Here’s my second column for The Hill. The topic: the sad consequences of trying to run a manned space flight program on the cheap. Here’s a snippet.
Critics contend that NASA is bloated and inefficient. And, to an extent, theyâre right. Cost overruns are commonplace, and compared to old-fashioned rockets, the shuttle is very expensive to fly. But itâs possible for an agency to be bloated, inefficient and underfunded. In fact, the latter can sometimes lead to the former. The problem is like that of an under-capitalized business or a falling-apart old car that costs more money in upkeep than it would to buy a newer model.
As I am on Iraq, I’m probably a bit off the reservation in wanting big budgets for the manned space program. But there you have it. Click here to read the whole thing.
