The Message It Will Send

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

TPM Reader VF:

If people truly think Democrats in Congress are going to look at a poor election result this November and say “wow, it looks like we weren’t liberal enough for our base,” you don’t know the Democrats in Congress.

Choosing not to vote sends precisely the same “message” as a new tea partier who decides to vote Republican. The politicians won’t be able to tell the difference. And even if they somehow could (advanced analysis of precinct data, exit polling, etc.), the moderates who have been the problem the whole time will ignore that and feel more emboldened than ever that they were right that the Dems “overreached” during this session. And the mainstream media will be all too happy to amplify that sentiment.

A somewhat different take from TPM Reader BF:

Although I get your point that the reaction among some to just walk away is a sort of emotional rather than reasoned response to political realities, just consider that this is the reaction simply among many who are in fact politically engaged. What do you think the reaction is among people who cannot afford to do anything but vote and who are, in theory, the Dems core constituency?

I remember telling a political friend after the 2004 election (we met as volunteers on the Dean campaign) that I thought the Democrats could actually win if they made a concerted effort to speak to underrepresented minorities (e.g., African Americans, Latinos, the poor) by talking about their issues seriously and making real progress on those a centerpiece of the campaign (vs. the condescending pandering with which we are all familiar). The purpose would not be to convert Republican voters but to inspire these frankly large constituencies to actually vote. Whether it is accurate or not, many of those people do not see an appreciable difference in their quality of life on the basis of who is in office. They generally get screwed either way.

I don’t want to get into the possible naivete of my original argument, but the underlying point still holds. A Republican is no different from a Democrat to a lot of people who feel unrepresented either way and who don’t bother voting as a result. It may look self-defeating to those of us who are more invested on a daily basis and who can discern and care about the differences between what both sides actually accomplish, however small and dispiriting they can be at times, but it makes sense to me as a way of coping with the realization that politics has failed to make a difference for you.

Latest Editors' Blog
  • |
    April 22, 2024 1:31 p.m.

    Like David, I’m still not clear that we have a satisfying explanation of just why the last week on Capitol…

  • |
    April 22, 2024 11:59 a.m.

    Opening statements are complete in the Trump trial, and our Josh Kovensky has done a tremendous job covering it in…

  • |
    April 20, 2024 5:13 p.m.

    Let me return to add a few more thoughts on what happened between Israel and Iran. Iran launched a massive…

  • |
    April 19, 2024 11:43 a.m.

    I hope you get a chance to read Josh Kovensky’s trial report from yesterday. He gets at a really good…

Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: