Crisis in the Gulf
I am glad that we in Congress provided the Federal Emergency Management Agency with the additional funds required to ensure that the needed rescue and recovery mission continues unimpeded. We have all seen on the television and read in the news papers about the current situation in the Gulf Coast. The images and stories are heartbreaking and deeply troubling, but they are of people we know and they are our fellow citizens. Many of us know people who live in New Orleans, might have been vacationing there, or were supposed to return to college this fall. These are our family members, our friends, and our neighbors, and we cannot let them down. My own sister lives in the heart of New Orleans and waited for evacuation for days without running water or power until she was finally rescued after waiting too long like thousands of others.
The essential role of government is to provide for its citizens in their time of need. Today, we cannot say that we have done a good job in that critical task. Too many of our own people are suffering in horrific conditions and there exists a general state of lawlessness in a few areas and more concerning is that many feel they have been abandoned. If we cannot meet the needs of these clearly desperate citizens in the Gulf Coast, we need to seriously reconsider our budget priorities and what we value as a society. I am troubled that the pleas of regional officials and those from cities like New Orleans for an increased federal commitment to guard against such storms have not been heeded over the past few years
It is my deep hope that the federal government, with the money we provided last week, will ensure that order is restored to the affected region and that no one anywhere in the Gulf Coast is without food, water or shelter. But in the weeks and months ahead we need also to ensure that the proper resources are dedicated to guarantee that a tragedy like this and its indescribable scale is not repeated again. What that means is a commitment by the federal government to the people of America to meet their domestic needs. For too long this government has tried to do more with less, it has tried to provide for our people on the cheap. But this week has reminded us that there are too many critical tasks and services that only government can provide and that we ensure that the federal government provides the essential funding that these services require.
This terrible tragedy has also reminded us of the generous and compassionate nature of the American people. Already the Red Cross has received well over $100 million in donations to the relief effort. People all across America are emptying their coin jars and offering empty rooms to help in anyway they can. I know that this compassion will continue and I encourage all Americans to do what ever they can to help our fellow citizens in their most desperate time of need. However, I am troubled to see instances of greed in this time of desperate need. I have heard already from a number of my constituents who saw the price of gas skyrocket. I, along with other members of Congress, will be looking into any instances of price gouging. In such a time of despair for so many, price gouging can not be tolerated
Once again, I want to express my condolences to those who have lost loved ones in the wake of Hurricane Katrina and to share my prayers of hope for those who remain in despair. I know that much remains to be done and I am hopeful that the funding Congress provided will go along way to meeting the desperate needs of those in the Gulf Coast. The full story of this disaster remains to be told, but I am confident that out of dark moments of this tragedy will come beacons of light for those affected and a serious discussion about our true national priorities.





We have been very vigorously commenting on Katrina Rush...
There will be time later to assign the blame to the irresponsible parties. And the American people will demand accountability. But one thing is for sure, there was a systemic failure of our government to properly respond. This is completely unacceptable in both "Red and Blue" America. Never again when the lives of the American people are in danger can our government be unresponsive!!!
FEMA's response to Katrina was negligent. If the problem is govermental red tape, cut the tape. Make sure all the American people in future disasters get immediate and decisive help from our government. This time it was the Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama caosts...but it could have been any of us.
There by the grace of God...
September 6, 2005 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
"There by the grace of God... "
What is this God shit! Are you some kind of Christ-o-facist fundi troll?
September 6, 2005 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
No Mr. Brown far from it. I am someone who is very spiritual who has absolutely no use for organized religion...
You have a problem with that?
September 6, 2005 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
There will be time later to assign the blame to the irresponsible parties. And the American people will demand accountability.
Honestly, have you people been awake the past 4 1/2 years? How many times must you tell yourself, "This time they overstepped" or "The American people would never stand for this" before you realize that the Democratic Party needs to completely change the way it opposes this president to inflict substantial damage.
Where was the accountability for 9/11? What heads rolled? Last I looked those most responsible for America's defenses being down got promoted not fired.
Where is the accountability for the Iraq quagmire? What heads rolled? Last I looked the same people who got us in this mess, were still in charge.
Where is the accountability for the Plame affair? If not for the tireless efforts of Mr. Fitzgerald this would have never hit the pages.
To use a football analogy, this party is trying to control the clock by running the football, when we're down by three touchdowns with less than 5 minutes to play. It's time to put the bloody ball in the air for goodness sake. Now is the time to call for the resignation of Brown & Co. and the appointment of Lee Witt (the smartest move Blanco made all week was naming him and advisor). Now is the time to stop all funding for this war unless there is a major shift in leadership and more transparency.
Whether these battles are winnable or not is not the point. We're irrelevant anyway, because we're not in power. But if we don't go out shooting, then we lose all credibility to criticize come November.
September 7, 2005 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do agree DWCG...there has been no accountability the last 4 1/2 years. This is a different situation with a different dynamic. The president and his administration are (to use a boxing analogy) reeling from repeated body blows from across the political spectrum. People might overlook a lot, but never American civilians dying while the government does nothing...and they (red and blue) will demand accountability.
September 7, 2005 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
September 7, 2005 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just got back to my home in Michigan after being turned around down in Jackson, MS in my attempt to help the people of New Orleans. I heard many things on the radio on my trip down there. Is it true that Congress had appropriated money to fortify the very levees that broke, but George Bush vetoed the expenditure calling it "Pork".
Is Iraq so important that the needs of our own people cannot be taken care of until the people get togther after a disaster and donate money. I do not believe that our government did not have enough resources to provide water and food to the thirsty and starving people of New Orleans. Their only thought was to shoot those poor thirsty, staraving people for stealing food and water out of stores that were going under water anyway.
We say we are a moral country, but I sure don't see it in the actions of the government.
Pat Foster
September 6, 2005 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just got back to my home in Michigan after being turned around down in Jackson, MS in my attempt to help the people of New Orleans. I heard many things on the radio on my trip down there. Is it true that Congress had appropriated money to fortify the very levees that broke, but George Bush vetoed the expenditure calling it "Pork".
Is Iraq so important that the needs of our own people cannot be taken care of until the people get togther after a disaster and donate money. I do not believe that our government did not have enough resources to provide water and food to the thirsty and starving people of New Orleans. Their only thought was to shoot those poor thirsty, starving people for stealing food and water out of stores that were going under water anyway.
We say we are a moral country, but I sure don't see it in the actions of the government.
Pat Foster
September 6, 2005 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I pray that your confidence is not misplaced but I fear two more Katrina disasters lie before us. Cleanup will necessarily bring about an envronmental disaster as toxic waters drained into Lake Pontchartrain and the Mississippi could well kill everything in the waters and wetlands of Southeart Louisiana.
Reconstruction will be Katrina III. We are not simly rebuiling "homes, roads, businesses, and schools affected" as we are accustomed to doing in the wake of hurricanes past. The City of New Orleans no longer exists for all intents and purposes. The human capital that is the reason cities exist, their life force has been destroyed too. We are rebuling a City not a road, a house, a business. To do that sucessfully will require not only more money than I think any of us can imagine at this point, it will require central planning and governmental control, something that is anathema to the powers that be in DC these days.
For five years we've seen the promises that Bush has left behind...
Don't trust Bush...keep his feet to the fire....do that for the next 3 years and the City of New Orleans will have a shot at living again
September 6, 2005 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
. . . the needed rescue and recovery mission . . . .
Welcome aboard, Mr. Hunt; it's nice to have a scientific mind among us.
My question is whether the term "recovery" includes the activity of rebuilding. And if it does, whether the Democratic party will continue to support the destruction of Gulf coast wetlands, the federal insuring of beach-home McMansions, etc.
Or to put it differently, how much of my tax dollars should be spent to induce, by subsidization, people to build homes and establish businesses where rational risk evaluation would tell them not to?
September 6, 2005 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Make that, "Welcome aboard Mr. Holt." :-(
September 6, 2005 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw a diary entry this morning on the DailyKOS called "<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9/6/102826/1695 ">Rebuilding & Convergence</a>".
Some interesting thoughts are posted in it - are we up to the challenge as a nation to do anything along those lines?
September 6, 2005 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw a diary entry this morning on the DailyKOS called "Rebuilding & Convergence".
Some interesting thoughts are posted in it - are we up to the challenge as a nation to do anything along those lines?
(sorry if this repeats...I fubar'd the link)
September 6, 2005 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Deja vu all over again..I just read your post Plame Redux
Susan Collins called for an immediate Congressional inquiry... Bush says he's going to do one too! If it all sounds too familiar, it is.
He played the same game with Iraq and managed to thwart any comprehensive inquiry into that Bush disaster..he tried the same thing WRT 9/11...the Plame Game Frame
September 6, 2005 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Susan Collins called for an immediate Congressional inquiry...
Yeah; Billmon's got this one knocked.
September 6, 2005 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed.
I saw the happy couple on NewsHour
Gotta keep the pressure on those SOB's or sure as hell, this is gonna turn out just like the Big Iraq whitewash
September 8, 2005 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is my deep hope that the federal government, with the money we provided last week, will ensure that order is restored to the affected region and that no one anywhere in the Gulf Coast is without food, water or shelter
We all hope that, but that's all we have. Hope.
The Bush Administation has again proven itself to be incompetent. Incompetent to the point of needless deaths.
Same story in Iraq.
Why does anyone think they can do a competent job here? How many chances can they get?
The only hope I have is that Clinton's FEMA director is now on the ground. I hope he slaps Mike Brown silly.
And Republicans will, of course, take all the credit. Get the cameras rolling -- there are 2006 campaign commercials to shoot:
September 6, 2005 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really hope that you and the other Democratic members of Congress will loudly call for a repeal of the new bankruptcy law in the wake of Katrina. The law is going to unjustly increase the suffering of those who have already lost so much, by making them indebted forever for things that they have lost--and it will make it harder for them to start over. This type of disaster--whether on a grand scale or a private scale--is exactly what is ignored by the Republican Bankruptcy law. And now that the nation is finally paying attention to those who are struggling and suffering--it is the time to point out the cruelty of the new law and the reasons it must be repealed.
September 6, 2005 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely! In fact, I believe that it is your DUTY to the people you represent as well as those Americans devastated by this catastrophe to do everything you can to blockade these amendments. They already have less than nothing.
ds
September 7, 2005 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me that a lot of "blame" -- and Rep. Holt is wise in this post by not playing the blame game but focusing instead on today and tomorrow, not the past... -- should go to the Mayor of New Orleans.
After all this disaster occurred in his city. Any mayor who has a flawed disaster preparedness plan in place can shift blame no where but towards him/herself. The mayor of New Orleans is shifting blame towards the Feds clearly. Passing the buck.
His disaster preparedness plan went so far as to issue an emergency statement urging all residents of New Orleans to evacuate. But since he is the one who is responsible for knowing how many residents rely on public transportation, how many do not have cars, how many might be bedridden due to old age or illness, he should have had the foresight to have a public evacuation component in place in his disaster preparedness plan. No such offer was made by the City of New Orleans to provide public evacuation transportation.
Once the breakwater broke and New Orleans filled up like a bowl of soup, which half of America new could happen with a category 4 or 5 hurricane, the mayor then shifts the blame towards the Feds.
September 6, 2005 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
This sounds like a troll post to me. Firstly, I, for one, refuse to play the Scott McLellan game. I will not use the words "blame game", as he attempts to do. What we are talking about here is accountability--something which has been notoriously lacking in the Bush administration. Nor has our congress, our press, or anyone else seemingly been willing to ask for accountability during the tenure of this administration, except for private citizens, such as Cindy Sheehan. Secondly, the Mayor of New Orleans was out of the loop once Gov. Blanco requested, and received, designation for Louisiana as a fed. disaster area. The operative word here is FEDERAL, not local, regional, state or other. Thanks to putting FEMA under the control of political cronies with NO emergency management experience, the clowns in Washington spent 3 days trying to decide which agency actually had authority in this situation. The role of fed. govt is to protect the people and in this they failed miserably. As to not asking for immediate accountability, do you want the same jokers in charge in D.C. when the next hurricane hits and problems are compounded?
September 6, 2005 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, how about links to support anything you've said?
September 6, 2005 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Condolences will never erase the dismal failure of all members of Congress including yourself. Each member of Congress shares responsibility for the lack of infrastructure and the weakening of the United States as a world superpower. The President is responsible also.
Forgive my anger but I'm getting tired of these one night stand's that amount to nothing and are fruitless. When will you or colleagues use more than words to reconcile the continued evaporation of a successful democracy. This nation is being ruined by the spineless and the belligerent.
It takes more than talk to create change. It takes symbolism, when will a group of politicians take symbolic action to reconcile the failures? Do something besides talk! Do something besides being a puppet! Protest on the steps of Capitol Hill until your message is heard and creates effective change. NO MORE ONE NIGHT STAND'S!
In my opinion, all members have been inept at protecting our power and have failed the American public.
September 6, 2005 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
And quit ego stroking the American public, we know what we are! We're generous, passionate, and deeply concerned about the people affected in the Gulf Coast.
We're also deeply concerned about the instances of neglect that led to this moment and are ready for a political fallout. If there isn't one, get ready for mass emigration of those that are not in the other America. (the poor America)
September 6, 2005 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michael Parenti in Z magazine notes that, after a recent major hurricane hit Cuba, 1.3 million people (10% of their population) were successfully evacuated without a single loss of life.
The Wall Street Journal, on the other hand, joins an underground whispering chorus that NOLA should not be rebuilt, as it is below sea level, and also attacking liberals for allegedly exploiting the issue politically for a rescission of tax cuts and for more concern about global warming, then turns around and tries to use Katrina as an argument for MORE tax cuts -- as an economic stimulus policy.
It would seem to me that many of the neighborhoods in NOLA are relatively newer ones without many of the really old and beautiful houses standing albeit in need of repair, that are situated below sea level and now flooded. These areas could be built up with landfill, and NOLA restored in all its cultural and political glory that makes people like me love it but is precisely why so many would like it to disappear.
Here's the quotes from the WSJ:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007213
"But clearly there is an issue of how much federal money to pour into a city that is below sea-level and would still be vulnerable to another Category Four or Five storm."
"Republicans have been far too defensive on tax cuts, and Katrina is an opening to explain their necessity and to push for making them permanent."
Parenti's article:
How the Free Market Killed New Orleans*
By Michael Parenti
The free market played a crucial role in the destruction of New
Orleans and the death of thousands of its residents. Armed with
advanced warning
that a momentous (force 5) hurricane was going to hit that city and
surrounding areas, what did officials do? They played the free market.
They announced that everyone should evacuate. Everyone was expected to
devise their own way out of the disaster area by private means, just as
the free market dictates, just like people do when disaster hits
free-market Third World countries.
It is a beautiful thing this free market in which every individual
pursues his or her own personal interests and thereby effects an optimal
outcome for the entire society. This is the way the invisible hand works
its wonders.
There would be none of the collectivistic regimented evacuation as
occurred in Cuba. When an especially powerful hurricane hit that island
last year, the Castro government, abetted by neighborhood citizen
committees and local Communist party cadres, evacuated 1.3 million
people, more than 10 percent of the country's population, with not a
single life lost, a heartening feat that went largely unmentioned in the
U.S. press.
On Day One of the disaster caused by Hurricane Katrina, it was already
clear that hundreds, perhaps thousands, of American lives had been lost
in New Orleans. Many people had "refused" to evacuate, media reporters
explained, because they were just plain "stubborn."
It was not until Day Three that the relatively affluent telecasters
began to realize that tens of thousands of people had failed to flee
because they had nowhere to go and no means of getting there. With
hardly any cash at hand or no motor vehicle to call their own, they had
to sit tight and hope for the best. In the end, the free market did not
work so well for them.
Many of these people were low-income African Americans, along with fewer
numbers of poor whites. It should be remembered that most of them had
jobs before Katrina's lethal visit. That's what most poor people do in
this country: they work, usually quite hard at dismally paying jobs,
sometimes more than one job at a time. They are poor not because they're
lazy but because they have a hard time surviving on poverty wages while
burdened by high prices, high rents, and regressive taxes.
The free market played a role in other ways. Bush's agenda is to cut
government services to the bone and make people rely on the private
sector for the things they might need. So he sliced $71.2 million from
the budget of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers, a 44 percent
reduction. Plans to fortify New Orleans levees and upgrade the system of
pumping out water had to be shelved.
Bush took to the airways and said that no one could have foreseen this
disaster. Just another lie tumbling from his lips. All sorts of people
had been predicting disaster for New Orleans, pointing to the need to
strengthen the levees and the pumps, and fortify the coastlands.
In their campaign to starve out the public sector, the Bushite
reactionaries also allowed developers to drain vast areas of wetlands.
Again, that old invisible hand of the free market would take care of
things. The developers, pursuing their own private profit, would devise
outcomes that would benefit us all.
But wetlands served as a natural absorbent and barrier between New
Orleans and the storms riding in from across the sea. And for some years
now, the wetlands have been disappearing at a frightening pace on the
Gulf' coast. All this was of no concern to the reactionaries in the
White House.
As for the rescue operation, the free-marketeers like to say that relief
to the more unfortunate among us should be left to private charity. It
was a favorite preachment of President Ronald Reagan that "private
charity can do the job." And for the first few days that indeed seemed
to be the policy with the disaster caused by Hurricane Katrina.
The federal government was nowhere in sight but the Red Cross went into
action. Its message: "Don't send food or blankets; send money."
Meanwhile Pat Robertson and the Christian Broadcasting Network---taking
a moment off from God's work of pushing John Roberts nomination to the
Supreme Court---called for donations and announced "Operation Blessing"
which consisted of a highly-publicized but totally inadequate shipment
of canned goods and bibles.
By Day Three even the myopic media began to realize the immense failure
of the rescue operation. People were dying because relief had not
arrived. The authorities seemed more concerned with the looting than
with rescuing people. It was property before people, just like the free
marketeers always want.
But questions arose that the free market did not seem capable of
answering: Who was in charge of the rescue operation? Why so few
helicopters and just a scattering of Coast Guard rescuers? Why did it
take helicopters five hours to get six people out of one hospital? When
would the rescue operation gather some steam? Where were the feds? The
state troopers? The National Guard? Where were the buses and trucks? the
shelters and portable toilets? The medical supplies and water?
Where was Homeland Security? What has Homeland Security done with the
$33.8 billions allocated to it in fiscal 2005? Even ABC-TV evening news
(September 1, 2005) quoted local officials as saying that "the federal
government's response has been a national disgrace."
In a moment of delicious (and perhaps mischievous) irony, offers of
foreign aid were tendered by France, Germany and several other nations.
Russia offered to send two plane loads of food and other materials for
the victims. Predictably, all these proposals were quickly refused by
the White House. America the Beautiful and Powerful, America the Supreme
Rescuer and World Leader, America the Purveyor of Global Prosperity
could not accept foreign aid from others. That would be a most deflating
and insulting role reversal. Were the French looking for another punch
in the nose?
Besides, to have accepted foreign aid would have been to admit the
truth---that the Bushite reactionaries had neither the desire nor the
decency to provide for ordinary citizens, not even those in the most
extreme straits. Next thing you know, people would start thinking that
George W. Bush was really nothing more than a fulltime agent of
Corporate America.
-------
Michael Parenti's recent books include Superpatriotism (City Lights) and
The Assassination of Julius Caesar (New Press), both available in
paperback. His forthcoming The Culture Struggle (Seven Stories Press)
will be published in the fall. For more information visit:
www.michaelparenti.org
September 6, 2005 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm so sick of ego stroking inept politicians that care only for PR, I think I'll just run for office.
September 6, 2005 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
When I heard the new Bush blame game using "bureaucracy" in the perjorative manner this morning, I found it extremely troubling.. it's an inference that displays how inconvenient the Bush administration finds the representative system of government, and it's ability to curtail the worst of his attempts to over-reach.
We need to be especially vigilant at the moment, keeping an eye on things.
I salute you Representative Holt, keep fighting the good fight.
September 6, 2005 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Buildings, homes, businesses do not make cities...people do
Our citizens, our most valuable asset, have been forced to take shelter across the country, but Louisiana will not fully recover until those displaced by this storm can rejoin their communities."
- Governor Kathleen Babineaux Blanco
September 6, 2005 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rep. Holt,
As I argue in my blog here at TPMCafe, I believe one key reason behind the lack of Federal response to Katrina compared to 9/11 lies in the predisposition of the PNAC crowd. 9/11 was the catalyst they had hoped for. They had the script ready. However, they seem to have little desire to do the more mundane work of securing the entire energy pipeline and thus their reaction to Katrina was less enthusiastic, if you will.
September 6, 2005 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I found most striking about this post was one simple statement: "The essential role of government is to provide for its citizens in their time of need."
This seems so obvious, but I can’t recall ever hearing this stated as a principle of our government. (Maybe it’s the last five years of Bush and co....)
I’m amazed at the simplicity and the forcefulness of the concept — this is why we have governments! So many of the ideas for a Democratic platform, fifty-word mission statement, or ten-point contract with America — this is what it comes down to.
This is why I support Social Security, this is why I want a strong FEMA, this is why I support money for education. And it goes beyond domestic policy, too, as it recognizes the "need" of the collective citizenry (like "security" or "defense.")
This is why the federal response to Katrina has made me so angry and so frightened. The government failed its part of the bargain.
September 6, 2005 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Congressmen, it is with great regret that I write this post, but I feel it needs to be said.
You're pathetic politicians - all of you.
None of you deserve the seats you were elected to.
This issue will become politically polarizing soon - if not already - as every issue does, and again will pass another historic opportunity to strike a dagger into the heart of neo-conservatism, the Republican Party and George Bush. You see once an issue becomes polarized it becomes exponentially more difficult to even communicate with the other side. It doesn't take long before well-contrived Republican claptrap is accepted, if only because the other side is very good at what they do. They create nonsense that is congruous with the preconceived notions of the parties/politicians/ideologies of a significant number of center, right-of-center and sometimes even left-of-center Americans. Your opportunity to shape the opinions of a portion of that side, and overall public opinion is early on – in those brief moments when the narrative is written and that moment is quickly evaporating – if not already gone. This is what is most sickening to me.
Instead of just simply giving the American people the truth on why the good people of New Orleans were left to die - instead of just reiterating what they already know - you played your good little safe cowardly roles. Let none of you ever wonder why you're in the minority.
Bush was on vacation while a completely foreseeable catastrophe unfolded. FEMA wasn't in place before the storm because it lost that authority when it was folded into DHS, and the people the president nominated to run the agency, (and I’m betting the Senate Democrats voted to confirm) are completely unqualified.
Is that really too much for you guys?
The passivity on this issue, coupled with the Senate Dems’ roll over on the Roberts nomination has me more disappointed in the caucus than I've ever been - and I've endured some pretty disappointing moments since November 7, 2000.
It all has me seriously questioning how if you guys can't lead now, in our nation’s hour of great need, how can you be trusted to lead ever?September 7, 2005 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hello George Herbert Walker Bush
I'm writing here to criticize your son and the Republican party, which I have the right to do peacefully in this country.
Once again in a long line of disasters including 9-11 and the 2 space shuttle explosions, the Ford Explorer/Firestone tires rollover deaths, the prescription medication deaths, Enron, etc, New Orleans shows that the Republican party favors wealthy Republicans who don't like regulation of business and also want to give too much money in the form of tax cuts to wealthy Republicans causing budget problems that led to shortfunding programs for the improvement of levees in Louisiana to endure cat 4 and 5 hurricanes and favors companies or federal agencies too much and did not care about ordinary people and just left them to die of drowning, starvation, existing medical conditions without adequate medical help, rape, murder by criminals and for other reasons in flooded areas because your son's administration did not get federal troops down to New Orleans right away to rescue people. FEMA had the responsibility to get going right away but instead your son did not get FEMA going with troops. Yes, now's the point to criticize as well as do something to help the people in the South who have suffered. People can do both.
I have already sent money to an organization in New Orleans. I believe in Business and capitalism but not the cheap labor conservative laissez faire Ayn Rand type capitalism that you and your mad chimp of a son believe in.
How many people have died in the last 25 years since Ronald Reagan led his revolution which brought in a wave of radical Republicans who have wanted to deregulate companies and/or explore for oil which has lead to people either dying for oil in one way or another, or dying from unsafe products, or losing their life savings because your party looked the other way while your friend Ken Lay of Enron cheated millions of people or when the savings and loans stole from people in the 1980s. Why ? Why? Why?
One day when you and your son meet God I hope he plants both of you in purgatory forever, with you both never knowing where you will go.
More and more people appear fed up with the Republican Party and their deathbringing philosophy.
Noone died when Clinton lied, Mr. Bush.
And why did you abandon your crewmates in your plane that crashed in WWII? You could have landed your plane on the water and saved your crew. Military experts have mentioned that you could have landed on water and saved your crew in World War II. But no not you, you didn't consider them, you left them to die. The pattern has continued to this day where your son leaves people to die.
You don't like harsh criticism Mr. Bush? I will tell you what appears worse than harsh criticism, Mr. Bush: People who die as a result of your party philosophy and bad deeds.
DB
If you agree to make these demands of the following companies and will boycott them until the following conditions get met then place your name on the list after the last demand at the bottom of this email. Please also forward this email to as many people as you can so they can also sign the list of demands and then forward this email to webmaster@boycott-republicans.com with the subject name: AGENDA after you get the 50th signature on this email and I will forward this mail to the companies I have named below that we will boycott.
Walmart, Wendy’s, Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster Restaurants, Curves for Women health clubs, Dominos Pizza, CVS Pharmacies, Eckerd Pharmacies , Walgreens Pharmacies.
We demand that your company executives get the Republican Party to hold a press conference and accede to these demands. Until such a press conference happens and the legislation gets passed and signed into law, we will boycott your products.
We demand that the Republican party end their aggressive and hateful action to end a woman’s right to choose abortion or not.
We Demand that George W Bush WITHDRAW the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme court and nominate a moderate judge to the Supreme Court.
We demand that the Congress of the United states and the president of the United States enact a law to increase the minimum wage to TEN dollars an hour and also to extend unemployment benefits for all people whose unemployment benefits expired after 6 months even though they still seek work.
We demand that the Congress of the United States to not privatize social security benefits in any form including taking a percentage of the social security tax and placing it in private accounts. People can already create their own pensions with money after taxes in the private sector.
We demand that the congress make all of a person’s earned income taxable for social security FICA tax purposes and remove the 88,000 dollar salary cap. This will make social security solvent for many years to come.
We demand the congress increase the payroll tax in order to make social security solvent as well.
We demand congress and the president enact a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part B which covers 80 percent of medication cost, with no extra premium, no extra deductibles, no means test and no coverage gaps, and no penalties for signing up in a succeeding year.
We call for the complete repeal of the faulty Medicare law HR 1 / S 1 passed by congress in Nov 2003.
We demand vote by mail with paper ballots throughout the United States of America. This will prevent Republicans from suppressing voting by skin color which happened electronically and in person in the 2000 and 2004 elections.
We demand Civil servants on every state payroll should keep track of voter registrations and vote counting of mail in votes in each precinct and not companies such as Choicepoint. We need to take the Republican Party out of the business of keeping track of voter registration and counting votes.
We demand States ban the secretary of state from engaging in politics especially acting as a campaign official for a presidential campaign.
We do this in the spirit of peaceful resistance to a congress that refuses to enact this legislation.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
September 7, 2005 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr Hunt: Many people have talked about the crisis of poverty that the Katrina crisis laid bare. How do you feel about the UN report that just came out about the Third World in America-- an infant povery rate about 20 per cent, infant mortality the same as Malaysia's?
September 8, 2005 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink