In it, but not of it. TPM DC

Congressional Republicans aren’t sure what President-elect Donald Trump’s “plan” for replacing Obamacare is, but many were perfectly confident that it would fit in neatly with their effort to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, which has already been bogged down intra-party disagreements.

Key senators in the repeal effort admitted this week -- after Trump told the Washington Post that he would be unveiling a plan that would bring “insurance for everybody” --- that they had not seen details of the alleged plan. It was also unclear if they knew such a plan existed before Trump’s comments about it. Still, even though they weren’t sure exactly what Trump meant when he said “insurance for everybody," they assumed his interpretation of the ideal Obamacare replacement matched their own: that the goal would be making the cost of insurance cheaper for consumers to expand “access,” rather than universal coverage.

Read More →

Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, on Wednesday would not commit to recusing himself from issues related to the lawsuits he brought against the EPA as attorney general of Oklahoma.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) noted that Pruitt has brought several lawsuits against EPA regulations, and noted that Pruitt would be "plaintiff, defendant, judge, and jury" if confirmed as the EPA administrator. He asked Pruitt to commit to recusing himself to issues related to the cases he brought against the EPA.

In response, Pruitt said he would follow the guidance of the EPA's ethics office.

Markey then asked, "Are you saying you will not recuse yourself from the actual matters which you’re suing the EPA on right now as attorney general of Oklahoma for the time that you are the head of the EPA?"

"I'm not saying that at all, Senator," Pruitt replied.

"You are saying that. Will you recuse yourself?" Markey asked.

Pruitt again said he would follow the guidance of the ethics office at the EPA.

"You’re not committing, and I think that's a big mistake," Markey said in response.

Read More →

As concerns escalate over the GOP’s plans to repeal Obamacare, and what it means for the millions with pre-existing conditions whose coverage has been guaranteed by the law, Republicans have pointed to so-called high-risk pools, as if they were magic bullet of sorts for covering seriously sick individuals.

However, using high-risk pools as a substitute for the Affordable Care Act would cost a boatload of money, health care policy experts tell TPM, and when states implemented it in the past, it was often consumers who were left picking up the tab or left out of the system entirely.

“It’s better than nothing, to help some people,” said Henry Aaron, a senior fellow in the Economic Studies Program at the Brookings Institution, “but it’s a massive step backward from the Affordable Care Act.

Read More →

Earlier this week, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) did something few Republicans have dared to do since the election: go into some detail of how he would like to see lawmakers go about transitioning into a replacement for an Affordable Care Act.

His vision, which he outlined in a speech on the Senate floor Tuesday, is earning measured praise from some health care policy experts for at least acknowledging that Republicans may have to keep some aspects of Obamacare alive while they work on an alternative to avoid causing major chaos to the individual market.

Read More →

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) is having conversations with "four or five" Democrats he hopes will help him work toward a replacement for the Affordable Care Act, but he said that Democrats are still waiting to see if Republicans will get their act together before signing on.

"We have to show that we have our act together before they're going to risk it," Cassidy told reporters. "I'm okay with that."

Cassidy said he didn't know if other colleagues were trying to reach across the aisle at this point.

"I want this to be an American solution, not a Republican solution," he said. "I say that not rhetorically, but the only major social programs that have worked in our country have been bipartisan, and we need this to be bipartisan."

Read More →

Former Attorney General Eric Holder highlighted his plans to focus on redistricting reform in the post Obama-era, with remarks Thursday marking the the launch of the political group he will lead.

“Gerrymandering has always been part of the political process, but what we are seeing is gerrymandering on steroids and I think that’s the thing that we are in the process of trying to combat,” he said Thursday during a Q&A at the left-leaning think tank, Center for American Progress.

Read More →

Retired Gen. James Mattis offered unqualified support for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during his Thursday Senate confirmation hearing to serve as Defense Secretary, and accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of trying to break the alliance, which has served as the bedrock of American and European security since 1949.

Mattis was careful not to disparage Donald Trump as senators repeatedly pressed him to answer for the President-elect’s threats to only ensure U.S. protection for NATO allies who fulfilled their financial obligations under the treaty.

The retired general vowed to stand behind NATO “100 percent” when asked by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) how Trump would respond if some member countries don’t “pony up” financial dues.

He called the treaty “vital to our security,” and said he was “confident” that Trump expected his national security team to “live up to our word” in Article 5 of the treaty, which enshrines collective defense.

“My view is that nations with allies thrive and nations without allies don't,” he said earlier in the hearing in response to a question by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) about his support for the alliance.

Read More →