In it, but not of it. TPM DC
And what of the idea that people would prefer a partisan bill if it meant a public option rather than a bipartisan bill that scraps the public option?
"Well, I don't know. It depends on what the public option is. Once again, were talking about the public option as though there's a single definition or a single concept. There are multiple concepts about a public option and the problem is we all talk about it as though they're all the same and they're not. So that's why when somebody says 'are you for a public option?' Define the public option and I can tell you."
That doesn't quite get to the heart of the contradiction between Nelson's paeans to public's desire for bipartisanship. But Nelson does seem to accept the idea that the public wants a public option, even if that means a Democrat-only bill, and using the data to argue that what people really want is a compromise on the public option.