They've got muck; we've got rakes. TPM Muckraker

Yesterday, Ken Mehlman said that none of those 100-plus calls by phone-jamming conspirators to the White House Office of Political Affairs "involved discussion of the phone-jamming incident."

But, as Josh pointed out, James Tobin worked both for the Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee at the time. Surely Mehlman, who's Chairman of the RNC, would be in a position to vouch for the similar innocence of his employees there. We wonder in particular about Terry Nelson, who made the government's witness list.

So I called the RNC, left a message, called and emailed the NRSC's press secretary, and called Terry Nelson's consulting firm, left a message. Radio silence all around. Chris Lacivita, who worked for the NRSC in 2002 and also made the government's witness list, is a hard man to track down. A call to DCI Group, where he is supposed to work, only elicited a promise that they'd look for his contact info - the woman who answered the phone wouldn't even admit that Lacivita actually worked there.

So it looks like we'll just have to keep asking.

Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington -- ah, the Quixotes among us -- are tilting at the House Ethics Committee again.

This time it's to goad the panel into investigating Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA), who appears to have engaged in legal and ethical violations large and small.

Read More →

Oh, who will it be next?

Raw Story reports that the "distilled beverage company" referred to in Tony Rudy's guilty plea is SPI Spirits, which produces Stoli vodka.

SPI paid $25,000 into Jack Abramoff's sham charity the Capital Athletic Foundation as a kind of off-the-books fee, and also paid $20,000 to a "public policy group" - which Raw Story identifies as the National Center for Public Policy Research. The NCPPR kicked back $8,000 of that fee to Rudy - as a kind of thank you, you might say.

The NCPPR served as a front to cover various Abramoff junkets, but also as another forum for Abramoff to buy good press for his clients - the director Amy Ridenour was another of Abramoff's editorial-writing hacks. In this case, she went to bat for Stoli vodka (you can see her work on Stoli's website).

For those who can't get enough, Slate published some of Abramoff's correspondence with Ridenour a couple of weeks ago.

The D.C. watchdog group Project on Government Oversight has uncovered some strange stuff about California GOP House candidate Brian Bilbray. He sure can be devoted to some strange causes.

In the mid-1990s, an unusual project called Bajagua landed on desks around Washington. Bajagua -- a plan cooked up by two Southern California developers -- was to pump water from Mexico to San Diego; process the water once; pump it back to Mexico; and process it a second time, then pipe it into Mexican households. POGO's Nick Schwellenbach wrote a great report on this you can find here.

If that sounds strange to you, you're not alone. Both the EPA and the State Department rejected the idea. But Bilbray believed! He also got campaign donations from the Bajagua project's backers.

Read More →

Yesterday, we reported that a New Hampshire GOP strategist working with New Hampshire Republicans had spoken to a number of lawyers the morning of the phone jamming. She then spoke to the White House later that day.

Her story, told to us and the AP, was that she didn't know anything about the jamming until after the Election. If so, she seems to have been by an inexplicable urge for legal advice on election eve and Election Day. She'd made five more calls to lawyers the day before, many of whom were ultimately involved in defending the New Hapshire Republicans in the subsequent investigation of the jamming.

The Senate Majority Project has the details.

In the morning press gaggle, White House spokesman Scott McClellan danced around the issue of why the president continued to insist those Iraqi trailers were mobile bioweapons labs, when they were known to be no such thing.

But Bush wasn't the only one. While the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency debunked the story in a May 27, 2003 report, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, along with Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, continued to push the mobile weapons labs quackery for months:

Read More →

Why is Rep. Charles Taylor (R-N.C.) getting a free ride on his shilling for Jack Abramoff?

Yesterday's AP story about Abramoff's work for the Saginaw Chippewa had some damning stuff.

In 2002, Abramoff's team was trying hard to land their client, the Saginaw Chippewa of Michigan, a $3 million grant to build a new school. Here's where Taylor came in. First, Taylor wrote a forceful letter prodding reluctant Interior officials to endorse the grant. Then he helped Abramoff bypass a troublesome member of his own staff, who was holding up the deal. In return, Abramoff put on a fundraiser and threw some contributions his way.

Read More →

Brian Bilbray's a funny guy. I don't mean funny ha-ha -- I've never met the man. But he's got a spotty history with lobbyists and lobbying that make him an odd fellow for the GOP to run for Congress -- in California's 50th, anyway.

Bilbray was the top GOP vote-getter in last night's special election in the district, once represented by Randy "Duke" Cunningham. Bilbray will face off against Democrat Francine Busby in a special election this June. So we'll be seeing more of him.

During his recent years as a lobbyist, and his earlier Congressional career representing California's 49th District in the late 1990s, Bilbray made some questionable choices.

Read More →

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald issued a correction today of his filing last week. Apparently Scooter Libby didn't actually say that he'd been told to tell Judith Miller of the New York Times that a key judgment of the National Intelligence Estimate had been that Iraq was "vigorously trying to produce uranium." You can read Fitzgerald's letter here.

Why's this a big deal? Because that finding wasn't a key judgment. So Libby would have been lying if he'd said that. The NY Times, relying on Fitgerald's version of Libby's testimony, wrote a piece pointing that out.

The original filing read: "[Libby] understood that he was to tell Miller, among other things, that a key judgment of the NIE held that Iraq was 'vigorously trying to procure' uranium.'"

But Fitzgerald has amended the sentence to read: "[Libby] understood that he was to tell (then-New York Times reporter Judith) Miller, among other things, some of the key judgments of the NIE (National Intelligence Estimate), and that the NIE stated that Iraq was 'vigorously trying to procure' uranium." (my emphasis)

So I guess you can subtract one data point of mendacity from the administration leading up to war.