Bring on the Fiends
Yesterday I read “What of the Other Fiends?”, a NY Daily News Washington Bureau online article by James Gordon Meek. It said that some family members of September 11, 2001 victims want the masterminds of that horrible day to be prosecuted and stand trial, instead of being tortured in some undisclosed location outside the country. I couldn’t agree more.
Before Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was captured, I had read that he was the one who thought up the plan that devastated so many lives that day and I prayed he would be caught. When he was caught, I was thrilled but I couldn’t figure out why it wasn’t huge news. I never heard anything else about him for the longest except that he was outside the country in a secret location and was in US custody “being interrogated”.
So for three years I’ve been wondering why no one has brought up this subject and I’m so thankful for this request by Kristen Breitweiser, who lost her husband Ron, and Harry Ong, who lost his sister Betty. Perhaps someone will listen to them.
First let me say that when you do the wrong thing, the wrong thing will come back to you. Perhaps not in a direct way, but eventually. Know it.
Torturing people is wrong. Full stop. What religion condones it? Not even Martha Stewart can say it’s a good thing. How in the world can the US administration talk about upholding Geneva Conventions regarding not torturing captives, then turn around and say it’s OK for us to do it? When you say one thing and do another, or your actions don’t match your words, you simply lack integrity. Are we a nation of integrity or not? Or doesn’t that matter anymore if we can still “get ahead” without it? Does one ever really get ahead without it?
Do people really think that torturing someone reveals truthful information anyway? I don’t know about anyone else but I’d tell you whatever I thought you wanted to hear, truth or not, if you were torturing me. And it’s been 3 years, how much information could they possibly have?
And don’t get me wrong, I’d secretly love to pummel them myself. Revenge is part of our baser human instincts. But can’t we rise above that and go with our own expressed American principles of a reasonable trial?
As a trauma nurse I have had to care for people who are injured or ill and under arrest for shooting someone, or committing other terrible crimes against innocent people. I had no choice but to rise above my base instinct of wanting to see them suffer or in some way pay for their crimes. But I’m a nurse, not a judge. I took an oath so I did the right thing by my profession. It’s called having integrity. And it may serve us best this way in the end.
If you do the right thing the right thing comes back to you.
People are physical, emotional and spiritual beings. And many times I’ve seen the difference the emotions and spirit can make in the healing and recovery of the physical body. I believe it would be good for the psyche of the American people as a whole to get the satisfaction of seeing Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh and Whalid Ba Attash prosecuted, and to have to face those whose lives they have destroyed. I believe the family members who are asking for these prosecutions are crying out for this action. I can totally empathize. It’s called being human. And it’s the American ideal. That which truly makes us a model for the world. Open justice, not torturing someone in secret. Perhaps it would also help Americans to refocus on the real culprits of the worst terror attack ever against us. It would do our spirits good to see these guys face American Justice. It’s the right thing and will bring the right thing to us-healing and recovery.
In the Daily News article Eleanor Hill, a former federal prosecuter who led Congress’ 9/11 inquiry said that when you try someone in court, you have to use evidence you obtained legally and so the defendant could claim he was tortured and be freed.
Yeah, and I’m Jessica Simpson! Does this woman really believe that any court would let them go free? Puleeeze! These guys have made no secret of their ties to terrorism-the evidence is in their own words and previous actions, spoken and done of free will.
So I say, Bring… Them… On!!
The Bush Administration owes it to the American people. Short of nabbing bin Laden it’s the best thing they can do to give us some sense of real justice here. Then we won’t need to watch re enactments like the upcoming and somewhat dreaded ‘United 93’ for “closure”.(bet it breaks box office records).
Instead we can see the real thing to its conclusion, which would be a lot more comforting.





Excellent second post, too.
Can't say I approve of torture either, but, as near as I have been able to tell, neither does anyone in the elected government. The debate seems to be on whether to leave that as a option if needed, not as a policy.
The other issue seems to be endemic to jails of any kind. We have had much the same problems in our non political correctional facilities. I don't condone it, but it is the expected result when you put some human beings in complete control of other human beings without serious restrictions on their behavior.
You are a trauma nurse, you have seen what people can do to each other without the slightest trace of politics involved. Why expect any better behavior from the guards, or blame the ones much removed in the hierarchy from their actions. Do you really think masters of spin like the Republican adminstration would have condoned all those photographs if they had known about it? That tells me they weren't paying that close attention to what was happening, and really don't deserve the blame for it.
April 6, 2006 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
My concern is not so much about jails(that's a whole other issue), but of the fact that these Sept 11, 2001 conspirators should be prosecuted for the sake of the American public, rather than tortured in secret.
April 7, 2006 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Karen, Much of what you and I know about the 9/11 hijackers comes from what Khalid Sheik Mohammed purportedly told his interrogators. The 9/11 Commission bluntly informed us that it was not permitted to interview Mohammed nor his interrogators.
Are you willing to unconditionally accept that what you have been told thirdhand is what Khalid Sheik Mohammed told his interrogators?
If you haven't already done so, read Chapters 5 and 7 of the 9/11 Report which is available online. I had a lot of questions after reading those chapters. Generally, I wondered if this is how people act in real life.
The 9/11 Commission was openly skeptical about how Osama bin Laden met and selected Mohammed Atta to head the 9/11 mission. I f Kahlid Sheik Mohammed did not tell the truth about Atta or we were not told the truth about Atta, everything else we've been told has to brought into question.
From the early to mid-90s, Khalid Sheik Mohammed was an official employee of the government of Qatar while he traveled around the world in connection with trerrorist-related activities. Qatar is an ally. As far as I know, no one has explained the relationship between Mohammed and the ruling family of Qatar.
No explanantion was provided in the 9/11 report about how Mohammed financed his terrorist activities after he left his job in Qatar and before he showed up in Afghanistan.
The report is full of oddities. For example, we are told that Atta took a course in German in Cairo before he went to Germany and then became proficient in German. But the report never tells us when Atta became proficient in English. Remember, Atta supposedly knew stuff like when Congress was due back from recess.
Ayman al-Zawahiri is portrayed as Osama bin Laden's #2 man but, according to the 9/11 report, he was not told about the 9/11 mission until the summer of 2001. That striles me as odd.
The report stated that Osama bin Laden told important visitors during the summer of 2001 that a big attack was coming but the report never identifies the important visitors.
I have to stop here but before I do, let me remind you that the Zaid Jarrah, one of the pilots, tried to buy four GPS units in Florida on August 22, 2001. According to 9/11 report, he was only able to obtain one GPS unit and three aeronautical maps a few days later. Does this sound like a team ready to fly in the front door of the Pentagon three weeks later?
BTW, I'm looking for Johnelle Bryant. If you have any info about her, let me know.
April 8, 2006 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Umm, What exactly do you intend to do if you figure out all the details? I mean, it is not exactly as if you are in a position to bring charges against anyone, and there are plenty of people accusing 9/11 of being a conspiracy without having the slightest effect.
April 8, 2006 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have no idea who Johnelle is, or why you asked me that, sorry
April 9, 2006 11:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Karen, I asked about Johnelle Bryant in case anyone reading your post had any interest in her. Bryant was a USDA employee who made a big splash in the news in June 2002 by claiming to have interviewed Mohammed Atta in the USDA Homestead Florida office about a cropduster loan in April 2000 before Atta was supposed to have first entered the US.
Recently, I brought her up her name again here and in the Cunning Realist. A couple of years ago, I tried to find her in Florida but couldn't. At the time, I read that she had only been transferred to Homestead from Washington DC three months before she claimed she met with Atta and then, after being in the news, was wisked away by the federal government. Now I thought enough time might have passed that she and the federal government might have let their guard down and Bryant could be "findable".
I could have sworn I saw Johnelle Bryant interviewed on CBS 60 Minutes but there is no record of a Bryant interview in the 60 Minutes archives or in Google or in Lexis-Nexis. On the hand, there no record of the Johnelle Bryant interview in the ABC News archives either although Lexis-Nexis lists some ABC video interviews in its archives (but not one for ABC World News in NY).
Many of the returns from a Google search for "Johnelle Bryant" refer to the ABC News interview including one from the BBC. Oddly enough, Lexis-Nexis only lists a few references to Johnelle Bryant in a search of newspapers and the papers are mostly foreign ones like the Toronto Star.
I live in Huntington on Long Island and I watched the Johnelle Bryant interview intently because I was very interested in what the media reported about 9/11. I thought her story sounded preposterous but whether it was CBS or ABC, a mainstream news organization was giving this woman prime time to air her story which was scary if true.
Johnelle Bryant claimed that Mohammed Atta came to her office with other men not once but twice. She was quite specific about her conversations with him. No other USDA employees from Homestead were interviewed as far as I know.
Johnelle Bryant is or was a federal employee. Federal employees do not go to major networks with stories about 9/11 hijackers unless they have been cleared by the federal government to do so. Remember, this was June 2002. Major news networks have the responsiblity to check stories from people like Johnelle Bryant before they put them on television, especially ones about 9/11.
People scoff at the so-called "9/11 conspiracy theorists" but I think they got the Johnelle Bryant story right. This website, 911Review.org, provides information about Johnelle Bryant. It gives a link to the USDA phone directory, for one. I checked the USDA directory and Johnelle Bryant is still listed at "202-690-1728 FSA" in Agency Room 5434 in Building SOAGRIBG. I called the number a little while and got a message from Johnelle Bryant saying that she is moving to Miami. Johnelle says to call "202-720-1472" if you need help. I think I'll call tomorrow.
I searched Intelius.com and found Johnelle Bryants (ages 39,43,47) in Hononlulu Hawaii and a Johnelle Bryant (age 30) in Fort Meyers Florida. The one in Fort Meyers might be related to Deborah D. Bryant. I can't afford to spend money on a full report but I would if I could.
I'd really like to know what made Johnelle Bryant's story credible. When did Bryant first report her interviews with Atta to the FBI? Who else in the Homestead office was interviewed by the FBI and when? When did Bryant start work in Homestead and does she still work there? Where did she live in Florida? Is she married? Does the USDA Homestead office keep visitor logs? Did anyone else remember Atta and several other Arab men visiting the office? Who did she first report the Atta visit to and when? Who arranged the ABC News interview? Who in the federal government cleared Bryant's interview?
Johnelle Bryant was held up to ridicule by conservatives in the media because she tried to accommodate Atta instead of reporting his suspicious behavior. Conservatives claimed she was a prime example of what is wrong with multiculturalism. I'm not familiar with him but last year, Mark Steyn, a conservative columnist, referred to Bryant's "multiculturalism outreach" and the fact that she ignored Atta's remark about destroying national monuments.
The 9/11 Commission omitted any reference to Johnelle Bryant in the 9/11 report but no mainstream news organization, as far as I know, ever pursued the Johnelle Bryant story after the initial stories in June 2002
I'd really like to know whether ABC is a credible news organization and whether Johnelle Bryant's story was an example of government propaganda. If her story was not true, her fellow employees might have been afraid to say anything back in June 2002 but maybe they feel differently now. Then again, maybe Johnelle Bryant really is one of the dumbest people on the face of the planet.
(And does anyone else besides me remember Johnelle Bryant on "60 Minutes"?)
April 10, 2006 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Karen, I found a 6/14/02 AP Press story on the SF Indymedia.org website about Johnelle Bryant but I haven't checked the Seattle Times archives. The AP story did not show up in Lexis-nexis. Heres' the entire story:
Hijacker tried to get U.S. loan to buy plane
by The Associated Press Friday, Jun. 14, 2002 at 4:51 PM
MIAMI A Department of Agriculture official says Sept. 11 terrorist ringleader Mohamed Atta tried to obtain a $650,000 government loan to buy a small plane, saying he intended to outfit it with a large chemical tank, and asked questions about Seattle and other U.S. cities.
Johnell Bryant, a loan officer in South Florida, said Atta visited her in the spring of 2000, saying he had just arrived from Afghanistan and hoped to earn his pilot's license and buy a plane to use for charter flights and for crop-dusting.
"He wanted to finance a twin-engine, six-passenger aircraft and remove the seats," Bryant told ABC's "World News Tonight" in an interview broadcast yesterday. "He said he was an engineer, and he wanted to build a chemical tank that would fit inside the aircraft and take up every available square inch of the aircraft except for where the pilot would be sitting."
Bryant said Atta also asked about security at the World Trade Center and about Seattle, Chicago and Los Angeles. He showed particular interest in Texas Stadium, home of the NFL's Dallas Cowboys, she said.
Law-enforcement officials said Bryant passed a lie-detector exam and that parts of her story were corroborated by captured Osama bin Laden lieutenant Abu Zabaydah, ABC said.
Bryant said Atta used his real name when she interviewed him.
"I spelled it A-T-T-A-H, and he told me, 'No, A-T-T-A, as in Atta boy!' " Bryant said.
Bryant said she rejected Atta for a loan because he was not a citizen. Before he left, Atta tried to buy a panoramic photo of Washington, D.C., hanging on her wall. He pointed specifically to the White House and Pentagon and called the photo "one of the prettiest" he had seen of the capital.
"He pulled out a wad of cash. He wanted that picture really bad."
Bryant said she explained that the picture had been a gift.
"His look on his face became very bitter at that point," she said. "I believe he said, 'How would America like it if another country destroyed that city and some of the monuments in it' like the cities in his country had been destroyed?"
She recalls Atta mentioning al-Qaida and bin Laden, saying he "would someday be known as the world's greatest leader."
"I didn't know who Osama bin Laden was. He could have been a character on 'Star Wars' for all I knew," Bryant said.
Bryant said she never reported the incident before Sept. 11.
"Should I have picked up the telephone and called someone? You can't ask me that more often than I have asked myself that," she said. "I don't know how I could possibly expect myself to have recognized what that man was. And yet sometimes I haven't forgiven myself."
seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/134469770_atta07.html
April 10, 2006 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, now I'm getting creeped out. When I searched ABC News for "Johnelle Bryant" earlier today, I was at the library. Although ABC News did not have a record of Johnelle Bryant, there were returns for "Johnelle Bryant" from several search engines including Ask.com on the ABC website.
I just tried ABC News again and I got only Google which returned no "Johnelle Bryant" entries on the ABC website. It offered me the option searching "public content" and "public content and secured content". I tried "public content and secured" but got the "Cannot find server" error message.
I never heard of "public content and secured" but I'd sure like to know more about it. But why are there two different versions of ABC News search?
When I search "Johnelle Bryant" on the regular Google website, I get returns for Johnelle Bryant.
So what gives?
April 10, 2006 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe somone here knows about Google and secured content so here's the link to my search on ABC - http://search.abcnews.go.com/search?q=johnelle+bryant&btnG=Google+Search&access=p&output=xml_no_dtd&sort=date%3AD%3AL%3Ad1&ie=UTF-8&client=abcnews&oe=UTF-8&proxystylesheet=abcnews&site=abcnews
April 10, 2006 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I called the USDA today and a very helpful employee told me that Johnelle Bryant worked for the Farm Service Agency. The agency was only set up in 1993, according to the FSA website. I'd like to know more about the FSA and when I have time, I will check out the website which looks to be very informative.
As an aside and I can't say it often enough, if you have questions about your government, call the government. So far, everyone I have spoken to in Washington DC has been more than helpful.
I was also told that Johnelle Bryant moved to Miami. It's too late to call the FSA office in Florida City but I'm going to send an email to William Croman, the FSA manager there and ask him about Johnelle Bryant. What's the worst that could happen? He doesn't answer? I know I'm not the only one`who is interested in Johnelle Bryant's story.
I noticed the USDA website has a specific warning that visitors can and will be monitored. I don't remember seeing a similar warning on other government websites but I've always assumed it was the case. I don't agree with the policy but I don't have a say in the matter, much to my disappointment.
If it were up to me, those PACER court records would be available for free to everyone. And I would not keep a record of who was accessing them. It's not the government's business. The state of Texas is annoying like that, too. You can't search the corporate database without providing a credit card. Texas wants to know who's looking at their records.
I know this is heresy in Democratic circles but whatever Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris have done wrong in the past was more than offset by the implementation of the Florida record system. The state of Florida is a shining example of how to give citizens access to their own government. Florida is truly the "Sunshine State".
I'd like to see a lot more records online. Why can't I see proposed bills in Congress before they are passed or, at least, after they are passed? I'm someone who is willing to pore over pages and pages of dry text to find the earmarks. Congress wants earmarks, fine, but let us poor slobs at least know what they are.
Anyone who runs on the platform of more transparency in government gets my vote.
April 11, 2006 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every communications system in the world has that monitoring clause. You have to monitor communications systems constantly, to keep them operating, and without that clause, they couldn't do it legally. For example, operating a firewall or antivirus software is considered monitoring. (How do you tell it's a virus if you don't examine it?)
It doesn't necessariy mean they are eavesdropping, though, usually they don't have the resources to waste on that. Usually what they have is some mechanism to indicate abuse is occuring, which starts the monitoring process.
April 11, 2006 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm trying out for the team is what I'm doing. Even before 9/11, I knew corruption in government and business was pervasive but I don't know the full extent of it. If our system of government can be saved, I want to help.
For four years, I've been demonstrating how to search records online and look at factss in a different way. I'm a good auditor (but a lousy accountant) so this is what I can contribute.
At the same time, I can show how bad the corruption is because the crooks are so easy to catch from the comfort of my home.
I don't know what anyone else is doing or if they are doing anything. You wouldn't tell me, that's for sure. I can't keep my mouth shut. I just know I'm not the only who bought into the truth, justice and the American way bit.
April 9, 2006 5:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't tell you? Why not? I am just a hobbyist OSINT researcher like you, except that I respect the government, and I study sino american relations, rather than internal affairs as you do.
Your other comment did hurt, though, so if that was your intention, you scored a bullseye; I have sacrificed a hell of a lot more than just about anyone this side of Richard Jewell for the Truth, Justice and American Way bit.
I don't deserve that comment. I have a better right to pull that rabbit out of my hat than you, especially when you are sitting there in the comfort of your own home. There are some of us who made sacrifices willingly, gave up irreplaceable things, gave up our futures.
Still, I often defend the government. It is OUR government, warts and all, and most of it's pretty good, comparatively speaking. I am still a progressive, and I still think we can improve it, and I still think the progressives are important to the future of America.
Being progressive does not mean hating America, and it doesn't mean hating Republicans. I don't like the neocons, I think their actions have hurt America terribly, and that the Progressives lack of power has hurt America even more.
But I don't think most Repubicans are corrupt traitors, either. That's an awfully serious accusation to throw simply because you don't like losing the election or that because you disagree with their policies.
And yes, there is corruption, lots of it. But most of the time, the only reason it is tolerated is because the alternative is even worse. Like it or not, it is human beings who make up a civilization, and a lot of them require bribery or worse to do their role in life. Short of Judgement Day, I don't think we are going to erase that out of the human soul.
The government is not a bunch of corrupt, evil masterminds plotting to take over the world, it is a bunch of ordinary people way out of their depth, doing the best they can and making a lot of mistakes in the process. And yes, sometimes they tolerate corruption, becausee they have more important things to do. And sometimes they are corrupted, human beings are vulnerable that way.
Most people don't have any problem with that. We can't shut down the country because it isn't perfect. The best we can hope for is keep it running as best we can and pray we haven't made too bad a set of mistakes, because frankly, I don't know anybody on the planet who knows how to run a country this size, let alone in rivalry with all the other countries out there.
That doesn't mean that corruption is ignored, it just means that there is tradeoffs that have to be considered; we as a people have to prioritize what problems we tackle, and there is a never ending line of problems still waiting for our attention.
And we don't always win. Sometimes, the bad guys win and sometimes they don't. And sometimes, even the Devil himself is confused as to whether he won or lost. That's the real world for you; go figure.
But consider this about your OSINT efforts. Do you think you can tell from public records, the difference between corruption, a sting, and a political deal to solve a more serious problem or catch a bigger fish? Because if you can't, you may be aiding corruption more than harming it, or risking the lives of those that actually are doing something about corruption.
Don't get me wrong. You are a very impressive person, with a lot of talent, and probably well meaning as well. I just think you really haven't thought this thing through very well if you think that your efforts are being ignored because the people you are sending them to are corrupt. It is far more likely you really don't understand the context of the information you are uncovering, because it isn't in the public records.
There are lots of people who do OSINT, its a very common hobby. I do it myself at times, it's a great stress reliever, like the worlds largest crossword puzzle. There are even a lot of private organizations that make money off of it, like Stratfor.
The important point is what you DO with it. Most people don't do anything, because they know its just an amateur effort. But by all means, if you figured out something, send it in.
But don't get mad because your never hear of it being acted on, because the world is not a game of cowboys and indians, it's complicated, and there are much more important things than letting you know your efforts are appreciated, or not.
April 9, 2006 7:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
randy, Let me try again. I'm a former "Big Eight" auditor and controller. Between 1998 and 2001, I worked at five different companies here on Long Island in five different industries and major fraud was committed at each one. That it was so casually carried out disturbed me.
I had a lot of time in the '90s to watch the massive amounts of wealth systematically transferred to people with power. The IPOS were fixed. You had to know someone to get on the gravy train.
One of the five companies I mentioned above was a bankrupt local telephone company in which a prominent Wall Street investment banker was working with organized crime. Another prominent Wall Street investment banker tried to swindle this company's vendors. From that one little telecom, I figured out myself how the worldwide telecom scandal was carried out.
I'm not picking on the Republicans. We all remember Terry McAuliffe's crooked Global Crossing deal. BTW, McAuliffe later teamed up with Al D'Amato on the Telergy deal. Telergy was a NY telelcom whose books were so cooked, the ipo had to be called off.
The people running the show don't care about democracy. They invest their money in communism. Doing business in China is easy because there is no rule of law. You pay the Communist Party and that's all there is to it. I hate to even bring up the Carlyle Group but it did hire the former Chinese finance minister who must be a communist.
I'm losing track of time but I think the Wall Street Journal carried an article about Stuart Bowen, Bush's own inspector general for the reconstruction of Iraq in July 2005. He reported that $9 billion targeted for Iraq reconstruction was stolen. I believe most of it was cash. The Coalition Provisional Authority had responsibility for the money. The CPA didn't let Iraqis steal $9 billion, the CPA stole it. Any Democrats in Washington DC up in arms about $9 billion being stolen?
