Justices Let Stand $70M In Awards To Smokers

Tobacco firm's plea on plain packs. File photo dated 18/06/07 of cigarettes. Tobacco giant Philip Morris has urged ministers not to announce moves to force it to sell cigarettes in plain packages in the Queen's Speec... Tobacco firm's plea on plain packs. File photo dated 18/06/07 of cigarettes. Tobacco giant Philip Morris has urged ministers not to announce moves to force it to sell cigarettes in plain packages in the Queen's Speech after commissioning a poll which found most police officers believe it will lead to an increase in the illicit trade. Issue date: Tuesday June 3, 2014. Public health minister Jane Ellison said last month that the Government was "minded" to introduce the measure, raising expectations that it will be included in the next year's legislative programme. See PA story POLITICS Tobacco. Photo credit should read: Martin Rickett/PA Wire URN:19997928 MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has turned away appeals from cigarette manufacturers of more than $70 million in court judgments to Florida smokers.

The justices did not comment Monday in rejecting the companies’ complaints.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA Inc. and Lorillard Tobacco Co. wanted the court to review cases in which smokers won large damage awards without having to prove that the companies sold a defective and dangerous product or hid the risks of smoking.

Those cases all relied on a Florida court ruling that allows individual smokers or their surviving relatives to use jury findings in an earlier large class-action lawsuit, even though the verdict in that earlier case was overturned. Each plaintiff still has to show addiction to cigarettes, and resulting death or illness.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: