In an excerpt of a yet-to-air interview with NBC, President Barack Obama says his Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor probably should have chosen different words to convey the sentiment she was trying to convey in her now-famous 2001 speech.
Conservatives have latched on to this sentence--"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life"--to suggest that Sotomayor is unfit to serve on the Court. Some have even gone so far as to call her a racist. Unsurprisingly, a fuller context of her remarks, which appear below the fold, tell a significantly different story.
The big argument going into the New Jersey Republican gubernatorial primary this coming Tuesday is just who is the legitimate conservative -- or more precisely, whether the establishment frontrunner Chris Christie is a legitimate conservative.
The latest Rasmussen poll has Christie, a former U.S. attorney, ahead of right-wing insurgent Steve Lonegan, a former Bogota mayor, by 46%-35%. But in a low turnout primary, of course, anything can happen. So Christie has brought in a true-believing, genuine conservative politician to be his advocate: Mitt Romney.
"Chris Christie is a strong conservative voice for balanced budgets, low taxes and more jobs," Mitt said.
A new CNN poll shows just how tricky the debate over health care really is. People are all for expanded coverage and greater government involvement -- right up until they have to face the tradeoffs.
"In general, would you favor or oppose a program that would increase the federal government's influence over the country's health care system in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans?" Americans favor government intervention in the health system by 69%-29%.
"In general, would you favor or oppose a program that would increase the federal government's influence over the health care you and your family receive in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans?" When it involves their own care and their families, approval is still high, but a bit lower: 63%-36%.
Newt Gingrich does not seem to be deterred by the new message of the Republican leadership, such as Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), that he and Rush Limbaugh should stop calling Sonia Sotomayor a racist.
Gingrich has now sent out a fundraising e-mail, asking for help to send blast faxes to every member of the Senate demanding that the Sotomayor nomination be defeated. He even says that she shouldn't even get a vote in the Senate, but should just have to withdraw.
Gingrich warns that all of American civilization is at stake here. "If Civil War, suffrage, and Civil Rights are to mean anything, we cannot accept that conclusion," he writes. "It is simply un-American. There is no room on the bench of the United States Supreme Court for this worldview."
Joe Hoeffel, a former congressman, and Sen. Arlen Specter's 2004 general election rival, has come out for Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) in the likely Democratic primary.
"If Joe Sestak runs in the primary, I will support him," Hoeffel told the Daily Times of Delaware County. "I admire him very much and think he will be a strong candidate for whatever he runs for, including reelection."
Hoeffel's a well known and popular figure in Pennsylvania politics, and his endorsement could give Sestak some early, and helpful momentum.
The White House is now walking back Sonia Sotomayor's statement from 2001 that she would hope a wise Latina woman could reach better conclusions in some cases than a white male, which was meant to be a point about how people's life experiences can affect their judgments.
At today's press briefing, Robert Gibbs said: "I've not talked specifically with her about this, but I think that -- I think she'd say that her word choice in 2001 was poor, that she was simply making the point that personal experiences are relevant to the process of judging."
He later added, "I think if she had the speech to do all over again, I think she'd change that word," citing discussions with other people as his source.
The Sotomayor nomination has become an occasion for Pat Buchanan to refocus on his main political cause: The endangered, persecuted white male.
On MSNBC today, Buchanan sad that Sonia Sotomayor believes in advancing minorities at the expense of white men -- and so does President Obama:
"But I do agree that Sonia Sotomayor, she does believe in race-based justice -- basically at the expense of white males, to advance people of color," said Buchanan. "But the truth is, that's what Barack Obama believes, as well."
Later on, the discussion about the New Haven firefighters case got pretty heated. "And these firefighters are gonna win it," Buchanan exclaimed, "and that woman was takin' away their rights because they were white!"
So let's try and keep track. First Barack Obama said he wanted his Supreme Court nominee to bring a quality of empathy to the bench. Then he picked Sonia Sotomayor, who claimed to embody this quality. Then Republicans and movement conservatives alike launched a possibly ill-advised war on empathy (at least as it applies to Supreme Court nominees).
And I believe, Senator, that I can make a contribution, that I can bring something different to the Court, that I can walk in the shoes of the people who are affected by what the Court does. You know, on my current court I have occasion to look out the window that faces C Street, and there are converted buses that bring in the criminal defendants to our criminal justice system, bus load after bus load. And you look out and you say to yourself, and I say to myself almost every day, "But for the grace of God there go I."
Unfortunately for conservatives, though, this laughably transparent double standards has forced many on the right to up the ante, calling Sotomayor a racist, while making an issue of her race and gender. And it's creating some problems for them.
Rush Limbaugh is now comparing the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the idea of nominating David Duke:
"She brings a form of bigotry or racism to the court," Limbaugh said, later adding: "How can a president nominate such a candidate? And how can a party get behind such a candidate? That's what would be asked if somebody were foolish enough to nominate David Duke or pick somebody even less offensive."
Late Update: At the White House press briefing just now, Robert Gibbs was asked about the David Duke comparison and what Sotomayor would think of it. Gibbs searched for the words to answer the absurdity of it: "I don't think you have to be the nominee to -- (laughs) -- I don't think you have to be the nominee to find what's said today offensive." After noting that other Republicans have been condemning this kind of rhetoric, he said of the Ku Klux Klan comparisons: "It's amazing."