TPM News

The New Jersey Sierra Club just threw a curveball into the gubernatorial -- one that could potentially damage Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine -- with the environmental group endorsing the independent candidate Chris Daggett instead of either Corzine or Republican former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie.

Daggett previously served in the 1980s as environmental protection commission in the administration of Republican Gov. Tom Kean Sr. "The Club endorsed Chris Daggett because he is a person of the highest integrity and has an outstanding environmental record of real achievement," said the state Sierra Club political chairman Rich Isaac, in the group's statement. "Chris Daggett is not beholden to special interests or making backroom deals and has consistently proven that he is committed to protecting the environment."

Corzine has never gotten along well with the state Sierra Club, whose state director Jeff Tittel has called Corzine "the worst environmental administration in state history."

Daggett has scored in the single digits in recent polls. The question is whether he can keep that up, or whether his support will collapse as third-party candidates often do. With state environmental activists backing him, it would seem more likely that he would take votes away from the Democrats as opposed to the Republicans.

President Obama addressed the VFW National Convention in Phoenix, Ariz., today. Here are his prepared remarks, released by the White House:



Thank you, Commander Gardner, for your introduction and for your lifetime of service. I was proud to welcome Glen and your executive director, Bob Wallace, to the Oval Office just before the Fourth of July, and I look forwarding to working with your next commander--Tommy Tradewell.



Let me also salute Jean Gardner and Sharon Tradewell, as well as Dixie Hild, Jan Title and all the spouses and family of the Ladies Auxiliary. America honors your service as well.



Members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, I am honored and humbled to stand before you as Commander-in-Chief of the finest military the world has ever known. And we're joined by some of those who make it the finest force in world--from Luke Air Force Base, members of the 56th Fighter Wing.



Whether you wear the uniform today, or wore it decades ago, you remind us of a fundamental truth. It's not the powerful weapons that make our military the strongest in the world. It's not the sophisticated systems that make us the most advanced. No, the true strength of our military lies in the spirit and skill of our men and women in uniform.



You know this. It is the story of your lives. When fascism seemed unstoppable and our harbor was bombed, you battled across rocky Pacific islands and stormed the beaches of Europe, marching across a continent--my own grandfather and uncle among your ranks--liberating millions and turning enemies into allies.



When communism cast its shadow across so much of the globe, you stood vigilant in a long Cold War--from an airlift in Berlin to the mountains of Korea to the jungles of Vietnam. When that Cold War ended and old hatreds emerged anew, you turned back aggression from Kuwait to Kosovo.



And long after you took off the uniform, you've continued to serve: supporting our troops and their families when they go to war and welcoming them when they come home; working to give our veterans the care they deserve; and when America's heroes are laid to rest, giving every one that final fitting tribute of a grateful nation. We can never say it enough: for your service in war and in peace, thank you VFW.



Today, the story of your service is carried on by a new generation--dedicated, courageous men and women who I have the privilege to lead and meet every day.



They're the young sailors--the midshipmen at the Naval Academy who raised their right hand at graduation and committed themselves to a life of service.



They're the soldiers I met in Baghdad who have done their duty, year after year, on a second, third or fourth tour.



They're the Marines of Camp Lejeune, preparing to deploy and now serving in Afghanistan to protect Americans here at home.



They're the airmen, like those here today, who provide the close air support that saves the lives of our troops on the ground.



They're the wounded warriors--at Landstuhl and Walter Reed and Bethesda and across America--for whom the battle is not to fight, but simply to speak, to stand, to walk once more.



They're the families that my wife Michelle has met at bases across the country. The spouses back home doing the parenting of two. The children who wonder when mom or dad is coming home. The parents who watch their sons and daughters go off to war. The families who lay a loved one to rest--and the pain that lasts a lifetime.



To all those who have served America--our forces, your families, our veterans--you have done your duty. You have fulfilled your responsibilities. And now a grateful nation must fulfill ours. And that is what I want to talk about today.



First, we have a solemn responsibility to always lead our men and women in uniform wisely. This starts with a vision of American leadership that recognizes that military power alone cannot be the first or only answer to the threats facing our nation.



In recent years, our troops have succeeded in every mission America has given them, from toppling the Taliban to deposing a dictator in Iraq to battling brutal insurgencies. At the same time, forces trained for war have been called upon to perform a whole host of missions. Like mayors, they've run local governments and delivered water and electricity. Like aid workers, they've mentored farmers and built new schools. Like diplomats, they've negotiated agreements with tribal sheikhs and local leaders.



But let us never forget. We are a country of more than 300 million Americans. Less than one percent wears the uniform. And that one percent--our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen--have borne the overwhelming burden of our security. In fact, perhaps never in American history have so few protected so many.



The responsibility for our security must not be theirs alone. That is why I have made it a priority to enlist all elements of our national power in defense of our national security--our diplomacy and development, our economic might and our moral example. Because one of the best ways to lead our troops wisely is prevent the conflicts that cost American blood and treasure tomorrow.



As President, my greatest responsibility is the security and safety of the American people. As I've said before, this is the first thing that I think about when I wake up in the morning. It's the last thing that I think about when I go to sleep at night. And I will not hesitate to use force to protect the American people or our vital interests.



But as we protect America, our men and women in uniform must always be treated as what they are: America's most precious resource. As Commander-in-Chief I have a solemn responsibility for their safety. And there is nothing more sobering than signing a letter of condolence to the family of serviceman or woman who has given their life for our country.



That is why I have made this pledge to our armed forces: I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary. When I do, it will be based on good intelligence and guided by a sound strategy. And I will give you a clear mission, defined goals and the equipment and support you need to get the job done.



That is our second responsibility to our armed forces--giving them the resources and equipment and strategies to meet their missions. We need to keep our military the best trained, the best-led, the best-equipped fighting force in the world. That's why--even with our current economic challenges--my budget increases defense spending.



We will ensure that we have the force structure to meet today's missions. That is why we've increased the size of the Army and Marines Corps two years ahead of schedule and have approved another temporary increase in the Army. And we've halted personnel reductions in the Navy and Air Force. This will give our troops more time home between deployments, which means less stress on families and more training for the next mission. And it will help us put an end, once and for all, to stop-loss for those have done their duty.



We will equip our forces with the assets and technologies they need to fight and win. So my budget funds more of the Army helicopters, crews and pilots urgently needed in Afghanistan; the intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance that gives our troops the advantage; the special operations forces that can deploy on a moment's notice. And for all those serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, including our National Guard and Reserve, more of the protective gear and armored vehicles that saves lives.



As we fight in two wars, we will plan responsibly, budget honestly and speak candidly about the costs and consequences of our actions. That is why I've made sure my budget includes the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.



In Iraq, after more than six years of war, we took an important step forward in June. We transferred control of all cities and towns to Iraq's security services. The transition to full Iraqi responsibility for their own security is now underway. This progress is a testament to all those who have served in Iraq, uniformed and civilian. And our nation owes these Americans--and all who have given their lives--a profound debt of gratitude.



As they take control of their destiny, Iraqis will be tested and targeted. Those who seek to sow sectarian division will attempt more senseless bombings, more killing of innocents. This we know.



But as we move forward, the Iraqi people must know that the United States will keep its commitments. And the American people must know that we will move forward with our strategy. We will begin removing our combat brigades from Iraq later this year. We will remove all our combat brigades by the end of next August. And we will remove all our troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. And for America, the Iraq war will end.



By moving forward in Iraq, we're able to refocus on the war against al Qaeda and its extremist allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That is why I announced a new, comprehensive strategy in March. This strategy recognizes that al Qaeda and its allies had moved their base to the remote, tribal areas of Pakistan. This strategy acknowledges that military power alone will not win this war--that we also need diplomacy and development and good governance. And our new strategy has a clear mission and defined goals--to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies.



