Don’t Over-Interpret The New Obamacare Numbers

FILE - In this Friday, Nov. 15, 2013 photo, the shadow of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is shown as she speaks at the Community Health and Social Services Center in Detroit. Technology experts... FILE - In this Friday, Nov. 15, 2013 photo, the shadow of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is shown as she speaks at the Community Health and Social Services Center in Detroit. Technology experts say healing what ails the Healthcare.gov website will be a tougher task than the Obama administration acknowledges. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The latest Obamacare enrollment figures are out. Things were better in November than October, but they were still bad.

But that doesn’t tell us much that is new.

The key will be December enrollment figures, which will benefit from HealthCare.gov finally being more or less fixed and the projected surge in enrollments ahead of the Dec. 23 deadline to sign up for coverage that begins Jan. 1.

The takeaway from the new numbers is that, yes, the botched HealthCare.gov launch decimated enrollment projections for October and November and has made it very difficult to hit the original Jan. 1 enrollment target of 3.3 million. That means some people will be needlessly without insurance come Jan. 1. The hope is that all of those people will still go ahead and enroll before the open enrollment period closes at the end of March. The administration says it remains confident it can hit its target of 7 million enrollees by then.

So bad news — and frustrating confirmation of the effects of the launch failures — but it’s the same bad news we’ve known about for a while now.

Latest Editors' Blog
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: