« For months people have as... | Talking Points Memo Home | When last we updated the ... »

07.08.05 -- 6:35PM
By Josh Marshall

In response to the question immediately below, a lot of commenters are suggesting the quite logical explanation that Novak's not in trouble because he cooperated and spilled the beans. But if that's true, why didn't that allow Fitzgerald to wrap the whole thing up right then and there? Would he really have allowed Novak off the hook for anything else beside telling him who his sources were, what they said, etc?

Perhaps Novak tried to pass off on <$Ad$>him the convenient lie that the persons in question didn't know or didn't tell him that Plame was covert. But some careful research we did almost two years ago on this point should pretty clearly I think that Novak has been fibbing through his teeth when he says this.

So, like I said, if Novak did cooperate and if that didn't provide enough for Fitzgerald to make some indictments or wrap the whole thing up, that in itself points to some more complex situation than most are considering.

Like I said, we're discussing the question here.

Recent Archives

February 12, 2012 - February 18, 2012
February 5, 2012 - February 11, 2012
January 29, 2012 - February 4, 2012
January 22, 2012 - January 28, 2012

TPM News Headlines




Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address