GOP Attack Calls May Violate Fed Rules

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Starting about four weeks ago, Paige Barnes said she started getting “tons of calls a day,” sometimes between ten and twenty, from angry West Virginians and Iowans, demanding that her company stop bombarding them with political calls. These people told her that the calls had been coming from “AETR, Inc.” at the number (571) 522-6400.

She told them she had nothing to do with them and couldn’t understand why her company’s name would show up on the caller ID. That wasn’t her company’s number. When she tried calling that number, the call wouldn’t go through. “I got really upset,” she said.

She didn’t know it, but Barnes was the latest victim of the GOP’s newest, biggest attack machine, the innocuously-named Economic Freedom Fund.

Without her knowledge or consent, a “robo calling” firm appears to have used Barnes’ company name to make thousands of negative campaign calls for EFF, attacking Democratic congressional candidates. Published reports confirm that EFF calls have gone out under “AETR, Inc.” Such caller ID “spoofing,” as the practice is known, may violate FCC rules.

EFF was created in August with $5 million from multimillionaire Bob Perry, the main backer for the GOP’s favorite 2004 smear machine, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. The group has launched aggressive attacks on Democrats in Georgia, West Virginia, Iowa and Indiana by pushing oft-misleading claims through television ads, mailers — and robo calls, like those which caused Barnes’ phone to ring off the hook.

Barnes, a mother of three, is hardly a political activist. She says she’s never even contributed to a political campaign. Her company, AETR (An Event to Remember) is an event planning firm, she says, and has never used telephone marketing like the robo calls done by EFF’s contractor, ccAdvertising. (Barnes denied any connection to an escort service, “An Escort to Remember,” which shows up on a Yellow Book search of her number.)

ccAdvertising was revealed to be behind the calls in a lawsuit filed last week. The Virginia-based company admitted to bombarding Hoosiers with calls attacking Dem House candidate Baron Hill. The company filed suit against the state, which earlier had sued the company for violating Indiana’s automated phone call ban. ccAdvertising said its First Amendment rights were being violated.

After Barnes learned ccAdvertising was behind the calls, she called the company to complain, she told me. According to Barnes, Gabriel Joseph, the company president, told her he “took [AETR] off our caller ID as of Friday.” When she said that his use of her company’s name was against the law, she says he denied having done so. He insisted his company had “thousands of DBAs,” alias “doing business as” names. Then, she says, he referred further legal questions to “the main number.”

When I called Joseph, he denied ever having used another company’s name. “It’s very easy to be able to take caller ID and make it appear as if it is coming from another number; we put names that are legal and active with our numbers,” he told me. “We obey the federal law way above the standard.”

When I asked if his company had “thousands of DBAs,” he declined to comment. A review of corporate records shows that the company has a number of generic-sounding aliases, including Data Research, Election Research, Public Research, and Political Research Survey. We could find no record of the company registering AETR as an alias.

Joseph also wouldn’t confirm working on behalf of EFF, although court documents confirm the relationship.

EFF did not return my call for comment.

Latest Muckraker
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: