I just read this article in the Times, billed as Cheney’s counterattack against the Democratic ticket, figuring it would be filled with various distortions and untruths I could pick apart.
Really, though, there’s not much there to pick apart, because there’s simply not much there. Some boiler plate about raising taxes, the troop funding vote run-around and some stuff about John Edwards hair — that’s about it.
If the Times author is reasonably conveying Cheney’s message, it’s awfully weak stuff.
12:57 a.m.: It’s hard to know the precise significance of Israel’s retaliatory strike or how Iran might respond. So far…
A new episode of The Josh Marshall Podcast is live! This week, Kate and Josh discuss the beginning of the…
I don’t pretend to even understand the moving parts of how this is supposed to work. But almost out of…
Now that we’re getting a view of the dynamics of Donald Trump on trial — not indicted, not awaiting trial,…
