Dylan Scott

Dylan Scott is a reporter for Talking Points Memo. He previously reported for Governing magazine in Washington, D.C., and the Las Vegas Sun. His work has been recognized with a 2013 American Society of Business Publication Editors award for Best Feature Series and a 2010 Associated Press Society of Ohio award for Best Investigative Reporting. He can be reached at

Articles by Dylan

The Obama administration is giving people enrolled in a special insurance plan for those with pre-existing conditions an extra month to sign up for new coverage under Obamacare.

People enrolled in the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan -- created as a bridge to 2014, when insurers can no longer discriminate against who have pre-existing conditions -- can remain enrolled in the plan through January, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced Thursday. It had been set to expire at the end of the year.

The plan provides insurance to those high-risk enrollees who were often refused coverage by private insurers prior to the health care reform law because of their medical conditions. It was created when the law was passed in 2010 as a means of providing some people with insurance until the law took full effect next year.

The administration said it made the move so that those enrolled through the program would not experience a lapse in coverage starting Jan. 1. It gives them more time to consider their options -- and ensures that they won't be left without coverage because of problems with

Singer Adam Levine -- People's 2013 Sexiest Man Alive -- is among the celebrities being tapped to promote Obamacare as the law's first enrollment deadline approaches, Bloomberg reports.

The social media campaign -- which will also include actress Fran Drescher (known for "The Nanny" TV series) and actor Kal Penn (Kumar of "Harold and Kumar") -- will launch on Thursday. It will include online videos and outreach on social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook.

Read More →

The ongoing problems with Oregon's state-based Obamacare website mean roughly 30,000 people who have applied for health coverage might not see it start on Jan. 1, 2014, as expected.

The Statesman Journal reported that about half of the 65,000 paper applications that the state has received -- the move to paper was necessitated by the broken website -- appear to be incomplete or have errors that prevent officials from processing them.

Read More →

Obamacare enrollment picked up in November, more than doubling the low numbers seen in October after's troubled rollout, but the pace still lags behind the targets set by the Obama administration.

More than 250,000 people enrolled in private plans last month through and the state-based marketplaces, according to a report released Wednesday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Add in the 100,000-plus who enrolled in October, and the two-month total comes to nearly 365,000.

But that figure falls short of the administration's pre-launch goals. The White House had been aiming for 500,000 private enrollments in October alone. By the end of 2013, the target was 3.3 million, leaving the administration with a lot of ground to make up this month.

Administration officials still expressed confidence that they could reach their ultimate goal: 7 million enrollees by March 31, 2014.

"We think we're on track, and we'll reach the total that we thought," Michael Hash, whose office is overseeing Obamacare implementation at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, told reporters Tuesday. "We're only two and a half months into a six-month open enrollment period. Based upon experience such as that in Massachusetts, we expect that a bulk of enrollees will occur toward the end of the enrollment period."

Read More →

Going into 2014, the United States is split down the middle: 25 states (plus Washington, D.C.) have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, and 25 states have not.

Those 25 non-expanding states have left five million people below the poverty line uncovered under the health care reform law, but the White House isn't giving up the fight. Administration officials is actively stumping for expansion, holding conference calls with local officials and reporters and attending advocacy events in 11 of the non-expanding states since the beginning of November.

They think they've got quite a pitch. The federal government would cover 100 percent of the costs through 2016 and never less than 90 percent after that. That deal has already won over some GOP governors, and Obamacare supporters hope it will convince more. That's the leverage the administration and others plan to wield against skeptical state officials.

"I'm not sure there's a very good case for state legislators or governors to explain to people why they oppose Medicaid expansion," White House Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest said in response to a question from TPM during a Monday conference call. "It's unfortunate when the stakes are this high, when we're talking about giving people access to quality, affordable health insurance that there are still some politicians who would allow politics to get in the way. That is a tough case to make publicly."

Community organizations and lobbying groups for the medical industry have pledged to push state legislatures when they reconvene in the next year. For their biggest prize -- Texas -- they'll have to wait until lawmakers come back in 2015.

But the battle for many of the other states will begin in the new year. Here's a look at five states among the most likely to reverse course and expand Medicaid in the near future.

Read More →

The Obama administration has approved Iowa's alternative plan for expanding Medicaid under Obamacare -- but with one important tweak, which state officials will have to sign off on.

The approval was first reported by the Washington Post. A spokesman for Gov. Terry Branstad (R), who proposed the alternative plan, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read More →

Several Obamacare advocates told the Los Angeles Times that they've effectively given up relying on the White House for support in reaching out to people about the law and enrolling them in health coverage.

Their vocal frustrations speak to the rift that has grown between the administration and the advocacy community since the botched rollout of

"The refrain we most often hear is: 'Where is the administration?'" M. Ryan Barker, vice president of the Missouri Foundation for Health, which has been working to support implementation in that state, told the newspaper. "It is very frustrating."

Read More →

The emerging deal on food stamp spending, part of the House and Senate's ongoing negotiations over the farm bill, would include dollar savings, but would not kick anybody off the program -- a far cry from the bill passed by the House GOP this fall.

The framework of the deal is a dramatic comedown for Republicans, especially in the House, which already passed $40 billion in cuts to the food stamp program in September. The total cuts in the new deal would likely come in less than $10 billion -- Roll Call reported $8 billion as a possible figure Monday. It's a slight come-up for Senate Democrats, who passed a bill with $4 billion in cuts in the summer. The bulk of the spending cuts would come from an administrative fix, according to sources familiar with the talks.

But importantly for Democrats, no one would be removed from the program's rolls in the deal being finalized in the talks, being led by Senate Agriculture Chair Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) and House Agriculture Chair Frank Lucas (R-OK). The House-passed bill would have resulted in 3.6 million people losing food stamp benefits, according to outside estimates.

Specifics are still being ironed out, and the hope is that the committee will meet this week. Assuming that happens, the Senate could pass the bill before the end of the year and the House will follow suit when it returns in January.

Read More →

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) announced Monday that he would not use his federally-funded employer subsidy to pay for health insurance under Obamacare.

Members of Congress are required to purchase insurance through the law's insurance marketplaces, but the federal government had ruled that they could still use their government-funded employer contribution to pay for it. Graham said Monday he would decline the contribution, which his office said would have covered about 75 percent of the costs.

“I don’t think Members of Congress should get a special deal,” Graham said in a statement. “Obamacare is being pushed on the American people and we should live under it just like everyone else.”