most votes in the proper states.

If Obama had made a bad VP choice the Republicans would have held their cards close and waited to spring their attack. So should we.


I only make the point that we should not let Mc Cain take his move back so he can make another one.

At the very least, we should leave her alone until it's too late for Mc Cain to replace her.

Leave a comment

Now is the Time

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 1

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address