Rbzswuatscnipmb5upus

Sahil Kapur

Sahil Kapur is TPM's senior congressional reporter and Supreme Court correspondent. His articles have been published in the Huffington Post, The Guardian and The New Republic. Email him at sahil@talkingpointsmemo.com and follow him on Twitter at @sahilkapur.

Articles by Sahil

The White House on Sunday night released state-by-state reports fleshing out the expected damage from the sequester -- the deep, indiscriminate spending cuts set to take effect this week. Party leaders have made no progress in striking a deal to avert them.

The reports details the consequences for popular areas of government like public health, education and research. It's part of a broader public relations offensive to pressure Republicans to drop their opposition to raising revenue as part of a deal to avoid what leaders of both parties agree would be devastating consequences if the cuts go through.

"Unfortunately, many Republicans in Congress refuse to ask the wealthy to pay a little more by closing tax loopholes so that we can protect investments that are helping grow our economy and keep our country safe," the reports say. "By not asking the wealthy to pay a little more, Republicans are forcing our children, seniors, troops, military families and the entire middle class to bear the burden of deficit reduction."

Read More →

At an annual Washington, D.C. meeting of the National Governors Association, Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie (D) warned that if sequestration goes into effect as it's set to next week, Pearl Harbor would be less secure.

"The plain fact is that will undermine our capacity for readiness at Pearl Harbor," he said, according to Yahoo News. "Now if that doesn't symbolize for the nation that far from overstating it, it is zeroing in on a graphic example of what happens when we fail to meet our responsibilities congressionally, I don't know what does."

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology was placed on lockdown Saturday morning after a gunman was reported on campus. But police soon said the threat was "unfounded."

The following emergency announcement was originally posted to MIT's website:

This morning information was received from Cambridge Police that there was a person with a long rifle and body armor in the Main Group Building of MIT.  Multiple law enforcement agencies have responded. Stay indoors and shelter in place and report suspicious activity to the campus police dispatch at 617 253 1212 or dial 100 from a campus phone. More updates to follow.

UPDATE: Not long after, Cambridge Police said there was no threat to public safety.

Indiana Republicans are advancing legislation that would require women to undergo a transvaginal ultrasound prior to an abortion, the latest in a string of efforts by state GOP lawmakers to actively discourage women from terminating their pregnancies.

The provision is tucked inside Senate Bill 371, introduced by State Sen. Travis Holdman (R), which has passed a committee. Although the legislation doesn't specifically say transvaginal ultrasound, its criteria would effectively require it, according to the abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America.

Read More →

Top Senate Democrats excoriated the competing House Republican version of the Violence Against Women Act hours after it was unveiled Friday.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the author of VAWA, derided the legislation as "partisan" and said it omits critical measures designed to protect vulnerable populations like Native Americans, immigrants and the gay and lesbian community.

"Next week, the House of Representatives plans to revert back to its partisan version of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act," Leahy said in a statement. "The Republican House leadership has decided to replace the Senate-passed version with a substitute that will not provide critical protections for rape victims, domestic violence victims, human trafficking victims, students on campuses, or stalking victims. This is simply unacceptable and it further demonstrates that Republicans in the House have not heard the message sent by the American people and reflected in the Senate's overwhelming vote earlier this month to pass the bipartisan Leahy-Crapo bill. A majority of Republican Senators -- and every woman serving in the United States Senate -- supported it."

Compared to last year's version, the new GOP bill reflects some movement in the Senate's direction but initial reactions from Democrats suggest that whatever nod House Republicans were trying to make toward compromise are not being well-received.

Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), a leadership member and prominent VAWA advocate, declared that "House Republican leadership just doesn't get it" and that the added protections for women "are not bargaining chips ... to appease the far right in their party."

"This partisan bill is a non-starter in the Senate," Murray said. "It's time for moderate Republicans in the House to step up and finally force their leadership to stop ignoring the calls of women across the country. ... Until then, the leadership in the House will continue to be the only thing standing between 30 million women and the VAWA protections they deserve."

Democrats are in a strong negotiating position because their version passed the Senate on an overwhelming 78-22 vote. On top of that, women voters trust them more, and are likelier to punish House Republicans if VAWA fails to get reauthorized.

"I am confident that those of us who fought for an inclusive reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act earlier this month that responds to the true needs of victims will continue the fight to protect victims of rape, domestic violence, human trafficking, and stalking," Leahy said. "The decision by the Republican leadership of the House to take up a partisan substitute to the bipartisan, Senate-passed bill is an unfortunate step in the wrong direction and undermines our long-fought efforts to help these victims."

House Republicans released their version of the Violence Against Women Act on Friday and are poised to fast-track it to a floor vote next Tuesday during a Rules Committee hearing.

The House GOP's legislation doesn't go as far as the reauthorization that passed the Senate on an overwhelming bipartisan vote earlier this month. It reflects some movement in that direction but falls short of a breakthrough on the central disputes that scuttled reauthorization of VAWA last year, namely, coverage for gay, Native American and illegal immigrant women. Democrats quickly rejected the bill and advocates against domestic violence expressed concerns with it.

Read More →

After House Republicans introduced their legislation to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, one GOP congressman said he wants leadership to do what it takes to pass the domestic violence bill.

"I am prepared to vote for the Senate bill that's passed," Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA) told TPM in an interview Friday. "At the very least I'd like to move on the House bill. The whole hangup is over the LGBT, U Visas and the tribal matters. I don't want to let these provisions impede the underlying bill."

Dent, who recently participated in a letter with 16 other House Republicans calling on GOP leadership to take up a bipartisan VAWA, said the conference has not yet had an in-depth discussion on VAWA but he expects there to be one next week. House Republican leaders have no intention of bringing up the Senate bill for a vote, but intend to fast-track their version to the floor next week.

"Republicans are for passing the Violence Against Women Act, too," Dent said. "The issues are the peripheral matters, not the substance of the bill."

President Obama told "The Black Eagle" radio show on Thursday that even if the Voting Rights Act loses in the Supreme Court, people won't lose their right to vote.

"I know in the past some folks have worried that if the Supreme Court strikes down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, they're going to lose their right to vote," he said, according to The Hill. "That's not the case. ... People will still have the same rights not to be discriminated against when it comes to voting, you just won't have this mechanism, this tool, that allows you to kind of stay ahead of certain practices."

Read More →

LiveWire