Earlier today, I wrote about the anthrax attacks. I threw out some ideas mostly to remind everyone that the anthrax murders were unsolved. Since the strain of anthrax was American, the killer(s) are likely to be Americans. In the wake of the anthrax murders, Congress immediately spent $3 billion. Spending on bio-terrorism by 2005 was something like $4 or $5 billion. Money as a motive for murder? Happens all the time.
What is so very wrong about the anthrax attacks is that no one in Washington DC will ever talk about them. Where is the anger about the lowlifes who terrorized an already traumatized nation? Why can't we have an open discussion about the possibility of Americans committing one of the worst acts of terroism in American history? Everyone spends like another anthrax attack is around the corner but no one acts like they are looking for the pepetrators of the last ones. Robert Mueller is hardly ever seen in public, for example.
Say Americans did collude on 9/11 and say Americans did commit the anthrax murders. They, whoever "they" might be, are not going to stop terrorizing us all on their own. But I don't know if Americans are behind 9/11 and the anthrax attacks. I know that I don't have enough information to come to any conclusion.
I picked the 9/11 report apart because it is the only "official" document about 9/11 that I have access to. 600,00 copies of the report were sold. If I have questions, so do other people but I never hear from them. Right after 9/11, I took it for granted there would be cops, firemen and Wall Streeters who would be determined to make sure they knew everything there was to know about 9/11. Four years have gone by and the only
9/11 questions I read about on the internet are about whether Builidng #7 was wired for explosives.
If people in NYC are not offended by the vice chairman of the NY-NJ Port Authority making a million bucks from fake anti-terrorism equipment while dead bodies were being pulled from the rubble of the WTC (owned by the Port Authority), what do they care about? Charlie Gargano has ultimate responsibility for security at the airports and the ports in NYC and he openly does business with organized crime while in office. I can prove it.
I suspect Charlie Gargano was the bagman for the Bush administration and picked up cash from the Libyans when he went to Malta in May 2003 but I can't prove it. So I wrote about my suspicions in case someone who was not familiar with Gargano's background was checking out corruption.
I think Gargano arranged the bizarre industrial accident that shut down offshore gas drilling in Trinidad in June 1991 but I can't prove it either. I know the people in Trinidad think the accident was suspicious enough to post about it on the government website. Gargano was the ambassador to Trinidad and he left the country in June 1991. By 1992, Enron had taken over the the very lucrative offshore gas contracts in Trinidad from the company that experienced the bizarre industrial accident.
I know how to read 990s, SEC filings and corporate registrations. Somemtimes I have access to Lexis-Nexis. That's about the extent of my resources but I try and work them as best I can. Yesterday, someone here wrote about these astroturf immigration right wing think tanks. I spent a couple of hours putting together some info to document how they are linked together. If she can use the info, great. Meanwhile, I learned something and some of the names from my comments will show in a Google search.
A few days ago, I wrote to someone in Texas who appears to be a politically active progressive. I ran some info about Tom DeLay's "charitable" undertakings by her. Some of the info involved a very wealthy Texas foundation. She knew about some of the foundation's past problems. I'm hoping she can do something with what I found. I'm not from Texas so I couldn't go any further.
Last month, Josh Marshall mentioned a defense contractor, Matthew Pushkin and his mysterious White House contract. For fun, I put together a possible scenario involving the White House and a company that pushes up search engine rankings.
I found a Mississippi company registered to the Louisiana Coushatta Indians which previously was registerered to Travis Lott. Right away, I started asking here in the TPM Cafe if Travis was related to Trent. I still don't know if he is but a week after I posted about the Coushattas, they changed the names of the company's officers on the Mississippi secretary of state website. When I got access to Lexis-Nexis back the other day, I found out that Travis Lott really is a crook and I later figured out that the company was doing with Harrah's. At the very least, I think we can say the Coushattas were not Jack Abramoff's "victims".
randy, You and I know how to do this kind of research but a lot of people don't. I'm trying to show them the basics. If I can help in anyway, I'm happy to do it. People need to understand how weak and ineffective government institutions like the IRS and the SEC have become as a result of deliberate underfunding and deregulation. I see the situation as dangerous and a threat to our freedom.
In a million years, I never meant to imply you didn't care about our country or wouldn't make sacrifices for it. I just meant that I personally don't know what anyone else is doing about the really serious stuff. There's a lot of very dangerous people in this world, don't think I don't know it, but I'd stick my neck out to get rid of them if I could.
Anyway, that's enough from me for the day. Thank you so very much for the compliments. They are always appreciated. I haven't responded to your other comment but I will and if the offer to email you is still open, I may take you up on it.
April 9, 2006 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I was a occcasional research analyst on Telcomm, so I know a lot about that area. You are right, there is corruption in Telecomm.
What you don't realize is that sometimes corruption is necessary for the system to work.
Take spectrum auctions. for example. At one point, they tried a completely corruption free system where anyone could bid for spectrum. What happened was that the winners could not afford to finance the company necessary to use the spectrum and it was eventually return. incidently, the Telcos didn't interfere with those small companies, they knew what it took to do the job, and they knew those small companies would fail on their own.
Regular accounting isn't going to tell you things like that, what you need to understand is a branch of economics known as institutional economics, that studies transaction costs and social structure. Corruption is only a bad when it increases transaction costs over a non corruption approach.
You are wrong about China, it has a strong system of law, just not one you are familiar with. Luckily the Internet Center for Corruption Research has a wonderful paper on it, thats also a good introduction to institutional economic analysis. http://www.icgg.org/downloads/contribution10_schramm.pdf
On Iraq, you have to realize you are dealing with a different culture, where bribes are common. On an Operation the size of the War, that amount going for miscellaneoius bribes does not seem unreasonable, it is pretty much a guarantee that the Iraqi's charged the US under the counter bribes to get anything done over there. I know you are going to hate this next sentence but if you understand middle east institutions, the war in Iraq didn't have anything out of the ordinary to it, no unique corruption, we just aren't used to the culture., and even though they are an American company, they behave like a native ofthe country they are in.
It isn't just Arabs, either. During Katrina, MRE's were a form of currency, and many of the relief organizaitons traded them to get things they needed to help people. Later on, it looked like corruption to auditors.
The anthrax attacks were interesting in the fact that the investigators never framed anybody, that tells me they really don't know what happened. That limits it to a lone individual, unconnected to a source of anthrax, or they would have found him. It's not like you can pick up chemical grade anthrax at the local drug store. I don't think it is on the front burner because it never happened again, not because noone was scared. I know I was, and I don't scare easy.
It had to be a postal employee. Chemical weapon grade anthrax is incredible hard to handle even for experts, if it had to be transported more than a few feet, or even in a mailbag from a postal drop box, it should have left a trail of bodies. That means it was poured somewhere near the sorting machine where it was detected. Only postal employees can get that close, and not even most of them.
The Port Authority issue was not unique. All over America, companies took the liberty of selling inadequate or damaged equipement to first responders. They even had a senate hearing on it a year or two ago. The general consensus was that the purchasers didn't know the equipment was bad. I mean, how do you field test a radiation suit without killing someone if you don't have special facilities for it?, as most purchasers didn't.As for Gargano, read Confessions of an Economic Hit Man You will understand whats really happening a lot more. It is not entirely accurate, but it is close enough. If you are really interested, purchase a StratFor contract ($350 for a personal subscription), they probably covered it at the time.
You don't understand how the stock market really works if you think the SEC is weak. It just that it's mission is to keep confidence in the Stock Markets strong, not to punish people. It has done an incredible job in doing that. You don't see most of that, because they rarely see a use for making things public; all that usually does is undermine confidence in the markets.
One other point about your earlier post. If you are finding anything bad about the Clintons, it is almost certainly something else. The reason is simple. Everyone knows the Republicans will shower promotions and raises on anyone coming up with dirt on the Clintons.
The only thing that is preventing the Clintons from being framed is the fact that everyone knows that they won't even bother with a trial if you are caught framing a Senator or First Lady. Some things are in the interest of both political parties.
The Clintons realize this, and are careful not to do anything that can be used against them, they have their eyes on the ultimate prize, the first husband wife presidential team with three or more periods in office. Besides, there are far too many ways they can make money legally..You don't think whole NATIONS owe favors to the ex president?
April 10, 2006 5:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
randy, I think the CPA stole $9 billion or most of it, anyway. If I could, I'd put Michele Ledeen up against the wall and threaten her into telling me what was going on over there. Let's see how big and brave she really is without bodyguards. If we could catch her near a dark alley...
$350 for a Stratfor contract? You've got to be kidding. I only have acces to Lexis-Nexis sometimes because a couple of law students help me with the research (strictly within N-L guidelines, btw). Researching crooks on the internet is costing me money. I'm supposed to be looking for a job but I'm having more fun figuring out if Travis Lott is related to Trent Lott than I would have collecting somebody's dead receivables or stretching accounts payable.
You are so wrong about Charlie Gargano and Eagle Building Technologies. Eagle's financials were phony before 9/11. Between Eagle, related subs, Eagle's president and wife, more than $230k was contributed to the Republicans before 9/11. A substantial portion went to Gov. Pataki. Eagle's president, Anthony M. D'Amato and his wife, Gabriella, attended the Governors Ball during the first Bush inauguration.
Anthony M. D'Amato (apparently no relation to Senator Al) was first hooked up with Sealant Solutions, now Powerchannel. Sealant formerly was UC NWIN Systems and before that, Winners Edge. According to a great article by Leslie Eaton in the August 2002 NYT, Gargano was an investor. So he probably was the one who connected D'Amato to Pataki et al.
James "Cary" Parrish was president of Sealant in February 2002 when Sealant placed $250k of its stock privately and then invested the $250k in IFG Goldstar Cement, a front for Buck Showalter. The SEC has been after Showalter for a long time. According to SEC records, Showalter was in Lebanon some time around 2000 and spent six months in Ukraine in 2001.
Parrish then became president of Andros Development International Corporation, a private company which was first registered at sunbiz.org in 2001. Gargano, along with Sir Orville Turnquest, Gene Brehm, Lord Charles Spencer Churchill and Alfred V. Grecco, was a director. I kept copies of the website.
Prior to his stint as president of Sealant Solutions, Parrish was a vice president of Digital Products of Delaware, Inc. in 2000 (see sunbiz.org.). The company provided monitoring of electronic bracelets worn by prisoners confined to their homes, of all things. Digital Products is owned by Richard Kurtz, a New Jersey real estate developer who has long been in the penny stock company. He was the chairman of Urecoats, now Lapolla Industries. Urecoats was formerly Winners All International. Charlie Gargano was a director of Winners All until 1999.
James "Cary" Parrish and Anthony M. D'Amato got bagged in the famous joint FBI and RCMP sting named "Operation Bermuda Shorts". Parrish was sentenced to four years and is out of prison now. D'Amato got nine years for his part in Bermuda Shorts and for falsifying Eagle's financials. See SEC.
Meyer Berman is an investor worth $400 million and a well-known contributor to the Democrats. He went to dinners at the Clinton White House twice. In February 2001, he and Sam Gejdenson, former congressman from Connecticut whose district included Foxwoods, joined the Eagle board. Berman also "invested" in Eagle.
Berman had also invested sometime in late 2000 or early 2001 in Biosterile Technologies, a Fort Wayne Indiana company owned by former members of the military. Paul or Albert Reichmann, one of them, along with Arthur Goldberg and some others were also investors or on Biosterile's board. Biosterile's website is still available in the wayback machine.
Biosterile had a roster of Russian scientists working for it in Moscow and had received US State Dept. aid because it employed Russians.
According to a 9/01/01 article in a Fort Wayne newspaper about the Biosterile president being fired, Biosterile expected a big jump in sales in the latter part of 2001.
On its pre-9/11 website, Biosterile boasted of having sold three of its cargo scanning machines to military in Turkey. But as it came out after 9/11, these machines never worked. You just know that the Trukish government did not pay for these machines with their own money. If I remember correctly, Douglas Feith was the "liason" between the US and the Turkish military i.e. he got a kickback on all sales financed by the US.
Biosterile was listed as a vendor of bomb-detecting equipment for the US Navy. Again, the stuff never worked. Biosterile was also on the board of an aviation safety group. Nice, huh?
Biosterile also was in the food radiation business and employed a lobbyist who represented it at the FDA. I found a Biosterile in Oak Ridge Tennessee but I don't if it is the same company. Scanmex LLC was a Biosterile sub.
After 9/11, Eagle announced that it had bomb-detecting equipment which was Biosterile's fake cargo scanning equipment. After the anthrax attacks, it anounced that it had mail steriization equipment but the machine had never actually been built. I then announced it had software to detect money laundering but that was fake, too.
Eagle ostensibly was in the construction business so it had teamed up with Biosterile in an undisclosed relationship to sell this garbage to the federal government. No explanation was ever offered publicly as to why Biosterile needed Eagle. BTW, Biosterile filed Chapter 7 in June 2002.
Prior to May 2001, Eagle was "Eagle Capital International Ltd." A stream of press releases from Eagle Capital would have made an investor think the company was doing business worldwide. China, Russia, India, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Saudi Arabia, Yugolsavia and so on. Andros Savvides of the Excel Group and Wilfred Mango of Fuller International, two major contractors, wre on the board along with Gargano pre-9/11. Yet Charlie afterwards said he knew nothing, nothing at all about Eagle's operations. Right, a major contributor to Pataki and Gargano knew nothing.
In August 2000, Eagle first announced that it had some sort of financial interest in an Italian manufacturer of bombproof doors. In a May 1, 2001 8-K, Eagle announced that i bought 85% of the company, Masters SRL located in Piacenza Italy. I don't care what anyone says about me but I want the FBI to check this one out to see if Eagle was gearing up for a terrorist attack. As I have already proved, none of these so-called prominent people had any qualms about defrauding the government after 9/11.
In fact, I'd like to know how the FBI knows how far these crooks will go. If Meyer Berman and Charlie Gargano are willing to cheat the government out of $50 million, how does the FBI know they wouldn't kill 3,000 people to get it? How does the FBI judge the morals of Charlie Gargano? Gargano has been in charge of spending billions of dollars of 9/11 aid. That kind of is awfully tempting.
Charlie Gargano has a history of associating with organized crime and the FBI knows it. For pete's sakes, I know it. When I worked at Orlando's Ristorante in Huntington on Long Island in 1979, he had conversations with Tony "Ducks" Corallo and Neil, as in Aniello "Neil" Migliore of the Lucchese family. BTW, Alphonse D'Amato made Orlando's a campaign stop during his 1980 run for the senate.
In 1992, Gargano invested in the Cornerstone Group which owned property in Martin County Florida. Oneof the other investors was Carmine Avellino, Sal's brother. Sal Avellino is in prison for the Kubecka murders. The Kubeckas were carters and Avellino, a member of the Lucchese family, didn't think they should be carters so he killed them.
In the mid-90s, the FBI was wiretapping a "social club" in Huntington because an illegal gambling ring was being run out of there by "Johnny Boy" Ambrosio. The FBI overheard someone talking about crashing planes and investigated that person. Fortunately, it turned out to be a misunderstanding (I better understand now why the FBI investigated) but all the same, the FBI clearly believed the mafia was capable of terrorism, as I'm sure it still does.
I don't need Stratfor to find out if Charlie Gargano is a crook or not. I've known that since 1979. He was part of the $2 billion Suffolk County Southwest Sewer District scandal. The only reason nobody went to jail is because the judges would have been putting their friends and relatives in prison so many people had their hand in the till. I still hear stories about the sewer district. One of the supervisors for a big construction companies told me at a wedding about how the county inspectors looked the other way.
I have to stop here because I'm out of energy but I'll respond to the rest of your post when I catch my breath. Unless, of course, you want to hear more about Charlie Garagano.
April 10, 2006 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, I didn't say Gargano wasn't a crook, I have no opinion on the subject; just that there are some things you might want to take into account, such as some of America's more interesting foreign policy techniques mentioned in the "Confessions of an economic hit man" book. The incident in Trinidad sounded like one of their operations.
I will state, however, that you are probably barking up the wrong tree on 9/11. I don't think the Mafia was involved.
For one thing, I know for a fact that organized crime is terrified of the big Wall Street firms,
Secondly, the fact that the WTC burned down was an incredible surprise to everybody. Planes have crashed into skyscrapers before without taking down the entire building, and the 1992 bombing of the WTC garage did not cause all that much real damage. Hard to see that they would plan something they would not expect to happen.
In addition most of the Wall Street firms were planning to move out of WTC at about that time, anyways. You might notice that nobody appears in a hurry to rebuild.
Beside, this is nowhere near organized crimes usual style, they rend to prefer to keep under the radar, not on it. They weren't involved prior or during the act. I would believe, however, that they would opportunistically grab a percentage of the graft afterwards.
April 11, 2006 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
randy, I said I don't need a $350 Stratfor contract to know Gargano is a crook nor did I have to read "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" to figure out what Gargano was doing in Trinidad. He was hardly ever there and when there was an uprising, the State Dept could not find him.
I've always been curious as to what the FBI background report said about him when George H. W. Bush appointed ambassador in 1988. I think it was '87 or '88 when NY Newsday ran a story about Gargano making a million bucks on a real estate deal in Brooklyn he did with a known member of the mafia. The FBI had to have had a file on Gargano from the Southwest Sewer District scandal. The FBI investigated the Lucchese family backwards and forwards in the '80s and Gargano, Mario Posillico, Carl Lizza, Sam Albicocco, etc were like this with the Luchese family.
Senator Alphonse D'Amato was the glue that held everyone together. I recently wrote here about a relative of "Johnny Boy" Ambrosio, a member of the Gambino family, who told me that a senator was a silent partner of Carl Lizza's. I assume it was Senator Al but I wasn't exactly bowled over when I heard the news. Ask anyone in NY if Senator Al is honest and they are guaranteed to laugh. Try it.
Until I searched the Wall Street Journal archinves, I had no idea that Enron was doing business on Long Island in the early '90s. Enron had a deal with Brooklyn Union Gas and, I think, Nassau County. Once, I went through every Enron entity registered in NYS and found some interesting stuff. LOL - There is an Enron Industries Inc. at 213 Route 110, Huntington NY 11746 that was registered to "Mr. Smith". I am convinced that the real Enron paid off the NY politicians through that Enron. Of course, given that we are dealing with NYS, we have no idea about when the corporation was dissolved or anything else about Enron Industries.
Most people on Long Island don't know that Enron had a long term contract with Brooklyn Union Gas. At least I think it's Brooklyn Union. I'm doing this from memory but it's all in the WSJ archives. I was even nosy enough to track Richie Kessel's checkered career.
Kessel now heads LIPA, our local energy company that is being sucked dry by Pataki, Gargano et al. Long Islanders are going to be left with a shell corp. And to think they complained about LILCO! Somebody should ask Kessel why he spent $3 million on a forensic audit in, I think, 2003 or 2004. I read it in the LIPA financials online but never had time to go back to it. I'd also like to know LIPA got hooked up with Constellation, a Sam Wily deal involving an upstate NY nuclear plant. I just know Long Islanders are going to get stuck for a few billion on that one.
People on Long Island can be so dense. Richie Kessel is a freeloader who had his free wedding at the Jones Beach outdoor theater and gave his guests free tickets to a concert held there that night. I highly doubt Kessel, the sponge, paid for those concert tickets. No one else is permitted to hold their wedding at Jones Beach but Kessel, the parasite, didn't care how he looked to anyone else. El Cheapo wanted a freebie. The bum and his freeloading bride make damned good money and they should have paid for their own goddamn wedding held elsewhere if you ask me. Trust Kessel to look after your money like it was his own?
Getting back to the mafia, what makes you more expert than the FBI? The FBI thought the mafia could be involved in terrorism in the mid-'90s. A coupleof months ago, someone told me that Nastasi-White, a NCY mafia construction company, had 60,000 sheets of plywood on hand on 9/11 that was used to board up windows around the WTC. The person implied that the amount of plywood on hand was unusually large. There was no discussion about mafia involvement in 9/11, in fact, there was no other discussion at all. That's all I was told. The person who told me does not even work for Nastasi-White.
I'm not calling the FBI to tell them about Nastasi-White. One, I don't want to say who told me and two, I don't want to give my name to the FBI. Three, my local FBI office is much too close to Charlie Gargano for my comfort. I know for a fact that Senator Al used to drop in at Nastasi-White and pick up cash. Confidentiality is a real big issue here and I don't need the FBI giving my name to Frank Gargano, Charlie's nephew, when he drops in to shoot the breeze.
Why would I write about Nastasi-White online? Because if there is something to the story, the FBI should know about it. 9/11 is an open investigation of the worst terrorist act in this country's history and I'm not in a position to say the mafia is or is not involved in 9/11. So I wrote about Nastasi-White and the plywood in the Cunning Realist blog and here. The Cunning Realist is a NYC finance executive and I know he is very interested in the 9/11 investigation. I trust him to pass the info on to the right person. I also think some people pay attention to me here who are interested in 9/11. If someone really needs to know more, I'm not too hard to find. If Nastasi-White just happened to have a lot of plywood on 9/11 for one reason or another, end of story.
I don't why you said the collapse of the WTC was an incredible surprise. I was with the beau when the second plane hit and he is an ex-volunteer fireman (and NYS FD state tournament champion). He said right away that the buildings would collapse but he expected them to collapse within a day, not an hour.
Right after 9/11, I wrote that I wanted the FBI to check whether any construction companies had ordered new equipment recently. I wanted hotel reservations analyzed to see if anyone anticipated a need for rooms in NYC after 9/11. I wanted the service records of the planes scrutinized for any unaccounted for time. I didn't trust anyone.
Osama bin Laden was the least of my concerns.
April 11, 2006 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I said it because a plane hit the empire state building and didn't do more than local damage. I have never heard of another case where a plane hitting a skyscraper destroyed the skyscraper,
Why would anyone order more equipment before they got the contract? There is boound to be intense competitionfor those contracts, there is no gaurantee even the most well connected company would win.
In addition, noone would reserve hotel rooms in NYC, it is obvious the city would be a unhealthy place to stay for a few weeks,
If anything, they would either have chosen Newark, Jersey City, Princeton/Trenton/Lawrenceville, Shorthills, or (more likely) the northern buroughs.
What you really need to look for is real estate activity, since that does need considerable lead time and is impossible to erase off the books.
Umm, I am still curious as to the source of your anger. Are you trying to avenge a loved one injured or killed in the WTC attacks?
April 11, 2006 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink