Ill. Supreme Court Will Hear $10B Phillip Morris Class Action Appeal

CORRECTS DATE OF REINSTATEMENT TO APRIL 29 INSTEAD OF APRIL 2 - FILE - In this Feb. 7, 2011 file photo a person smokes a Marlboro cigarette, a Phillip Morris product, in Hialeah, Fla. An Illinois appellate court on ... CORRECTS DATE OF REINSTATEMENT TO APRIL 29 INSTEAD OF APRIL 2 - FILE - In this Feb. 7, 2011 file photo a person smokes a Marlboro cigarette, a Phillip Morris product, in Hialeah, Fla. An Illinois appellate court on Tuesday, April 29, 2014 reinstated a decade-old $10.1 billion verdict in a class-action lawsuit against Phillip Morris USA that found the nation's biggest cigarette maker misled customers about "light" and "low tar" designations. Philip Morris swiftly decried Tuesday's ruling by a three-judge panel of the Mount Vernon-based 5th District Appellate Court, saying it would ask the Illinois Supreme Court to review the matter. (AP Photo/Alan Diaz, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) — The Illinois Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on a $10.1 billion class action verdict against cigarette giant Phillip Morris USA.

The court will hear the case Tuesday.

Last year, an appellate court reinstated a 2003 local verdict that Phillip Morris broke state law by marketing “light” and “low-tar” cigarettes as safer than others.

The Illinois high court initially ruled with the company, because federal rules allowed such marketing. A 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decree allowed for reconsideration of the Illinois case.

The plaintiffs asked Justice Lloyd Karmeier to recuse himself because they say he’s biased in favor of Phillip Morris. Karmeier refused and says he has no conflict.

___

The case is Price v. Philip Morris

Online: http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: