TPM Reader BR from Houston …
Josh,
This is the moment when the mask comes off, the curtain is pulled, and everyoneâbut especially Bush supportersâgets to see the sad little wizard pulling the strings and relying on his megaphone.
Leave aside the question of whether having our ports controlled by UAE will actually make us less safeâI donât like it, but I donât have hard evidence. The larger political point is that Bush has lived and died by the war on terror. He has accused those he believed to be less zealous of, virtually, treason. Etc. etc.
Being a War President, and the War on Terror itself, eclipses everything.
Except when it doesnât.
The people who voted for him genuinely believed that he would keep them safer than any alternative we could elect. And now heâs blowing it all off, under the guise of âfair playâ for countries that have âplayed by the rules.â Aside from the cribbing from Clinton, just which rules is it he thinks the UAE has played by?
The cynicism of his defense of the port deal is just staggering. Heâs not even interested in pretending he didnât know, or hadnât considered the psychological ramifications, etc. Not even a nod to âmaybe we should review this one more time.â
Could be itâs moneyâthere is clearly some conflict of interesting running around the Treasury Dept.
But maybe they just donât care. Itâs all been a show, from day one. Or, I should say, Day 911.
I hope this knocks some sense into Republican heads. From what I heard on Sean Hannity today, perhaps it has.
I’m still interested in finding out a bit more about just what this deal would leave the UAE company in charge of. But what stands out about the president’s talk tough statement today is that it really does amount to — “The fact we’re doing this means that we’ve looked into it and it’s fine. So what’s your problem?”
Here’s an actual quote: “They ought to listen to what I have to say about this. They ought to look at the facts and understand the consequences of what they’re going to do. But if they pass a law, I’ll deal with it, with a veto … they need to know that our government has looked at this issue and looked at it carefully. Again, I repeat, if there was any question as to whether or not this country would be less safe as a result of the transaction, it wouldn’t go forward.”
In the most generous reading, it’s like he’s insulted when we don’t take his word for it that he’s got us covered.