"I'm glad it ended the way it did. If we would have kept American air power in the fight it would have been over quicker. Let's get in on the ground. There is a lot of money to be made in the future in Libya. A lot of oil to be produced. Let's get on the ground and help the Libyan people establish a democracy and a functioning economy based on free market principles. When it comes to weapons control. We need to get teams on the ground now that can assist this government to make sure that this stuff doesn't fall into wrong hands. We don't have much of a presence. There is an opening, get people on the ground."
There's likely to be major disagreement over what to do about Libya now between interventionists like Graham and a large faction of skeptics in Congress. But why spend there when austerity in the United States means workers are getting laid off and infrastructures decaying. We asked Graham in the Capitol after a vote on Thursday and he explained.
"I would say this is a loan, not a gift," Graham said. "It is in our interest to get their oil back online, so we can have more supply, which will help our consumers, it is in our interest to get their economy moving forward, so a vacuum won't be filled by extremists, and we will get the money we invest back. We have $34 billion in frozen assets we can draw from, it is in America's interests for Libya to turn out well. It is in America's interest for Libya to get back to producing oil to help the world's oil supply. we'll be now getting oil from a friend rather than a foe."
Brian Fung contributed reporting.