Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall is editor and publisher of TalkingPointsMemo.com.

Articles by Josh

Watching the lead up to tomorrow's Speaker vote, the supreme irony is you can see in painful detail and intensity just how much the Republican House caucus needed John Boehner. What's happening right now doesn't even rise to the level of conflict or disorder. That gives it too much credit. Kevin McCarthy was already saddled with all the baggage of John Boehner - in terms of holding the reins of responsibility, establishment backing, need to prevent catastrophic damage to GOP, etc. But since he entered the race it's been clear he's not at all good at leading the caucus - definitely not in the public spokesman sense, and seemingly not in the backroom sense either. So he's got Boehner's liabilities and then an entirely new one.

Read More →

With the election for House Speaker scheduled for tomorrow, and the helpless and enfeebled Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) being helped or dragged along by establishment supporters, McCarthy today is reduced to demanding Democrats "stop playing politics" with Benghazi.

Meanwhile, Rep Trey Gowdy (R-SC), Chairman of the Benghazi committee is saying McCarthy's apology "doesn't fix it." He goes on to say that all things being equal he'd rather have Paul Ryan (R-WI) as Speaker "because he’s super, super smart." But it's too late for that now and Ryan's not running. So strong endorsement for McCarthy!

Read More →

As I've mentioned a few times, through most of my life I was an avid book collector. Perhaps a hoarder. Regardless, I had a ton of books. Maybe literally. Like many of you I don't just enjoy reading, I'm into books, the physical artifact of the book. But then maybe half a dozen years ago, I started reading books on a Kindle. Soon after I moved to the Kindle app on an iPad - the Kindle devices themselves I've never liked, though I haven't tried the new ones in years. And something clicked in my brain and I switched - to the point where I have almost a block on reading physical books. This isn't an ideological or aesthetic choice or decision. To the extent that it is, I'd be on the physical book side. But, as I said, something just clicked for me and I couldn't go back.

So in our Insight polls I decided to ask this question. How are you reading books these days. Results after the jump.

Read More →

As I wrote on Friday, the craze to refuse to name the names of mass shooters is a grand form of evasion. Unable to address the actual causes of mass gun violence we stumble around for some feel-good nonsense that allows us to pretend we're taking action. But you can see the same drive expanding in other directions as well: even to the level of blaming the victims themselves.

Read More →

I don't think I've ever written anything positive about WaPo editorial page editor Fred Hiatt (so maybe I should give this more thought?). That's mainly because of the page's relentlessly establishmentarian tone and our radically different ideas about foreign policy. But here's a column that is important and which you should read. Hiatt gets at a key issue: the biggest victory of the NRA over the last generation isn't so much making even the slightest and most modest gun control measures a political impossibility. The bigger win is the strategic victory of focusing the 'debate' on to such small-bore measures. Let me unpack what I mean by this.

Read More →

TPM is seeking an editor for TPMCafe, the opinion and outside contributor section of our site. The new editor will work out of our New York City office. Applicants should be familiar with TPM, its history and obsessions. You should also be a news junkie while also being knowledgable and curious about a broad range of topics. Applicants should have a minimum of five years professional editorial experience. They should be excited about the fast pace, fluidity and constant change that is part of working in a modern, digital newsroom.

The goal of TPMCafe is to publish a steady stream of deeper reads from outside contributors, pieces ranging from pure opinion pieces and essays from experts in particular fields to the occasional fully reported article. The content should pivot off the news of the day without being captive to it. The editor must also have the range to handle both the public policy seriousness we're known for with the over-the-top sometimes tabloidesque headlines and tone that is no less a part of who we are.

This position is as much an assigning and curation position as an editing one. You should be prepared to show you're ready and able to take ownership of this part of the site and meet editorial and traffic goals we have for it. We have a strong organizational emphasis on flexibility and teamwork.

The position offers competitive compensation, health insurance coverage with no employee contribution, 401(k), and three weeks paid vacation per year.

To apply, send a resume and cover letter to jobs@talkingpointsmemo.com. Include the subject line: “Job App: TPMCafe Editor.”

Women and minorities are encouraged to apply.

I noted earlier that we need a real conversation about guns in this country. And a real conversation requires those who think we have too many guns in society and too much ease in buying them to think seriously about what our preferred policy is. Not just marginally, what we think might be possible and so forth - but what is preferred. I think many people believe that there should be dramatically fewer guns in United States, that it should be harder to purchase guns, that they should be licensed and regulated as you would regulate other extremely dangerous objects. Just speaking for myself, I think you could do all of this and still not interfere with people's ability to hunt. But that's just me.

But there's a premise this argument relies on that I didn't make explicit in my original post.

As long as it seemed possible to pass regulations limiting the most egregious abuses of gun ownership, there was some political logic to accepting the gun culture basically on its own terms and advocating for specific fixes. These include limitations on weapons designed for or less exclusively mass violence, basic background checks on gun purchases, perhaps waiting periods for purchasing a firearm, etc.

Read More →

Ben Carson has a great idea: Oregon massacre victims should have gotten their shit together and banded together to attack the shooter.