In it, but not of it. TPM DC

How A Bunch Of Republicans Accidentally Voted To End Welfare-To-Work Requirements

Vvv39n8fx7mtcrrqlxal
Newscom

"I don't think the TANF work requirements were what they had in mind when they were working on the Foxx bill," says Elizabeth Lower-Basch of the Center for Law and Social Policy. "But it is sort of a collateral consequence."

According to a brief written by CLASP, for the House Education and Workforce Committee hearing on the bill in June, the bill also "eliminates many of the requirements and mandates that governed the now consolidated streams." The committee cleared the bill anyway.

That, of course, is exactly what Republicans are falsely claiming the Obama administration's state waivers would do. In reality, those waivers are only on offer to states that can demonstrate that they have or will increase the number of people transitioning from welfare to work by at least 20 percent.

The GOP's legislation has no such safeguards. According to the Congressional Research Service analysis of the bill published this month, "[I]f TANF funds were consolidated into the [Workforce Investment Fund], TANF program requirements (e.g., work requirements) may no longer apply to that portion of funding because the TANF funding would not exist (i.e., it would be part of the WIF and thus subject to WIF program requirements)."

Neither the Romney nor Obama campaigns have responded to requests for comment on the bill's implications. But it's clear from the committee vote that there's a well of GOP support for wiping out all kinds of eligibility requirements for federal programs in the service of slashing them.