They've got muck; we've got rakes. TPM Muckraker
Though the Department of Justice has acknowledged just one email exchange with Holder using Emanuel's unofficial address, the disclosure raises questions about whether Emanuel may have sought to skirt the Presidential Records Act by conducting government business using Gmail rather than his White House address.
Emanuel, you may recall, was one of the many victims of the massive iPad data leak that disclosed the private email addresses of tens of thousands of movers and shakers in June 2010. Having been privy to his Gmail address, last year we filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act with a variety of federal agencies looking to see if he ever used it to talk to Administration officials--a tactic that the Bush White House perfected as a way to keep email communications off the historical record and out of the hands of prying congressional investigators.
And according to the Justice Department, Emanuel did just that--but only once, and allegedly for personal reasons. "We located one document, totaling one page, consisting of a personal record of Attorney General Holder," the DOJ wrote in response to our request for emails from Emanuel's Gmail address. "Specifically, the document consists of an e-mail exchange concerning a purely personal matter." The DOJ contends that, since the exchange is a "personal record" of Holder's, it isn't subject to the FOIA and refused to release it.
Using private addresses in the White House can be a big no-no. When Karl Rove and other Bushies were caught routinely using accounts supplied by the Republican National Committee to conduct the people's business, it sparked a congressional inquiry. In May 2010, the White House reprimanded deputy chief technology officer Andrew McLaughlin for using his Gmail account for official communications. The Presidential Records Act requires all White House records to be systematically preserved and archived, so using private addresses can introduce huge gaps into the system and violate the law--unless the users conscientiously forward all such emails to their official accounts.
Beyond records laws, doing government business on a personal email account raises security concerns. The iPad breach exposed Emanuel's Gmail handle, a necessary first step toward a targeted hack. The username is not public, and the security group that exposed the iPad security hole said they shared their data, including Emanuel's username, only with Gawker. But the handle could have leaked from AT&T's servers at any point between the device's April 2010 launch and the breach being fixed two months later. The security group, Goatse Security, shared the script behind their iPad exploit with third parties prior to AT&T plugging the leak, as we originally reported, and believed it likely the breach went far beyond their own collection of data. When we asked AT&T last year if anyone other than Goatse had accessed exposed iPad data, the company's flacks, who had been sending us statements, fell silent.
Normally, this might be an academic concern. A username is a necessary but not sufficient component of an account compromise. But this past June, Google disclosed that Chinese hackers had obtained Gmail passwords and silently reconfigured accounts to surreptitiously forward copies of all incoming email to another address. The victims included "senior U.S. government officials," Google added. It's not clear when the compromise occurred, but Chinese hacker attacks on Gmail went back to at least April 2009, and by January 2010 were so bad that Google began pulling out of the country. It's conceivable that Emanuel was swept up in the Gmail hacks.
As for the value of his inbox, there's only evidence so far of one off-label Emanuel-Holder exchange, and it very well may have been innocuous. (We're appealing the DOJ's claim that it's a "personal record.") But given the scrutiny that the Bush Administration received for its email hijinks, and the ongoing pressure the Obama White House has been under from Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa to account for its use of Gmail and other unofficial communication systems, it seems unlikely that Emanuel would simply carelessly lapse into a Gmail account he never used to send a single email Holder. It is more likely that he regularly used the Gmail account and either scrupulously maintained a distinction between work- and play-related messages, or exclusively sent messages to Holder and other officials' Gmail accounts (and slipped up this one time), which would have kept them out of the ambit of the FOIA. Either way, the contents of that Gmail account might be of intense interest to, say, the congressional investigators currently looking into the Solyndra loan.
We sent requests to the State, Treasury, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, and Justice departments, as well as the CIA. So far, only Justice has come up with a hit on Emanuel's Gmail; the CIA has yet to respond.
Neither the White House, the Justice Department, nor Emanuel's office responded to requests for comment.
The original version of the story appears here: http://gawker.com/5859418/rahm-emanuel-used-his-gmail-account-to-message-administration-officials
Gawker dishes the nation's most current and cutting gossip across media, entertainment, technology, and business. Founded in 2002 and namechecked frequently in mainstream publications, the site is essential reading for those who want big media hypocrisy debunked and faux-sincerity exposed, all with a healthy dose of snark.