But, wait, there's more!
Now, one of Romney's problems in this debate is that he's actually been extremely resistant about releasing any actual information about what's in his plan. And that's forced analysts to make various assumptions about what he'd actually do.
But the campaign's main campaign angle has been to posit a Romney Economic Boom that would take hold on Romney's election. So basically, all the formula and modeling doesn't really matter because Romney's policies would spur such massive growth that tax revenues just couldn't help but go up and everyone would do great.
So a typical supply-side argument. But just look who the campaign is putting forward as the expert on the Romney Economic Boom. I'm sort of surprised no one has pointed this out. It's none other than Kevin Hassett.
Who's Kevin Hassett? Well, he's none other than the coauthor of the spectacularly boomtime late 90s bestseller Dow 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting from the Coming Rise in the Stock Market. As TPM Reader WM points out, not only was the book amazingly wrong and basically assumed the tech boom was permanent, the whole concept was based on the idea that stocks should be valued on a "formula that double-counted earnings and dividends. A true classic in wingnut economics."
Now, just to clarify: Dow 36,000.
This is the expert people are supposed to trust when we're told that the economy will grow so fast that normal tax analysis pretty much won't matter any more in the Romney Economic Boom?