They truly know no limits.
Condi Rice says that if the facts revealed in the Kay Report had been known last winter, the UN Security Council would have backed President Bush in going to war.
The comments are noted in Bill Sammonâs article today in the Washington Times and the transcript is here at the White House website.
The full quotation is â¦
Had any one of these examples been discovered last winter, the Security Council would have had no choice but to take exactly the same course that President Bush followed: to declare Saddam Hussein in defiance of Resolution 1441, and enforce its serious consequences.
Really? Is that how it is? <$Ad$> Every administration fudges, conceals, or deceives in this way or that. But, at least in my memory, I cannot remember any administration or even any administration official that so routinely says things that are the polar opposite of reality — when the facts to the contrary are sitting right out there in the open.
Set aside all the ridiculous efforts to spin the details of the Kay Report into some sort of vindication for the White House. The one thing the Report clearly shows is that Saddam was doing far less on the WMD front than even our staunchest international critics suggested. Given that they were unwilling to go to war when they thought he had some stocks of WMD, itâs awfully hard to figure why they would go to war once it confirmed that he had none.
Itâs just more up-is-downism. The same ridiculous spin as a year ago.
