Opinions, Context & Ideas from the TPM Editors TPM Editor's Blog

The Murdoch Primary, Back On Again?


The Journal just up and craps all over the whole sorry spectacle, even suggesting that it might be a campaign turning point. Who knows whether there's any truth to that. But the point to focus on is the suggestion that it's part of a basic problem with the campaign itself -- that it's not up to snuff. The latest pratfall, says the Journal, "is of a piece with the campaign's insular staff and strategy that are slowly squandering an historic opportunity."

Remember, Journal boss Rupert Murdoch pushed the same line earlier this week via twitter: "Met Romney last week. Tough O Chicago pros will be hard to beat unless he drops old friends from team and hires some real pros. Doubtful".

Now, who knows if this is true? As I said last month, pundits and editorialists have a really difficult time knowing what's happening in a campaign in real time. Mostly they infer back from what they see in the polls. And if candidate A is having a hard time, it's because the campaign is made up of morons. I figure this is mainly that. (An alternative explanation might be the inherent difficulty of building a campaign around attacking an opponent for supporting a policy you created.)

But press chatter is a world unto itself and a powerful one and one that campaigns often end up reacting to. So for now, let's just take notice that this seems to be the new conventional wisdom: that the Romney campaign just isn't ready for prime time. And the Murdoch world seems particularly invested in it.