In the months since, we've begun to put this comprehensive strategy into action. And in recent weeks, we've seen our troops do their part. They've have gone into new areas--taking the fight to the Taliban in villages and towns where residents have been terrorized for years. They're adopting new tactics, knowing that it's not enough to kill extremists and terrorists; we also need to protect the Afghan people and improve their daily lives. And today, our troops are helping to secure polling places for this week's election so Afghans can choose the future they want.



These new efforts have not been without a price. The fighting has been fierce. More Americans have given their lives. And as always, the thoughts and prayers of every American are with those who make the ultimate sacrifice in our defense.



As I said when I announced this strategy, there will be more difficult days ahead. The insurgency in Afghanistan didn't just happen overnight. And we won't defeat it overnight. This will not be quick. This will not be easy.



But we must never forget. This is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans. So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is fundamental to the defense of our people.



Going forward, we will constantly adapt our tactics to stay ahead of the enemy and give our troops the tools and equipment they need to succeed. And at every step of the way, we will assess our efforts to defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies, and to help the Afghan and Pakistani people build the future they seek.



Even as we lead and equip our troops for the missions of today, we have a third responsibility to fulfill. We must prepare our forces for the missions of tomorrow.



Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen adapt to new challenges everyday. But as we all know, much of our defense establishment has yet to fully adapt to the post-Cold War world, with doctrine and weapons better suited to fight the Soviets on the plains of Europe than insurgents in the rugged terrain of Afghanistan. Twenty years after the Cold War ended, this is not simply unacceptable. It is irresponsible. And our troops and taxpayers deserve better.



That is why our defense review is taking a top-to-bottom look at our priorities and posture, questioning conventional wisdom, rethinking old dogmas and challenging the status quo. We're asking hard questions about the forces we need and the weapons we buy. And when we're finished, we'll have a new blueprint for the 21st century military we need. In fact, we're already on our way.



We're adopting new concepts--because the full spectrum of challenges demands a full range of military capabilities--the conventional and the unconventional, the ablilty to defeat both the armored division and the lone suicide bomber; the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile and the Improvised Explosive Device; 18th-century-style piracy and 21st century cyber threats. No matter the mission, we must maintain America's military dominance.



So even as we modernize our conventional forces, we're investing in the capabilities that will reorient our force of the future: an Army that is more mobile and expeditionary and missile defenses that protect our troops in the field; a Navy that not only projects power across the oceans but operates nimbly in shallow, coastal waters; an Air Force that dominates the airspace with next-generation aircraft--manned and unmanned; a Marine Corps that can move ashore more rapidly in more places. And across the force, we're investing in new skills and specialties. Because in the 21st century, military strength will be measured not only by the weapons our troops carry, but by the languages they speak and the cultures they understand.

But here's the simple truth. We can't build the 21st century military we need--and maintain the fiscal responsibility that Americans demand--unless we fundamentally reform the way our defense establishment does business. It's a simple fact. Every dollar wasted in our defense budget is a dollar we can't spend to care for our troops, protect America or prepare for the future.



You know the story. The indefensible no-bid contracts that cost taxpayers billions and make contractors rich. The special interests and their exotic projects that are years behind schedule and billions over budget. The entrenched lobbyists pushing weapons that even our military says it doesn't want. The impulse in Washington to protect jobs back home building things we don't need at a cost we can't afford.



This waste would be unacceptable at any time. But at a time when we're fighting two wars and facing a serious deficit, it's inexcusable. It's unconscionable. It's an affront to the American people and to our troops. And it's time for it to stop.



This isn't a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. It's about giving our troops the support they need. And that's something on which all Americans can agree. So I'm glad that I have a partner in this effort in a great veteran, a great Arizonan, and a great American who has shown the courage to stand and fight this waste--Senator John McCain. And I'm proud to have Secretary of Defense Robert Gates--who has served under eight presidents of both parties--leading this fight at the Pentagon.



Already, I've put an end to unnecessary no-bid contracts. I signed bipartisan legislation to reform defense procurement so weapons systems don't spin out of control. And even as we increase spending on the equipment and weapons our troops do need, we have proposed cutting tens of billions of dollars in waste we don't need.



Think about it. Hundreds of millions of dollars for an alternate second engine for the Joint Strike Fighter--when one reliable engine will do just fine. Nearly two billion dollars to buy more F-22 fighter jets when we can move ahead with a fleet of newer, more affordable aircraft. Tens of billions of dollars to put an anti-missile laser on a fleet of vulnerable 747s.



And billions of dollars for a new presidential helicopter. Maybe you heard about this. Among other capabilities, it would let me cook a meal while under nuclear attack. I'll tell you something. If the United States of America is under nuclear attack, the last thing on my mind will be whipping up a snack.



It's simple enough. Cut the waste. Save taxpayer dollars. Support the troops. But we all know how Washington works. The special interests, contractors and entrenched lobbyists are invested in the status quo. And they're putting up a fight.



But make no mistake, so are we. If a project doesn't support our troops, we will not fund it. If a system doesn't perform, we will terminate it. And if Congress sends me a defense bill loaded with that kind of waste, I will veto it. We will do right by our troops and taxpayers. We will build the 21st century military we need.



Finally, we will fulfill our responsibility to those who serve by keeping our promises to our people.



We will fulfill our responsibility to our forces and families. That is why we're increasing military pay, building better family housing and funding more childcare and counseling to help families cope with the stresses of war. And we've changed the rules so military spouses can better compete for federal jobs and pursue their careers.



We will fulfill our responsibility to our wounded warriors. For those still in uniform, we're investing billions of dollars for more treatment centers, more case managers and better medical care so our troops can recover and return to where they want to be--with their units.



But for so many veterans the war rages on--the flashbacks that won't go away, the loved ones who now seem like strangers, the heavy darkness of depression that has led too many of our troops to take their own lives. Post-Traumatic Stress and Traumatic Brain Injury are the defining injuries of today's wars. So caring for those affected by them is a defining purpose of my budget--billions of dollars for more treatment and mental health screening to reach our troops on the frontlines and more mobile and rural clinics to reach veterans back home. We will not abandon these American heroes.



We will fulfill our responsibility to our veterans as they return to civilian life. I was proud to co-sponsor the Post-9/11 GI Bill as a senator. Thanks to VFW members across the country--and leaders like Arizona's Harry Mitchell in Congress--it's now the law of the land. And as President, I'm committed to seeing that it is successfully implemented.



For so many of you, like my grandfather, the original GI Bill changed your life--helping you to realize your dreams. And it transformed America--helping to build the largest middle class in history. We're saying the same thing to today's Post-9/11 veterans--you pick the school, we'll help pick up the bill.



And as these veterans start showing up on campuses, I'm proud that we're making this opportunity available to all those who have sacrificed, including reservists and National Guard members and spouses and children, including kids who've lost their mom or dad. In an era when so many people and institutions have acted irresponsibly, we chose to reward the responsibility and service of our forces and their families.



Whether you left the service in 2009 or 1949, we will fulfill our responsibility to deliver the benefits and care that you earned. That's why I've pledged to build nothing less than a 21st-century VA. And I picked a lifelong soldier and a wounded warrior from Vietnam to lead this fight--General Ric Shinseki.



We're dramatically increasing funding for veterans health care. This includes hundreds of millions of dollars to serve veterans in rural areas as well as the unique needs of our growing number of women veterans. We're restoring access to VA health care for a half-million veterans who lost their eligibility in recent years--our Priority 8 veterans.



And since there's been so much misinformation out there about health insurance reform, let me say this. One thing that reform won't change is veterans health care. No one is going to take away your benefits. That's the truth.



We're keeping our promise on concurrent receipt. My budget ensures that our severely disabled veterans will receive both their military retired pay and their VA disability benefits. And I look forward to signing legislation on advanced appropriations for the VA so that the medical care you need is never held up by budget delays.



I've also directed Secretary Shinseki to focus on a top priority--reducing homelessness among veterans. Because after serving their country, no veteran should be sleeping on the streets.



And we're keeping our promise to fulfill another top priority at the VA--cutting the red tape and inefficiencies that cause backlogs and delays in the claims process. This spring, I directed the departments of defense and veterans affairs to create one unified lifetime electronic health record for members of the armed forces--a single electronic record, with privacy guaranteed, that will stay with them forever. Because after fighting for America, you shouldn't have to fight over paperwork to receive the benefits you earned.



Today, I can announce that we're taking another step. I have directed my Chief Performance Officer, my Chief Technology Officer and my Chief Information Officer to join with Secretary Shinseki in a new reform effort. We're launching a new competition to capture the very best ideas of our VA employees who work with you every day.



We're going to challenge each of our 57 regional VA offices to come up with the best ways of doing business, harnessing the best information technologies, breaking through the bureaucracy.



And then we're going to fund the best ideas and put them into action. All with a simple mission--cut those backlogs, slash those wait times and deliver your benefits sooner. I know, you've heard this for years. But with the leadership and resources we're providing, I know we can do this. And that is our mission.



Taken together, these investments represent an historic increase in our commitment to America's veterans--a 15 percent increase over last year's funding levels and the largest increase in the VA budget in more than 30 years. And over the next five years we'll invest another $25 billion more.



These are major investments, and these are difficult times. Fiscal discipline demands that we make hard decisions--sacrificing certain things we cannot afford. But let me be clear. America's commitments to its veterans are not just lines in a budget. They are bonds that are sacrosanct--a sacred trust we are honor bound to uphold. And we will.



These are the commitments we make to the patriots who serve--from the day they enlist to the day they are laid to rest. Patriots like you. Patriots like Jim Norene.



His story is his own, but in it we see the larger story of all who serve. A child of the Depression who grew up to join that greatest generation. A paratrooper in the 502nd Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne. Jumping in a daring daylight raid into Holland to liberate a captive people. Rushing to Bastogne at the Battle of the Bulge where his commanding general--surrounded by the Germans and asked to surrender--declared, famously, "Nuts."



For his bravery, Jim was awarded the Bronze Star. But like so many others, he rarely spoke of what he did or what he saw--reminding us that true love of country is not boisterous or loud but, rather, the "tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime."



He returned home and built a life. Went to school on the GI Bill. Got married. Raised a family in his small Oregon farming town. And every Veterans Day, year after year, he visited schoolchildren to speak about the meaning of service. And he did it all as a proud member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars.



Then, this spring, Jim made a decision. He would return to Europe once more. Eighty-five years old, frail and gravely ill, he knew he might not make it back home. But like the paratrooper he always was, he was determined.



Near Bastogne, he returned to the places he knew so well. At a Dutch town liberated by our GIs, schoolchildren lined the sidewalks and sang The Star-Spangled Banner. And in the quiet clearing of an American cemetery, he walked among those perfect lines of white crosses of fellow soldiers who had fallen long ago, their names forever etched in stone.



Then--back where he had served 65 years before--Jim Norene passed away. At night. In his sleep. Quietly. Peacefully. The "tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime."



The next day, I was privileged to join the commemoration at Normandy to mark that day when the beaches were stormed and a continent was freed. There were presidents and prime ministers and veterans from the far corners of the earth. But long after the bands stopped playing and the crowds stopped cheering, it was the story of a departed VFW member that echoed in our hearts.



Veterans of Foreign Wars, you have done your duty--to your fallen comrades, to your communities, to your country. You've always fulfilled your responsibilities to America. And so long as I am President, America will always fulfill its responsibilities to you.



God bless you. God bless all our veterans. And God bless the United States of America.

Via Firedoglake comes the below clip of Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY)--a single-payer advocate--who says the White House could lose up to 100 votes in the House if the public option gets stripped from health care reform.



"The President does seem like he's moving away from the public plan," Weiner said, "and if he does, he's not going to pass a bill. Because there are just too many people in Washington who believe that the public plan was the only way that you effectively bring some downward pressure on prices.

Read More →

A new Rasmussen poll in Illinois rates the 2010 Senate race for President Obama's former Senate seat as a toss-up, with Republican Rep. Mark Kirk currently leading two Democrats.

The numbers: Kirk 41%, state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias 38%; Kirk 47%, Chicago Urban League president Cheryle Jackson 30%, with Jackson having lower name recognition than Kirk and Giannoulias. The margin of error is ±4.5%.

The pollster's analysis makes clear that Democratic voters could solidify behind their eventual nominee, once the race has really gotten going: "Illinois, with a favorite son now in the White House, runs largely Democratic in statewide races, so much can change in the months ahead."

(Late update: CNN now reports that there were two men carrying assault rifles, reportedly AR-15s, outside President Obama's event in Phoenix.)

(Late late update: The Associated Press reports that there were about 12 people with guns outside the event.)

A man was seen carrying an assault rifle and a pistol outside the VFW Convention in Phoenix where President Obama spoke today, a local newspaper reports. (Click through for a photo.)

Local police said it's legal under Arizona law, but two officers kept close by him.

"If we need to intervene, we will intervene at that time," said Detective J. Oliver.

The man, who gave his name only as "Chris", was asked why he was armed. "Because I can do it," he said. "In Arizona, I still have some freedoms."

Here's video from ArizonaCentral.com (go to about 1:30). It looks like the man giving the interview was also carrying a pistol.

Hundreds of people demonstrated both for and against heath care reform outside the convention, where Obama spoke about Iraq, Afghanistan and veterans affairs. His remarks about health care were limited to improvements to the Veterans Affairs system.

This is the third report in a week of someone bringing a gun to a presidential event. At Obama's town hall last week in Portsmouth, N.H., a man was arrested for having a gun hidden in his car after the Secret Service found him at Portsmouth High School hours before Obama arrived carrying a pocketknife. He didn't have a license for a concealed weapon.

Another man in Portsmouth was spotted carrying a gun in a leg holster outside the school. The unconcealed weapon was legal under New Hampshire law and he was not arrested. Later, when asked why he brought the gun, he replied, "That's not even a relevant question. The question is, why don't people bear arms these days?"

And that's not all. A man brought a gun to a town hall with Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) last week, without incident. At an event with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ), someone dropped a gun, but he had a permit and no police report was taken. And two weeks ago, a New Mexico man tweeted that reform opponents should bring guns to town halls and "badly hurt" SEIU reps.

Former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie, the Republican nominee for Governor of New Jersey, is starting to get a rough time in the press in the wake of newly-unsealed files that showed he discussed with Karl Rove a potential run for governor while he was still U.S. Attorney.

The New York Times has a new article showing that one of Christie's top issues -- no-bid contracts -- is not such a cut-and-dry issue in his favor. After he'd run against no-bid contracts in a race for the Morris County Board in 1994, he then failed in his reform push and subsequently went with the flow, approving no-bid contracts that included his own contributors:

"I'm much better now than I was 15 years ago," he said. "I'm more mature, and I'm convinced I'll be more successful."

Mr. Christie still expressed outrage at no-bid contracts when he became a federal prosecutor -- in 2002, he called them "the biggest problem in corruption in New Jersey" -- but in the interview he backed away somewhat from his criticism.

"I think there's more things that are involved than I understood at the time," he said. "I no longer think it's the biggest thing, but it's still an element, no question."


And now Corzine has stepped up the rhetoric against Christie, telling a panel at Netroots Nation that his opponent, a supposed champion of clean government, is a "lawbreaker" due to his discussions with Rove:



Said Corzine: "It is hard to understand how a lawbreaker gets the reputation of being the king of law enforcement, and uses that as a platform. It's the Hatch Act."

Read More →

After Fox News reported that hundreds of people had received unsolicited emails from the White House, the administration said it would change how people sign up for their email list and blamed third party groups for signing people up without their permission.

Fox News reporter Major Garrett went after Press Secretary Robert Gibbs last week, demanding to know how people -- who said they'd never signed up for the email list -- received an email from senior adviser David Axelrod. Garrett implied that the administration may have used political email lists from Organizing for America (but later backtracked). Commenters to Garrett's blog, as well as Fox News analysts, theorized that the White House may have been collecting the addresses of anyone who visited the site, with one even suggesting the government could gain access to people's personal computers if they visited any .gov web site.

But it seems that anyone who sent an email via whitehouse.gov's "contact us" page was signing up to receive emails, according to Fox. Many of Garrett's sources who said they'd received unwanted emails had emailed the White House recently, and probably didn't realize they were signing on to a list.

The White House has added a check box to the contact us page so commenters can opt out of receiving future emails, Fox reports. They've also added a captcha, which verifies that users are real people by having them type in a random word. Fox says these measures appeared yesterday; we're checking in with the White House to verify.

But not everyone had emailed the White House. In a statement, deputy press secretary Nick Shapiro said "advocacy organizations" may have used people's email addresses without their permission.

"We are implementing measures to make subscribing to emails clearer, including preventing advocacy organizations from signing people up to our lists without their permission when they deliver petition signatures and other messages on individual's behalf," he said.

Shapiro was very clear that the administration doesn't buy email lists or obtain addresses from anywhere except the White House web site.

Fox News has stayed on the story, airing segments as many as three times an hour.

Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), who sits on the Senate Finance Committee, has said she could support a public option built on a level playing field with private insurers. But now she's saying she might also just vote against the entire package.

"I wouldn't preclude myself from that, no," she told the New York Times, "I know I'll be held accountable for that vote."

It's difficult to imagine her outright opposing a health care bill along the lines of what's expected to come out of the Senate--the remarks are most likely a nod to the possibility that the House of Representatives could win out in conference committee. In the past she's suggested that a robust public option--one which paid Medicare rates, or enjoyed a government subsidy--would be a non starter.

On Friday, I highlighted this article from the Jamestown Sun reporting that Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) would vote against a "government-run health care program," and took that term--"government run health care program"--to mean a "public option."

Conrad's office disputes that interpretation, saying that Conrad simply told a crowd in North Dakota he wouldn't let government take over health care. Pressed, Conrad's spokesman said the senator doesn't have an opinion on the public option, because he believes the issue is "moot."

I've reached out to the Sun to see if we can get a rundown of Conrad's exact statements.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) dug in against a public option today, telling MSNBC this morning that "the government is a predator."

"When you have the government running something, the government is not a fair competitor," he said. "The government is a predator, not a competitor."

Grassley, ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee and key Republican negotiator on the health care reform bill, said he wouldn't vote for a plan without widespread Republican support.

"I'm negotiating for Republicans and if I can't negotiate something that gets more than four Republicans, I'm not a good representative of my party," he said. "It isn't a good deal if i can't sell my product to more Republicans."

"It oughta be done ... in a consensus sort of way, where it passes with an overwhelming vote in the United States Senate," he added.

He also addressed the controversy over his comment that a government plan would "decide when to pull the plug on Grandma."

Grassley said the idea of him validating the "death panel" idea is a "distortion from the far left."

"It's not the issue we need to be talking about," he said.

Grassley added that he's not worried about his legacy.

"Forget about my political career. It could be over tomorrow or it could last another term," he said. "Good policy is good politics."

TPMLivewire