Dylan Scott

Dylan Scott is a reporter for Talking Points Memo. He previously reported for Governing magazine in Washington, D.C., and the Las Vegas Sun. His work has been recognized with a 2013 American Society of Business Publication Editors award for Best Feature Series and a 2010 Associated Press Society of Ohio award for Best Investigative Reporting. He can be reached at dylan@talkingpointsmemo.com.

Articles by Dylan

The Obama administration will postpone the start of Obamacare enrollment for 2015 coverage from Oct. 15, 2014, to Nov. 15, 2014, a Department of Health and Human Services official confirmed to TPM.

The move was first reported by Bloomberg, which portrayed the postponement as giving insurers more time to set their rates for next year. The official told TPM that the 2015 rate filing deadline for insurers, which is currently the end of April 2014, would be moved to the end of May.

Read More →

Just a couple months ago, House Republicans passed historic cuts to food stamps, nearly $40 billion worth. But now, a short time after that ideological stand, the GOP may have to relent in its effort to extract such significant reductions in the program's funding and agree to far less austere cuts, even if it means having to rely on Democratic votes to get it passed.

The possible about-face comes as the two chambers are negotiating over a farm bill that would include funding for the food stamp program. The Senate already passed a farm bill with modest cuts to food stamps. Conference committee negotiations to reconcile the two competing bills have been ongoing since last month.

Read More →

In an unprecedented policy change under Obamacare, California's health insurance marketplace has extended its initial Obamacare enrollment deadline. The move by California, which has the largest individual insurance market in the country, could potentially influence other states and increase pressure on the Obama administration to extend the deadline on the federal marketplace.

The deadline for enrolling in coverage that starts Jan. 1, 2014, will be moved from Dec. 15 to Dec. 23, Covered California, the California marketplace, announced Thursday. The deadline for premium payments will be moved from Dec. 26 to Jan. 5.

Dec. 15 remains the deadline for enrollment on HealthCare.gov, the federal website that serves 36 states. The administration has given no indication that it will extend that deadline for the federal marketplace.

Read More →

In a major blow to President Obama's plan, California's health insurance marketplace has decided not to implement the White House's "fix" for people whose health plans have been cancelled.

As the biggest state with what's likely the biggest number of insurance cancellations -- 900,000, according to ProPublica -- the decision will hinder Obama's aim of giving those people the option of keeping their current health plan.

Read More →

In order to prevent consumers from being misled or deceived about Obamacare, the Obama administration is setting new rules about the notices that insurance companies should give customers in the individual health insurance market.

The new rules, announced Thursday, address two related issues: notice that must be given to consumers being offered the option of renewing their existing policies and notice that should be given to consumers whose existing policies are being cancelled.

When insurers are offering customers the opportunity to renew an existing insurance plan, part of the new Obamacare "fix," they must inform them that they can shop on the law's new marketplaces and they may qualify for tax credits or other financial assistance.

The required renewal letters will also be required to inform recipients about the differences between their current non-compliant coverage and what they would be able to purchase under Obamacare.

The White House's 'fix' gives state regulators and insurers the option of allowing renewal for non-Obamacare-compliant plans. For those companies that offer renewal under the fix, the notice is required.

Read More →

One insurance company that isn't selling its plans on HealthCare.gov is launching a series of ads that mock the federal website's glitchy launch and urge consumers to seek out its policies instead.

According to AdAge, Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield will air three different television ads in Iowa and South Dakota, two of the 36 states where residents are using HealthCare.gov, starting Thursday through mid-December.

Read More →

When Republicans regain control of the Senate, they're likely going to expand the rules change that Democrats approved Thursday to apply to U.S. Supreme Court nominees, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said on the Senate floor.

The changes passed by Democrats affects votes on judicial and executive nominees -- requiring only 51 votes to end a filibuster -- but excludes nominees to the Supreme Court.

"The silver lining is that there will come a day when roles are reversed. When that happens, our side will likely nominate and confirm lower court and Supreme Court nominees with 51 votes," Grassley said, "regardless of whether the Democrats actually buy into this fanciful notion that they can demolish the filibuster on lower court nominees and still preserve it for Supreme Court."

Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR), one of three Democratic senators to vote against changing the Senate's filibuster rules, said that the change "could permanently damage the Senate."

"Today’s use of the ‘nuclear option’ could permanently damage the Senate and have negative ramifications for the American people," he said in a statement. "During my time in the Senate, I’ve played key roles in the Gang of 14 and other bipartisan coalitions to help us reach common-sense solutions that both sides of the aisle can support. This institution was designed to protect -- not stamp out -- the voices of the minority."

The other two Democrats who side with Republicans on the filibuster change were Carl Levin (D-MI) and Joe Manchin (D-WV).

It's a ruse, Senate Republicans said before and then after their Democratic colleagues voted Thursday to alter the filibuster rules for judicial and executive nominees. By their telling, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) needed to find something to change the subject after Obamacare's troubled rollout, which had dominated headlines in recent weeks. He found it in changing the Senate rules.

This wasn't about ending GOP obstruction of the president's nominees, they said. This was about distracting from the president's failed health care law.

“I’d be looking to change the subject just as Senate Democrats have been doing with their threats of going nuclear and changing the Senate rules on nominations," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said on the floor before the vote. “Millions of Americans are hurting because of a law Washington Democrats forced upon them, and what do they do about it? They cook up some fake fight over judges that aren’t even needed."

Read More →

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said that Democrats would "pay a heavy, heavy price" for changing the Senate rules for judicial and executive nominees.

"They're governed by the newer members... who have never been in a minority, who are primarily driving this issue," McCain told reporters after the vote. "They succeeded and they will pay a very, very heavy price for it."

McCain said moments later, though, that he did not believe it would be a major election issue. "I don't think Americans understand it very well," he said.