Grassley: We’re Dropping End Of Life Counseling Because I’ve Helped Mislead People Into Thinking That’s A Death Panel

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Here’s a new rule of thumb if you ever become a powerful senator: If you want to kill a provision in a bill, lie about it publicly, then tell everybody the measure is dead because it’s widely misunderstood.

Yesterday, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, told a crowd they were right to worry that Medicare reimbursement for end of life counseling by physicians might amount to euthanizing seniors. Today, he announces that the provision has been dropped because it “could be misinterpreted.”

Late update: And, if that wasn’t bad enough, Grassley’s also patting himself on the back for delaying health care reform, which in turn created political space for the town hall disruptions.

Late late update: Here’s more from Grassley: “Maybe others can defend a bill like the Pelosi bill that leaves major issues open to interpretation, but I can’t,” Grassley added.

Another way of putting this is that Grassley’s shocked–shocked!–that anybody would write a bill that doesn’t explicitly disavow death panels. In fact, all bills must clearly delineate that even their most antiseptic provisions aren’t, in fact, secret passageways into death panels.

Latest DC
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: