I've hinted at this in a few of Sunday's posts. But another wrinkle in the Albuquerque Journal article is the sourcing. As I suggested earlier and this non-denial denial seems to confirm, the Domenici-Bush conversation does seem to have occurred. But the Journal's story is a bit vague on the sourcing. The article says the paper "confirmed the sequence of events through a variety of sources familiar with the firing of Iglesias, including sources close to Domenici." Close to Domenici looks like the key. These are facts no one else has been able to dig up so far. But proxies for Domenici wouldn't seem to have much interest in putting this story out. So what's up exactly? And what does it suggest about the facts alleged in the article?