The Speech Rubio Couldn’t Stop Giving, Trump Embraces Torture, and Hunkering Down With Texan Doomsday Preppers

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Check out Monday’s newsletter!

February 8, 2016

Top Stories


Rubio Defends The Speech He Couldn’t Stop Giving At The Debate

The Gist: Marco Rubio said four times during ABC’s debate that Republicans had to dispel the notion that Obama “doesn’t know what he’s doing.”

Trump Defends Waterboarding: ‘I Have No Doubt That It Does Work’

The Gist: The Republican candidate said he would “bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding” if elected President.

AP Fact Checks GOP Debate: Skewed Claims On Taxes, Health Insurance

The Gist:  Viewers of the latest debate didn’t get a straight story from the candidates on US taxes vs. the world, the state of the health insurance marketplace under “Obamacare” or what might happen if that law is taken away.

From The Reporter’s Notebook


TPM’s Tierney Sneed reported on how public complaints aired by insurance companies about their experience on the ACA exchanges are also geared towards influencing regulations down the road. One regulatory issue insurers are taking aim at is special enrollment periods, which allow certain people—like those who’ve lost a job or are having a baby—to sign up for coverage outside the typical open enrollment period. Insurers contend that some people are abusing special enrollment, so restrictions need to be tightened, while consumer advocates argue there’s no proof that that’s the case.

Agree or Disagree?


Josh Marshall on Rubio’s debate blunder: “He was not a frontrunner needing to avoid a mistake. He was someone who was behind but appeared to be making rapid progress. I think this may seriously blunt what seemed to be a rush of voters in his direction. The deadliest thing for a politician is always becoming an object of mockery and ridicule. That’s what Rubio’s facing during a critical two day period.”

Say What?!


“They said go out when you hear your name and I didn’t hear my name.”

– Ben Carson explains why he stood awkwardly in the wings for a solid two minutes before Saturday’s Republican debate, even as other candidates walked out past him onto the stage. 

BUZZING: Today in the Hive


From a TPM Prime member: “Every woman has been the unacceptable woman. We pushed it too far, we gave too much of our opinion, we didn’t defer enough, we were unacceptable. The Unacceptable Woman this year and for many years had been Hillary Clinton. She is running and has a good chance to be President so the attacks on her character have been deep and sustained, they have been personal and insulting. The sustained attacks against Hillary Clinton are attacks that most women have endured universally. Not that we are running for the Presidency, but that we are always doubted and credit for our achievements are discounted, we have endured the same attacks at one time or another in our lives. No woman escapes it, not one of us. So the attacks seem personal. They hit far too close to home. When progressives use right wing attacks on the only woman Democratic candidate, I wonder why. I become appalled. I can’t believe this is what the election is coming down to on the progressive side, deeply institutionally sexist attacks. I find them enraging and unacceptable, While I am not voting for Clinton merely because she is a woman, in part I do think that it is time for a woman and HRC isn’t just any woman, she has real accomplishments.”

Related: Clinton knocked Donald Trump’s “penchant for sexism” after he called her “disgusting” for using the restroom at a debate.

Have something to add? Become a Prime member and join the discussion here.

What We’re Reading


What this politics reporter learned helping a refugee family stranded at the airport (Washington Post).

Jeremy Wilson: A compulsive con man (New York Times)

What to expect when you’re expecting the collapse of society (Buzzfeed)


Latest Daybreaker
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: