TPM News

Obama: Government And Business Each Have Obligations In this weekend's YouTube address, President Obama trumpeted his administration's support of incentives for research into clean energy and energy-efficiency, which he highlighted during his visit this past week to Penn State University. And he also said that government and business each have responsibilities.

"Our government has an obligation to make sure that America is the best place on Earth to do business - that we have the best schools, the best incentives to innovate, and the best infrastructure...But businesses have a responsibility, too. If we make America the best place to do business, businesses should make their mark in America. They should set up shop here, and hire our workers, and pay decent wages, and invest in the future of this nation. That's their obligation.

"And that's the message I'll be bringing to American business leaders at the Chamber of Commerce on Monday - that government and businesses have mutual responsibilities; and that if we fulfill these obligations together, it benefits us all. Our workers will succeed. Our nation will prosper. And America will win the future in this century just like we did in the last."

Read More →

Sarah Palin's apparent attempt to trademark her name has just run into a legal obstacle -- specifically, she didn't sign the papers.

Reuters reports:

Applications to trademark the names Sarah Palin and Bristol Palin, both for "motivational speaking services," were filed on November 5 by the Palins' longtime family attorney, Thomas Van Flein, but were quickly slapped down by a trademark examiner.

"Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, SARAH PALIN, consists of a name identifying a particular living individual whose consent to register the mark is not of record," the patent agency said in an office action.

"Please note this refusal will be withdrawn if applicant provides written consent from the individual identified in the applied-for mark," the patent office said.


You mean her ghost-writer couldn't have signed it for her?

1||NASA has recently been talking to Las Vegas based Bigelow Aerospace about producing a new module for the International Space Station based on a simple, space-saving concept: the balloon. The photo above shows a configuration of three Bigelow modules that can house up to a crew of six.||Bigelow Aerospace&& 2||Bigelow modules could be used as part of mission to Mars. The modules are deflated and stored during launch saving valuable cargo space. Once in orbit, the modules expand.||Bigelow Aerospace&& 3||A cross-section of an inflatable space module.||flickr/jedibfa&& 4||By 2017, Bigelow Aerospace hopes to have Space Station Bravo operational.||Bigelow Aerospace&& 5||Nasa has been experimenting with inflatable space satellites since its founding. Echo I, pictured above, was launched in 1960. It passively reflected telephone, radio, and television signals.||NASA&& 6||Echo II, a larger version of Echo I, was launched January 25, 1964. It had a diameter of 135 feet.||NASA&& 7||PAGEOS (Passive Geodetic Earth Orbiting Satellite) was launched in 1966. It helped provide more accurate geolocation of Earth objects. It had a volume of 524,000 cubic feet and was coated with vapour deposited aluminium.||NASA&& 8||In 1997, scientists at Johnson Space Center in Houston came up with the idea of using an inflatable craft for use as a living module for the new ISS or for future missions to Mars. The scientists called the concept "TransHab."||NASA&& 9||A diagram of Transhab's levels from a 2000 Nasa document.||NASA&& 10||Two photos of a Transhab prototype. On the left is Transhab deflated a folded. On the right, expanded as it would be in space. From a 2000 Nasa document.||NASA&& 11||The International Space Station in front of the Caspian Sea.||NASA&&

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), the Tea Party star and possible presidential candidate who bypassed the GOP leadership and offered her own budget plan, has now dropped a very controversial part of her plan to deal with the deficits: Cuts to veterans' benefits.

In a statement posted on her Web site, Bachmann writes:

"One point on my discussion list was a $4.5 billion proposal that would affect payments made to our veterans. That discussion point has received a lot of attention and I have decided to remove it from consideration. The problem of government spending must be solved, but not on the backs of our nation's war heroes. I have always been a proud supporter of the United States military and I continue to stand with our veterans. In the months ahead I look forward to working with our Veterans Service Organizations to ensure that we fulfill our commitments to those who sacrificed so much in their brave service for our country."

Read More →

A fun nugget buried in this story about Rep. Ann Buerkle's (R-NY) first town hall meeting as an elected member of Congress. Constituents repeatedly asked a puzzled Buerkle about her health benefits. She couldn't figure out why. But her staff sure could.

Buerkle, who voted to repeal the health care reform act, was twice asked about the health insurance she receives as a government employee. At first she said she couldn't understand why people were so interested in her health insurance, and that taxpayers didn't pay anything for it. She later corrected herself after being handed a note from a staffer. Like most employees, she pays for a portion of her insurance and her employer, the government, pays the rest, she said.

Read More →

The controversy over "forcible rape" may be over, but now there's a new Republican-sponsored abortion bill in the House that pro-choice folks say may be worse: this time around, the new language would allow hospitals to let a pregnant woman die rather than perform the abortion that would save her life.

The bill, known currently as H.R. 358 or the "Protect Life Act," would amend the 2010 health care reform law that would modify the way Obamacare deals with abortion coverage. Much of its language is modeled on the so-called Stupak Amendment, an anti-abortion provision pro-life Democrats attempted to insert into the reform law during the health care debate last year. But critics say a new language inserted into the bill just this week would go far beyond Stupak, allowing hospitals that receive federal funds but are opposed to abortions to turn away women in need of emergency pregnancy termination to save their lives.

The sponsor of H.R. 358, Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA) is a vocal member of the House's anti-abortion wing. A member of the bipartisan Pro-Life Caucus and a co-sponsor of H.R 3 -- the bill that added "forcible rape" to the lexicon this week -- Pitts is no stranger to the abortion debate. But pro-choice advocates say his new law goes farther than any other bill has in encroaching on the rights of women to obtain an abortion when their health is at stake. They say the bill is giant leap away from accepted law, and one they haven't heard many in the pro-life community openly discuss before.

Read More →

Another battle over attempts by Republican state legislators to nullify the federal health care reform law is bubbling up in deep-red Idaho, where legislation was introduced last week.

As the Spokane Spokesman-Review (located just on the other side of the Washington state border) reports, legislators in a key Idaho state House committee voted to advance the bill on a party-line vote, 15 Republicans for four Democrats. However, some GOP legislators said at the same time that they had reservations about the bill, and were voting for the bill in committee in order to allow for further debate.

The bill's main sponsor, state Rep. Vito Barbieri (R) said: "The question becomes, is the Legislature going to become a rubber stamp of everything that the government decides to do, or is the Legislature going to be able to interpose between onerous laws that the federal government decides to implement and its citizens? That's the question before us."

However, this move is also being strongly opposed by the few Democrats in Idaho's state legislature -- and the office of the state attorney general, a Republican.

Read More →

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), who yesterday told the Radio-Television Correspondents Association he's willing to increase media access in the House, has denied C-SPAN's request to allow its cameras to cover House floor debates.

"I believe the American people -- and the dignity and decorum of the United States House of Representatives -- are best served by the current system of televised proceedings provided by the House Recording Studio," Boehner wrote to C-SPAN Chairman Brian Lamb.

Read More →

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg thinks the New Yorker magazine cover, showing him staring adoringly at his own reflection, is "great."

"I thought it was cute looking into the mirror," Bloomberg said.

The magazine cover -- titled "Bloom in Love" -- shows Bloomberg blushing into a mirror, red hearts floating above his head and a Valentine's day box of chocolates labeled "To: Me."

Read More →

LiveWire