Over at TPMCafe’s Table for One, Charlie Savage has a very interesting post on the strategy behind the Bush Administration’s selection of Supreme Court nominees. He argues, pretty persuasively, that nominees were vetted more for their adherence to a philosophy of expansive presidential power than for their positions on the social issues that dominate the Supreme Court confirmation process.
Savage on the Supreme Court
|
September 12, 2007 2:37 p.m.
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter