In it, but not of it. TPM DC

Report: Republicans Give Up On Redefining Rape

Wmwuv6j78utvdtzslech
Newscom / UPI

Though the House bill was never really likely to become law with a Democratically-controlled Senate and a committed pro-choice president in the White House, the language regarding forcible rape had created a firestorm among the pro-choice activists and politicians around the country. Even pro-life Democrats who had signed on to the bill as co-sponsors questioned the forcible rape wording, which experts said would likely change which abortions could be covered under the rape and incest exemptions in existing federal law.

Republicans and pro-life groups quickly clammed up about the bill, declining to comment on it to just about anyone -- until today when the bill's language changed.

The altered bill language will be undoubtedly be seen by some as a victory for pro-choice activists. But the bill still contains numerous provisions that appear to dramatically expand federal limits on abortion funding. The new version of the bill apparently retains the clause that limits the incest exemption to girls under the age of 18 and language that makes it tougher for women to obtain abortion coverage through their private insurers.

Updates: Pro-choice members of Congress took a look at the revised language of the bill and told TPM they still hate it.

Smith's office did not respond to numerous requests for comment from TPM, but his staff released a statement to other reporters making clear that the controversial incest language has also been dropped in favor of language copied from the Hyde Amendment.